Glamour Photography Magazine Summer 1957...NSFW-ish

CMoore

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 23, 2015
Messages
6,192
Location
USA CA
Format
35mm
Wow.!
Film photography and "real" sex-appeal. I should have been born sooner.
Thanks for posting, i will definitely have to read that link.
 

Old-N-Feeble

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
6,809
Location
South Texas
Format
Multi Format
Oh my goodness... the USA was so naughty back then.
 

Theo Sulphate

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
6,492
Location
Gig Harbor
Format
Multi Format
Old-N-Feeble said:
Oh my goodness... the USA was so naughty back then.
Click to expand...

Funny thing is, if you look back at early 1960's Popular Photography, for example, you will see advertisements that have full frontal nudity as well as rear-al (?) nudity. It was not a controversial matter. Yet, as time passed the ads became more restrained, no longer any nudity, and some people would write complaint letters to the editor over the silhouette of a breast or somesuch.
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,844
Format
Hybrid
LOL
too funny
these are all model mayham models but in in 57-ish !
 
Last edited:

Helios 1984

Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2015
Messages
1,844
Location
Saint-Constant, Québec
Format
35mm
Old-N-Feeble said:
Oh my goodness... the USA was so naughty back then.
Click to expand...

Just listen to some of Sinatra’s songs, “Night & Day” and “South of the Border” among others. The old days were indeed naughty.
 

mark

Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2003
Messages
5,699
I’m trying to figure out what they mean by packing a boodle bag.
 

CMoore

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 23, 2015
Messages
6,192
Location
USA CA
Format
35mm
Born2Late said:
What do think they would say about the "MeToo" movement?
Click to expand...
As noted previously, really not clear what point you are tying to make, but.........If you are referring to "The Models" in the magazine, i would say they would be 100% in agreement.
Wouldn't you.?
The rape and abuse of women was much more "accepted" in 1957 than it is now. Women had Much Less Power/Sway in life then than they do now.
If you are talking about they way they are Dressed/Dressing.......that Rarely has Anything to do with why a Woman/Girl is raped.
What a woman wears should Never give anybody any kind of bizarre justification for abusing them.
What a woman does for money, including being a stripper or a prostitute, is Never any kind of bizarre excuse for somebody to abuse them.
If none of that addresses your point than i have no clue as to what point you are trying to make.
 
OP
OP

slackercrurster

Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2017
Messages
908
Location
L.A. - NYC - Rustbelt
Format
Multi Format
Women, girls are taught from a young age to seek attention...



And goddamn..the hetero male loves giving their girls attention. But like any other love object, we buff it up a little too much sometimes.

Yes, without the gals, it would be a hell-hole on earth for the hetero male.

 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,990
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
Wayne said:
Cant imagine why anyone would object to women being stalked like wild game, and being "cornered" and closed in on for "the kill".
Click to expand...

Well, it takes two to tango. And as anything else one should try to see thinks from the perspective of then.


(By the way, when today I comment on terms of today as shooting and shooter with respect to photography, I am still ridiculed.)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…