Glass negative carrier

Near my home.jpg

A
Near my home.jpg

  • 5
  • 1
  • 61
Woodland Shoppers

A
Woodland Shoppers

  • 1
  • 0
  • 43
On The Mound

A
On The Mound

  • 0
  • 2
  • 60
What's Shakin'?

A
What's Shakin'?

  • 5
  • 1
  • 55

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,471
Messages
2,775,629
Members
99,624
Latest member
Seanusmaximus
Recent bookmarks
0

Jas

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2009
Messages
13
Format
35mm
Hello everyone,
I am having problems with my negatives popping under the enlarger, and I am wondering if I should spring for a glass neg carrier, or would that just drive me even more crazy. Thoughts?
 

Colin Corneau

Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2007
Messages
2,366
Location
Winnipeg MB Canada
Format
35mm RF
If you get one make sure it's anti-Newton glass - otherwise you'll spend a bunch of money and only have little marks and circles on your prints to show for it.

Not that I did that, or anything, to find out the hard way....
 
Joined
Mar 17, 2004
Messages
726
Location
Wilmette,Ill
Format
Multi Format
I use a full glass carrier for 4x5 negatives and am happy to spend the short time it takes to make sure it is clean. On smaller formats such as 6x7 and 135, I use a 1/2 glass carrier where there is glass on top of the negative, but the bottom of the carrier is open. Having 2 glass surfaces to keep dust free instead of 4 does make life a bit easier. I use a Durst 1200 enlarger and it is easy to pop glass and negative holders in and out to configure the carrier any way I need. If this is not an option for you I would suggest using whatever glass carrier you can, as I have found the benefits to greatly outweigh any inconvenience.

Richard Wasserman
 

John Bragg

Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
1,039
Location
Cornwall, UK
Format
35mm
I would say yes, get one. Use anti newton glass on the top and clear glass underneath. Just needs more care with dusting as there are 4 more surfaces brought into play. The reward is perfectly flat negatives during printing and no more popping negatives. I have used one for years and wouldn't go back to glassless.
 

Anscojohn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Messages
2,704
Format
Medium Format
You do not say what is making the negs pop. If it is too much heat from the light source, a heat absorbing glass might be an option.
 

PVia

Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2006
Messages
1,057
Location
Pasadena, CA
Format
Multi Format
I would say yes, get one. Use anti newton glass on the top and clear glass underneath. Just needs more care with dusting as there are 4 more surfaces brought into play. The reward is perfectly flat negatives during printing and no more popping negatives. I have used one for years and wouldn't go back to glassless.

Would I be able to use a piece of etched or sandblasted glass on top?
 

L Gebhardt

Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2003
Messages
2,363
Location
NH
Format
Large Format
Would I be able to use a piece of etched or sandblasted glass on top?

I don't know about sand blasted or etched glass, but I suspect you would see the pattern. You could try Prazio Anti-Newton spray. It's a fine powder that sticks to film or glass. I would try it on the glass. I have some that came in a Prazio Trial kit for drum scanning. It works fine on film mounted on the scanner so I suspect it will work fine on the glass. Still I would, and did, get anti-newton class for the negative carrier.
 
OP
OP

Jas

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2009
Messages
13
Format
35mm
Thanks for the replies folks,
I recently changed film developers and as a result my negatives take a longer exposure under the enlarger. As a result, the heat from the bulb is causing the negs to pop, in spite of all my precautions. I have a Beseler enlarger and I believe they only sell one anti-newton type carrier. I like the idea of only one piece of glass to deal with. I wonder if I could remove the bottom glass from the carrier.
 

Konical

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 1, 2003
Messages
1,824
Good Morning, Jas,

Since you have a Beseler enlarger, consider getting a Negaflat carrier (Negatrans for 35mm) instead of a glass carrier. It is difficult to imagine that anything could hold a negative much flatter than a Negaflat. Negaflat usage requires only the dusting of the negative, not the four additional surfaces a glass carrier has.

Konical
 

David Brown

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2004
Messages
4,049
Location
Earth
Format
Multi Format
What do yall mean by popping?

The negative will buckle, or "pop" due to too much heat from the enlarger head. Much as slides do in a projector. (You may or may not know about that circumstance either.) This, off course, makes the image go out of focus. Whether or not the neg is damaged depends on the amount of heat and the length of time.
 

Jon Shiu

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 2, 2003
Messages
3,293
Location
Mendocino, California
Format
Plastic Cameras
Hi, I've used the beseler 6x9 glass carrier on the 23C enlarger and didn't have much problem with dust. It is really not a big problem as people fear. I highly recommend it to keep your negs flat and in focus. You can take out the glass, but then film will not be supported, so it wouldn't work.

You can use a regular (glassless) carrier with a piece of AN glass from a gepe slide mount taped to inside of the upper frame. Make sure to sand the edges of the glass so it won't scratch the film

Jon
 

John W

Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2008
Messages
128
Location
Seattle, WA
Format
4x5 Format
I've used the LPL 4x5 glass carriers before, and they're a joy. No undue dust problems. but then again that darkroom has compressed air plumbed everywhere which makes life easier in that regard.
 

Anscojohn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Messages
2,704
Format
Medium Format
Thanks for the replies folks,
I recently changed film developers and as a result my negatives take a longer exposure under the enlarger. As a result, the heat from the bulb is causing the negs to pop, in spite of all my precautions. I have a Beseler enlarger and I believe they only sell one anti-newton type carrier. I like the idea of only one piece of glass to deal with. I wonder if I could remove the bottom glass from the carrier.
*****
You don't say what enlarger and what size negs. I can make up to one minute exposures with a Beseler 67S dichro head with no problems. And as I mentioned, you might just need a heat-absorbing glass under your light source if it is a tungsten bulb. You don't really say.
 

Konical

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 1, 2003
Messages
1,824
Good Evening Jas,

What John says also goes for me with the condenser-head Beseler 45 enlarger. Never a problem, even with standard negative carriers which I used for decades before acquiring both a Negatrans and a Negaflat. I've always used the heat absorbing glass which came with the enlarger.

Konical
 
OP
OP

Jas

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2009
Messages
13
Format
35mm
Ok, I want that enlarger (the Beseler 45). Mine is the 23c model, not nearly as fancy. I print mostly 35mm with an occasional 2 1/4. Heat absorbing glass, I like that idea.
 

Anscojohn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Messages
2,704
Format
Medium Format
Ok, I want that enlarger (the Beseler 45). Mine is the 23c model, not nearly as fancy. I print mostly 35mm with an occasional 2 1/4. Heat absorbing glass, I like that idea.
******
That's why the heat aborbing glass comes with some enlargers. The condensors sometimes act as a heat absorbing glass, but some enlargers need the real thing. I do not know enough about physics to know what makes for a heat-absorbing glass, but it is special, I guess.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom