H&W control from Frugal Photographer

[laser]

POTA is an excellent developer for Tech Pan and similar films . 1.5 grams of Phenidone and 30 grams of NaSO3 per liter. See the paper by Marilyn Levy of Rome Air Base in the 1970s.

 

[MCB18]

POTA is an excellent developer for Tech Pan and similar films . 1.5 grams of Phenidone and 30 grams of NaSO3 per liter. See the paper by Marilyn Levy of Rome Air Base in the 1970s.

Yes but unfortunately it is not nearly as shelf stable and requires a lot more developing agent than this recipe.

I plan to try and shoot another test roll of this same film at EI 80-100 today and develop it the same as before, maybe with a bit less agitation since the contrast is a touch high still.

 

[MCB18]

Well, the microfilm seems to work well in this developer around EI 50, however the film is not as dense as I would like it to be. The part I deliberately exposed to room light is not pure black and so I think that I may need to add a bit more development time, or increase agitation frequency.

Bracketed exposures around EI 50 (middle), +/- 1/2 stops. Negatives:


Inverted image:


The part I exposed to room light, film is not fully black.

 

[Augustus Caesar]

The results with very slow copy or technical film are generally disappointing. Better is to use one of the newer-generation T-grain films such as T-Max 100 or Delta 100. Very slow films have very restricted latitude.

 

[MCB18]

The results with very slow copy or technical film are generally disappointing. Better is to use one of the newer-generation T-grain films such as T-Max 100 or Delta 100. Very slow films have very restricted latitude.

That’s not really the point, yes I could absolutely do that but I’d rather mess around and see what I can get to work with this stuff.

 

[MCB18]

Ok, so developing a completely light struck section of this film in HC-110 B for 6 minutes shows the same density as the stuff developed in HW Control. I think this film just doesn’t turn completely black.

 

[Augustus Caesar]

That’s not really the point, yes I could absolutely do that but I’d rather mess around and see what I can get to work with this stuff.

Why? It's not worth the trouble.

 

[MCB18]

Why? It's not worth the trouble.

because I do this for fun? It’s not like I do this because I need to, if I need a picture I get out my phone and I take a picture. I am absolutely not looking for perfect results. I’m just having fun with some cheap film and a developer that I found online that’s meant to be used for film like this.

 

[MCB18]

Well, I gotta say, Foto-32 and H&W control is an amazing combination. I think CMS 20 II and tech pan still have it beat in terms of pure resolution, but I wouldn’t say it’s by that much! And, it’s at a relatively fast speed too, especially compared to something like CMS 20 II. Maybe still a bit contrasty for some folks, but I will definitely be using this combination more in the future. I really like the look.


Cropped to 250% to show detail: