Funky Dev Marks

250swb

Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
1,529
Location
Peak District
Format
Multi Format
Wetting agent takes only a tiny bit to influence the Walter's surface tension. I can imagine this plays a role in this specific case. I agree it's a long shot, but do you have any better ideas?

I'm asking you for your better ideas, I mean if second hand wetting agent was involved how would it make specific runs down the film and not disperse?
 

250swb

Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
1,529
Location
Peak District
Format
Multi Format

You mean like it was raining inside the camera? That's something we haven't thought of before The best thing that can happen here is for the OP to process another batch and it all turns out ok.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,945
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
You mean like it was raining inside the camera? That's something we haven't thought of before The best thing that can happen here is for the OP to process another batch and it all turns out ok.

I agree with your second sentence I wasn't able to get the connection between what I said and raining inside the camera

Your point was what, exactly?

pentaxuser
 

250swb

Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
1,529
Location
Peak District
Format
Multi Format
I agree with your second sentence I wasn't able to get the connection between what I said and raining inside the camera

Your point was what, exactly?

pentaxuser

Sorry if you missed OP's opening post but it was something purely observational given the streaks look like water streaming down a pane of glass etc. As you were blaming the faults on the camera my aside must have confused you no end.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…