Getting good photos of the moon

$12.66

A
$12.66

  • 5
  • 3
  • 103
A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 1
  • 0
  • 136
A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 2
  • 2
  • 126
img746.jpg

img746.jpg

  • 6
  • 0
  • 106
No Hall

No Hall

  • 1
  • 4
  • 119

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,797
Messages
2,781,031
Members
99,707
Latest member
lakeside
Recent bookmarks
0

IloveTLRs

Member
Joined
May 22, 2007
Messages
1,132
Location
Boston
Format
Sub 35mm
I want to get some good photos of the moon and with the moon in them. Previously when I was on the Dark Side I tried a few times and failed miserably :rolleyes:

With previous attempts the moon almost always came out as a white blob. I've tried shooting wide open and closed down but no dice. I'm trying to get photos of it where you can see details. Is that possible without a telescope? (I have no way of getting one.)

I have had limited semi-success taking photos of the moon while the sky is still blueish, but at night, no luck at all.

I found this site: http://home.hiwaay.net/~krcool/Astro/moon/howtophoto/ which is pretty good, but I'm wondering if anyone here has some insider secrets?
 

unhinged

Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2007
Messages
48
Location
London
Format
35mm RF
I think it's in this one of his books that Bryan Peterson explains how to get god pictures of the moon. He also goes on to explain about lots of other stuff like pictures in the snow and how the (automatic) cameras are fooled etc. Sorry it doesn't directly answer your question.
 

Akki14

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2007
Messages
1,874
Location
London, UK
Format
4x5 Format
sunny-16 plus a giant zoom lens. I tried photoing the lunar eclipse with my 200mm lens and it came out to be a speck. A speck with details once I set up the enlarged to print it as big as possible, but still a speck (and a 1inch moon that took 1minute to expose on the paper... and supergrainy.)
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,974
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
"Moony-11" I find.
 

Ole

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 9, 2002
Messages
9,244
Location
Bergen, Norway
Format
Large Format
"Moony-11" is about right - but "Fullmoon-16". At full moon the moon is a bit over a full stop brighter than a day (or night) before or after.

The size of the moon on the film is about 1mm per 100mm focal length, so with a 200mm lens you get a 2mm moon.

Time to bring out the really big lenses - except that the moon moves, and the longer the focal length the faster your shutter time must be. 2000mm f:2.8, anyone? :D
 

keithwms

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2006
Messages
6,220
Location
Charlottesvi
Format
Multi Format
Sunny 16 or luny 11 do not necessarily work. The luminosity that we read on earth depends quite lot on the moon's phase, and on atmospheric scattering which is of course a function of many things. Just spot meter or bracket judiciously!

One other thing, in my experience, for a frame-filling shot you are probably going to need shutter speed of around 1/320 or so. It moves surprisingly quickly!
 

TheFlyingCamera

Membership Council
Advertiser
Joined
May 24, 2005
Messages
11,546
Location
Washington DC
Format
Multi Format
I suppose then I could use my 39" element of my convertible Rapid Rectilinear (I think the max on that element is either f16 or f22) if I made a converter back to allow me to mount my 35mm body on my 11x14. Combine that with one of those motorized equatorial mounts for a telescope and I'm in the ballpark to get a frame-filling shot of the moon?
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2007
Messages
907
Location
Nanaimo, Bri
Format
35mm
A 75" - 80" lens would be closer, and that's just for 35mm. Just for kicks, if you wanted to shoot a full-frame moon on your 11x14 with an inch to spare you would need a 1000" lens. At f/4 the diaphragm opening of such a lens would be nearly 90"! That is, if my math is right...

- Justin
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,974
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
If you search on "moon" in the galleries, you'll turn up some good examples with technical information, like this one--

(there was a url link here which no longer exists)

It's mentioned in the comments to this image that there is another thread on this topic somewhere, so try the search engine, and you might find more good info.
 

richard ide

Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2005
Messages
1,217
Location
Wellington C
Format
Multi Format
IIRC The only practical way to get a large image of the moon on film is to have a setup where you can focus the image from the eyepiece of a telescope onto the film. I have set up my 1200mm Apo Tessar outside pointing at the moon and lay on the ground just looking through a microscope eyepiece. The image was too big to view the whole moon at once.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,365
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Search APUG for my previous posts of exposure settings for the Moon. The postings discuss using Sunny-11 to account for the albedo and slowest shutter speeds that can be used to stop the Moon's orbital motion [1 degree/ 4 minutes] for various focal lengths.

Steve
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom