Fujinon-C 450mm vs Nikkor 450mm lens?

Jekyll driftwood

H
Jekyll driftwood

  • 1
  • 0
  • 32
It's also a verb.

D
It's also a verb.

  • 3
  • 0
  • 36
The Kildare Track

A
The Kildare Track

  • 12
  • 4
  • 123
Stranger Things.

A
Stranger Things.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 85

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,916
Messages
2,783,080
Members
99,745
Latest member
Javier Tello
Recent bookmarks
0

User Removed

Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2004
Messages
1,296
Format
Plastic Cameras
Im sure this has been debated a number of times, but I wanted to get some fresh information of these two lenses from people that have used one or both of them.

I am planning to get one or the other to use on my new 11x14 camera.

The fujinon-C 450mm F/12.5 is in a copal 1 shutter and acording to the company, has greater coverage then the Nikkor. It is also ligher.

The Nikkor 450mm F/9 is in a copal 3 shutter and acording to the manufacture, has less coverage then the Fuji lens. I have heard that the Nikkor has more coverage then what they say though.

I have also heard that the Fuji tends to get darker on the outside of the lens, where the Nikkor does not.

Well, any comments would be of help! Remember, this is being used on an 11x14 camera.

Thanks,

Ryan McIntosh
www.RyanMcIntosh.net
 

Donsta

Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2004
Messages
191
Format
Multi Format
Ryan

I own both. They both cover 12x20 (which is much more coverage than the manufacturere's specs suggest), but the Nikkor allows for some movement on 12x20 - the Fuji does not. In terms of image quality, I cannot pic them - I have looked at 4X5 chromes with a 10x loupe of the same scene and they are both equally excellent. The Nikkor seems to be more highly sort after for ULF than the Fujinon - it has a couple of inches more coverage. I'm not sure what you shoot, but if you need a lot of movement on your 11x14, I'd recommend the Nikkor purely based on extra coverage. You will however be very satisfied with the Fujinon's coverage for most landscape applications.
 
Joined
Jul 13, 2004
Messages
46
Location
Lincolnshire
Format
ULarge Format
Ryan,

I debated between the lenses for my 14x17 & went for the Nikkor due to the extra coverage it gives. The Fuji is smaller & lighter, so if you intend going walkabout with your 11x14 go for the Fuji.

Andy
 

matt miller

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 11, 2004
Messages
824
Location
Iowa
Format
Multi Format
Do you use filters much? What size do you have now?

The Nikkor is a stop brighter on the gg.
 

Dave Wooten

Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2004
Messages
2,723
Location
Vegas/myster
Format
ULarge Format
Ryan,


I went with the fugi and use it on the 7 x 17 plenty of movement at 450 mm it has been bright enough for my old eyes, and if you remember my sweatshirt-jacket is my dark cloth...I like it on 8 x 10 and also 5 x 7 and 4 x 5....it is razor sharp....it reportedly,(contrary to some manufacturers reports) does have less coverage than the Nikor....but in my case has always been more than adequate....7 x 17...should be fine for 11 x 14...it's lightweight, compact design can be advantageous, glad to see you have moved away from that 8 x 10 point and shoot.. BTW your 210 Sironar will work on 11 x 14 for close portraits, pulling the bellows...

cheers

Dave
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom