Going JOBO

pasopvoordehondkl.jpg

A
pasopvoordehondkl.jpg

  • 0
  • 0
  • 120
<--

D
<--

  • 3
  • 0
  • 167
The Bank

A
The Bank

  • 0
  • 1
  • 247
Kildare

A
Kildare

  • 1
  • 0
  • 467
Sonatas XII-27 (Homes)

A
Sonatas XII-27 (Homes)

  • 0
  • 1
  • 562

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,321
Messages
2,789,587
Members
99,871
Latest member
semdot14
Recent bookmarks
0

Rolleijoe

Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2004
Messages
524
Location
S.E. Texas
Format
Medium Format
Hi, I'm finally taking the plunge and going with JOBO after more than 20+ years using Patterson. I understand that I'll be using MUCH less chemistry, but how do I figure out how much of what I'll be using? Any & all help appreciated!

Thanks,

Rolleijoe
 

resummerfield

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 28, 2005
Messages
1,467
Location
Alaska
Format
Multi Format
I process in the 2500 series tanks, and use 170ml for each 35mmm roll, and 210ml for each 120. Thats with the 2553 and 2563 tanks, but I think it would also work with the smaller 2 reel tanks.

For times, start with about 10% less, and adjust.
 

C Rose

Member
Joined
May 5, 2005
Messages
28
Location
Southern CA.
Format
Multi Format
The chemistry amount should be listed on the selected JOBO tank you are using.... for the format of film you are processing. Are you going constant agitation? I process in varying JOBO's with constant agitation and have been very happy with results thus far. So little chem. needed at high dilution, nice..... HC110 at 1:50ml

Good luck
Cynthia
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Jan 17, 2005
Messages
1,355
Location
Downers Grov
Pay attention to the mimimum chemistry to get the job done. With dilute developers and low volume, there may be insufficient chemical.
 

Nick Zentena

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2004
Messages
4,666
Location
Italia
Format
Multi Format
They only use less chemicals if you rotate the tank. The 2500 tanks use alot of chemicals if you try inversion.
 

Mark Layne

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 9, 2003
Messages
967
Location
Nova Scotia
Format
Medium Format
For 35 and 120 I went to back to Patterson tanks.
I did not like the lack of acutance I found with constant agitation.
Doesn't seem to matter as much with larger film
Mark
 
OP
OP
Rolleijoe

Rolleijoe

Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2004
Messages
524
Location
S.E. Texas
Format
Medium Format
HC-110 @ 1:50

C Rose said:
The chemistry amount should be listed on the selected JOBO tank you are using.... for the format of film you are processing. Are you going constant agitation? I process in varying JOBO's with constant agitation and have been very happy with results thus far. So little chem. needed at high dilution, nice..... HC110 at 1:50

Good luck
Cynthia
Hi Cynthia, thanks for the information. I haven't received the equipment yet (buying from a gentleman selling off his entire darkroom, which seems now to be mine). I had thought that the reason for JOBO was constant agitation? I guess there's going to be a long learning curve in sight!

I also use HC-110 @1:50. But if I mix up that much, won't I be wasting so much of it if I'm only using mL?? I always use it as 1 shot, so maybe I should wait until I have enougn to use all 50oz? But that would take forever.

I'm shooting mostly 120 Rolleiflex, and occasional 4x5. I know I'll have to do some experimenting, as I go along. Thanks again.
 

Wally H

Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2004
Messages
160
Location
...
Format
Med. Format RF
The correct amount of chemical "may" not be what is listed on the JOBO tank(s)... some developers work better when more chemical is used (such as some diluted ones)... I use a developer that suggests that 500ml be used per roll... If you "DO" go that route (larger amounts) be aware that some JOBO tanks do not hold that much developer... In my case, I use a larger tank with empty reels when I only have one roll to process...
 

C Rose

Member
Joined
May 5, 2005
Messages
28
Location
Southern CA.
Format
Multi Format
Hey Rolliejoe
I use ml dilution 1:50 so I only mix up what i'm use each time as well. As far as not having enough chem in the tank I have not yet run into that problem as Wally states above. I am aware that it may be a concern.... but for now it has not been a problem.
I've been mostly processing med. format tri-x. but I'm experimenting with Efke now
BTW love the HC110

-Cynthia
 

Tom Hoskinson

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
3,867
Location
Southern Cal
Format
Multi Format
C Rose said:
Hey Rolliejoe
I use ml dilution 1:50 so I only mix up what i'm use each time as well. As far as not having enough chem in the tank I have not yet run into that problem as Wally states above. I am aware that it may be a concern.... but for now it has not been a problem.
I've been mostly processing med. format tri-x. but I'm experimenting with Efke now
BTW love the HC110

-Cynthia

You may not know if you are using the optimal amount of chemistry - and rotational speed (for continuous rotary processing) unless you do controlled comparitive testing.

My Jobo system has been sitting unused (for about 5 years now). I process all my B&W film (35mm thru 8x10 sheet) in tubes, tanks and trays using minimal and semi-stand agitation.

I'll go back to the Jobo if I start processing color again.
 

fhovie

Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2003
Messages
1,250
Location
Powell Wyoming
Format
Large Format
It really is very expensive to try to save money on chemistry by using too little - I use the Jobo 2500 series for 4x5 and multiple rolls of 120. I use it for hand inversion and it takes 1.25L to completely cover the sheet film. Using PMK, Pyrocat or most other one shot developers, this is not expensive compared to ruining the film with over tired developer or with uneven staining. Same with fixer - better more than less.
 

Frank F

Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2003
Messages
59
Location
California
Format
4x5 Format
Rolleijoe said:


I also use HC-110 @1:50. But if I mix up that much, won't I be wasting so much of it if I'm only using mL?? I always use it as 1 shot, so maybe I should wait until I have enougn to use all 50oz? But that would take forever.

Some users get a hypodermic like device to measure small volumes of HC110.

Or get a .. now I forget the name of the thing..... a really small graduated tube that requires suction ( a small rubber bulb) to get the chemical up there and measured. They cost around $1, and are reuseable....they meaure in quantities of 1-10mL.
 

Bruce Osgood

Membership Council
Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2002
Messages
2,642
Location
Brooklyn, N.Y.
Format
Multi Format
Frank F said:
Some users get a hypodermic like device to measure small volumes of HC110.

Or get a .. now I forget the name of the thing..... a really small graduated tube that requires suction ( a small rubber bulb) to get the chemical up there and measured. They cost around $1, and are reuseable....they meaure in quantities of 1-10mL.

Pipette.
There are two types. The one I have is 10mL and you fill it to 10 and release to the amount you want. It is graduated from 0 to 10 down. There is another type that works in the opposite - you fill TO the amount you want. 1 -10 UP.

If you buy the mechanical pump kind you are speaking of BIG bucks. Mine is a plastic pipette with bulb and cost under $10. I just don't remember where I bought it.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom