It may be that Fuji sees a small market for film MF as others are dropping their film cameras.
In case anyone's wondering, there's a picture of the GX680 here: http://www.fujigx680forum.com/ I saw one in person (the III) a few months ago- it's a real monster. It's larger than an RB67.
I'm a big fan of Fujifilm, but after having a GS645S and (thankfully) trading it in for a Mamiya M645, I'm not overly-exited about anymore of their cameras.
I have a Fuji GX680III, I can not imagine using it handheld, except maybe if you're shooting fashion and using strobes...
Fuji actually made a 6x8, not 6x7.
Then they had all of those 645 range finders.
Good point. Since Fuji still makes 120 film - it's only logical that, if no one else does if for them, then they should make a platform on which to use it!
A scaled down version of the GX680, like the RB in size and weight, would be interesting.
I prefer the 6x8 format.
Why a 6X8 rather than 6X7 or 6X9?
Isn't there a Mamiya 6x8 motorized back for the RB/RZ? Doesn't have the movements of the GX680, but it would be a 6x8 the size of an RB/RZ.
Wasn't the Xpan killed off because it had lead solder in the computer board?
Wasn't the Xpan killed off because it had lead solder in the computer board?
Is the GX680 the largest-heaviest hand held MF camera?
There was at least one studio photographer in Japan that used it that way (forgot his name). He must have had big arms.
I have a Fuji GX680III, I can not imagine using it handheld, except maybe if you're shooting fashion and using strobes. It is far too heavy and bulky to use with anything short of the fastest shutter speeds. The way to use it handheld is to have the camera strap take much of the weight and use the waist level finder. Still this camera screams, "tripod".
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?