Glamour Photography Magazine Summer 1957...NSFW-ish

[DDTJRAC]

The great cross-country girl hunt. 68 pages

https://photographysgoldenage.wordpress.com/2018/09/27/glamour-photography-magazine-1957/

 

[CMoore]

Wow.!
Film photography and "real" sex-appeal. I should have been born sooner.
Thanks for posting, i will definitely have to read that link.

 

[Old-N-Feeble]

Oh my goodness... the USA was so naughty back then.

 

[Theo Sulphate]

Oh my goodness... the USA was so naughty back then.

Funny thing is, if you look back at early 1960's Popular Photography, for example, you will see advertisements that have full frontal nudity as well as rear-al (?) nudity. It was not a controversial matter. Yet, as time passed the ads became more restrained, no longer any nudity, and some people would write complaint letters to the editor over the silhouette of a breast or somesuch.

 

[DDTJRAC]

Wow.!
Film photography and "real" sex-appeal. I should have been born sooner.
Thanks for posting, i will definitely have to read that link.

Yes, I'd like to go back in time to shoot the old time Jazz greats.

 

[removed account4]

LOL
too funny
these are all model mayham models but in in 57-ish !

 

[DDTJRAC]

LOL
too funny
these are all model mayham models but in in 57-ish !

I wonder if the models were as flaky back then?

 

[Helios 1984]

Oh my goodness... the USA was so naughty back then.

Just listen to some of Sinatra’s songs, “Night & Day” and “South of the Border” among others. The old days were indeed naughty.

 

[Born2Late]

What do think they would say about the "MeToo" movement?

 

[mark]

I’m trying to figure out what they mean by packing a boodle bag.

 

[dmr]

How quaint!

 

[marcuspaulobr]

omg!!

 

[DDTJRAC]

What do think they would say about the "MeToo" movement?

Who would say?

The photogs? The models? Me Too'ers?

 

[hoffy]

What a find!

Is that your blog?

 

[Born2Late]

Who would say?

The photogs? The models? Me Too'ers?

Mainly the folks that preach tolerance but will have non of it in their own lives.

 

[Wayne]

Who would say?

The photogs? The models? Me Too'ers?

Cant imagine why anyone would object to women being stalked like wild game, and being "cornered" and closed in on for "the kill".

 

[DDTJRAC]

What a find!

Is that your blog?

Yes, one of 80+ of them.

 

[DDTJRAC]

Women thrive on it. Trained from an early age to attract attention.

 

[CMoore]

What do think they would say about the "MeToo" movement?

As noted previously, really not clear what point you are tying to make, but.........If you are referring to "The Models" in the magazine, i would say they would be 100% in agreement.
Wouldn't you.?
The rape and abuse of women was much more "accepted" in 1957 than it is now. Women had Much Less Power/Sway in life then than they do now.
If you are talking about they way they are Dressed/Dressing.......that Rarely has Anything to do with why a Woman/Girl is raped.
What a woman wears should Never give anybody any kind of bizarre justification for abusing them.
What a woman does for money, including being a stripper or a prostitute, is Never any kind of bizarre excuse for somebody to abuse them.
If none of that addresses your point than i have no clue as to what point you are trying to make.

 

[Wayne]

Cant imagine why anyone would object to women being stalked like wild game, and being "cornered" and closed in on for "the kill".

Women thrive on it. Trained from an early age to attract attention.

I assume you're responding to my post so I'll just put them together.

 

[DDTJRAC]

Women, girls are taught from a young age to seek attention...

And goddamn..the hetero male loves giving their girls attention. But like any other love object, we buff it up a little too much sometimes.

Yes, without the gals, it would be a hell-hole on earth for the hetero male.

 

[AgX]

Cant imagine why anyone would object to women being stalked like wild game, and being "cornered" and closed in on for "the kill".

Well, it takes two to tango. And as anything else one should try to see thinks from the perspective of then.


(By the way, when today I comment on terms of today as shooting and shooter with respect to photography, I am still ridiculed.)