Stephanie Brim said:Eh. I've had mixed results. It seems that people either like Pan-F with Diafine or they don't. Most people on RFF tend to lean toward not liking it, while I found that I got acceptable results. I don't know how they'd print, but they scan well.
Bob F. said:Do you mean short-term temperature changes (as in a 5 degree change during a 15 minute period) or occasionally changing temperatures which remain constant for some hours?
You can process B&W film at a range of temperatures between 14 - 26 degrees C at least - film manufacturer's datasheets have charts that allow for different temperatures.
For short-term temperature fluctuations, fill a bucket or large bowl with water and keep the developing tank in it while not actually agitating it.
Cheers, Bob.
Ilford have a number of useful PDF documents on their site (www.ilfordphoto.com).After fixing [non-hardening fixer], fill the spiral tank with water at the
same temperature, +/ 5ºC (9ºF), as the
processing solutions and invert it five times. Drain
the water away and refill. Invert the tank ten times.
Once more drain the water away and refill.
Finally, invert the tank twenty times and drain the
water away.
mortimer said:Can anyone offer recommendations for film developers that can withstand temperatures that fluctuate by +/- 5 degrees C? With my current budget, new equipment isn't an option (which is why I'm switching from Provia to Pan-F), so I'm hoping there's something that will do a decent job with less than ideal conditions, and preferably something readily available (ie: Kodak or Ilford).
QUOTE]
As others have said, any developer will work within a small swing of 1/2-C. As long as that developer maintains that temperature throughout the time the film is in it. And subsequent liquids need to be in that range also.
I have been using Pan F+ and like the film a lot. I just processed a roll in the home brew equivalent of Kodaks' D-72 1+3, 14 Min., 20-c. The results are very good.
Bruce (Camclicker) said:mortimer said:I have been using Pan F+ and like the film a lot. I just processed a roll in the home brew equivalent of Kodaks' D-72 1+3, 14 Min., 20-c. The results are very good.
Hi Bruce,
Do you by chance mean a homebrew of D-7*6*? My time for Pan-F in D-76 1+3 is 15 min; close enough. I know some folks do process film in Dektol, D-72. Is that what you're doing? Simply curious.
CHOOSING THE BEST ILFORD DEVELOPER FOR THE JOB
Manual processing (eg spiral tank, dish/tray, deep tank) and rotary processors
Liquid Powder
Best overall image quality ILFOTEC DD-X ID-11 (stock)
Finest grain ILFOTEC DD-X PERCEPTOL (stock)
Maximum sharpness ILFOTEC DD-X ID-11 (1+3)
jim appleyard said:Bruce (Camclicker) said:Hi Bruce,
Do you by chance mean a homebrew of D-7*6*? My time for Pan-F in D-76 1+3 is 15 min; close enough. I know some folks do process film in Dektol, D-72. Is that what you're doing? Simply curious.
Yes I do/did mean D-76. Thanks for pointing that out, I would probably develop the next roll in D-72.
mortimer said:Thanks for all the tips, to everyone. I know this seems pretty basic for most of you, but for the past 9 years all I've been using is labs for c41 and e6, followed by scanners and photoshop, until the newspaper industry went entirely to the dark side. Photojournalism school doesn't really teach you much about darkroom work, even though I learned the basics on how to use one, so I'll apologize in advance for the other dumb questions I will undoubtedly ask related to darkrooms as I stumble through remembering the little I once knew and adding to that with what I'll learn along the way.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?