Grain on faces

Roses

A
Roses

  • 2
  • 0
  • 72
Rebel

A
Rebel

  • 4
  • 2
  • 92
Watch That First Step

A
Watch That First Step

  • 1
  • 0
  • 65
Barn Curves

A
Barn Curves

  • 2
  • 1
  • 59
Columbus Architectural Detail

A
Columbus Architectural Detail

  • 4
  • 2
  • 64

Forum statistics

Threads
197,489
Messages
2,759,846
Members
99,515
Latest member
falc
Recent bookmarks
0

pauldc

Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2005
Messages
188
Location
Kent, UK
Format
Multi Format
Hello everyone,

my name is Paul and I am new here but I have been following the forum for a couple of weeks and have learnt lots. This is my first post.

I just wanted to check my experience against those of others in the forum when working on 35mm enlargements up to 10*8. My experience is that I can get really quite sharp and grain free enlargements to this size for most subjects except those that feature people's faces when the face is quite a small part of the enlarged area. Typically I am describing environmental portraits of people that feature one or two individuals that also include their whole body. I guess the face area in these shots is from 1 inch square to even less. It is quite frustrating as the rest of the shot can be sharp and relatively grain free but the face (which of course is the main focal point!) has visible grain and looks far worse in terms of quality than the rest of the picture.

Now I know that smooth, even tones tend to show more grain than detail and texture. But using my same enalrgement technique for full frame faces does not reveal any grain in the same way on a person's skin. My question is, is this experience usual for people and something I will just have to accept as part of the 35mm compromise (because ironically it is when using 35mm cameras that I tend to get these type of shots rather than my more studied medium format shots) or is it the result of other factors such as errors in focus / exposure / my general technique. Any views gladly received!

In terms of materials I tend to use apx100 in rodinal (1+50) which, apart from small faces, I tend to find a remarkably grain free combination and FP4+ and Neopan 400 in Aculux II.

Best wishes

Paul
 

eatfrog

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2004
Messages
111
Location
Sweden
Format
35mm
APX100 and Rodinal 1+50 is terrible for portraits, the grain is very sharp and stands out on even lighter tones like sky or skin.

Try stock D76 or a film with smaller grain. Fp4+ has worked nicely for me.

/Henri
 

NikoSperi

Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
575
Location
Italy
Format
Multi Format
You have stumbled upon the very reason for the existence of the Banquet Camera. These were used to photograph large (very large) groups of people where photographers quickly stumbled upon the "too little real-estate" to resolve detail. If your subject's face occupies a sufficiently small area of the film, you may have an insufficient number of silver crystals to resolve the details. For groups of say a hundred people, a 35mm film frame may have one or two grains per face.

Asking your film to offer the fine grain to resolve something so small is also going to stretch your technique and lenses. If you have those, try some Technical Pan, or some Pan F.
 

psvensson

Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2004
Messages
623
Location
Queens, NY
Format
Medium Format
Ilford XP2 works well for this. Its grain diminishes with exposure. If you expose it at ISO 200, faces falling on zone VI will look very smooth. It's the lower tones that show grain.
 

Tom Stanworth

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2003
Messages
2,022
Format
Multi Format
psvensson said:
Ilford XP2 works well for this. Its grain diminishes with exposure. If you expose it at ISO 200, faces falling on zone VI will look very smooth. It's the lower tones that show grain.


well presented and very true.
 

gainer

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 20, 2002
Messages
3,703
If you are enamored of Rodinal, try adding 4 grams of sodium ascorbate to the liter of Rodinal 1+50 working solution. The developing time will be as for Rodinal 1+25. Grain will be somewhat finer.

Faces of the white race and blue sky with cumulus clouds are the tell-tales for grain.
 

titrisol

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
2,068
Location
UIO/ RDU / RTM/ POZ / GRU
Format
Multi Format
Oh yes master my master, that is fantastic.
You can also add ascorbate to 1+100 and use the 1+50 times.
It works great with EFKE films and JC Pro 100

gainer said:
If you are enamored of Rodinal, try adding 4 grams of sodium ascorbate to the liter of Rodinal 1+50 working solution. The developing time will be as for Rodinal 1+25. Grain will be somewhat finer.

Faces of the white race and blue sky with cumulus clouds are the tell-tales for grain.
 
OP
OP

pauldc

Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2005
Messages
188
Location
Kent, UK
Format
Multi Format
Thanks for the advice everyone, I think I will try the sodium ascorbate route first of all and have just ordered some from the net. Are there any trade-offs with using ascorbate - perhaps a small reduction in tonality or sharpness?

Paul
 

titrisol

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
2,068
Location
UIO/ RDU / RTM/ POZ / GRU
Format
Multi Format
If you can't get ascorbate use vitamin C, then add (very slowly) baking soda until the fizzing stops.
I'm using about 1/2 tsp of Vitamin C for 600 ml.
Then mix the rodinal in.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom