Thank you Darko and MDR,
Darko, I watch movies rarely and I dont have any idea about what americans does today. But would it be cheaper to compose with tele lens ? You need only beatiful lady , no need to lighting expenses nor decor , other people. You would invest in few old cars and a stunt to explode the car or roll in the air. Thats cheapness. I am looking movie player sites and half of the movies are horror , other quarter they are in holiday , poor girl becomes a princess and sea side love stories and few political nine eleven movies. I would not watch them if they are deep focus or norrow focus.
MDR,
Thank you very much. I will watch the movies one by one.
Vertical is also not the best choice if you want to copy the movie deep focus effect as movies are shot in landscape orientation.
Did you mean vertical viewfinder. Toland used the same at Citizen Kane. I posted his equipment list at other thread.
The Leicashop sells a 2/25mm Gauss-Tachar for € 350
http://www.leicashop.com/vintage_en/...ku22240-6.html the lens should be very close to the 24mm.
I saw that lens , you were saying its Toland era cinema lens , isnt it ? Its about our govs decision to invest or not , I dont have still pension yet.
I will look in split diopter ? I never heard before.
I am looking for grades similar to 50s german magazine factory products ULF shots. Some bright , some darker sharper is neighbor to dull and low contrast or some flat look with long grades without change . These are the most dynamic ones I have ever seen. I think everything was under bright sun or light source. And I am looking for dusty grey noise and lots of blacks. There are few of my gallery shots.
Basically very good processed kodak or agfa film , some adox and rollei gives out similar with less agresssive development.