Or perhaps they have worked through their existing stocks and this is what it is going to cost to make film on a going forward basis.Is Fuji perhaps trying to kill sales so that they can "justify" discontinuing products?

They began with that procedure you think so with this film GRHazelton (years ago) :Is Fuji perhaps trying to kill sales so that they can "justify" discontinuing products?
!
!
!
!

!
!
!Geez, soon to be $90 for a 35mm pro pack and $60 for a 120 pro pack of Provia. I'm beginning to think they really don't want to make film any more and are just pricing everyone out of the market so they can say that no one was buying it.
Concur...but who really knows what Fuji has in mind.
What are the % of profits that film provides for Fuji? Is it even a big deal to them any more?
!!!!mshchem - they do indeed something else (beside high tech section) to the disadvantage (and in opposition) to their film division.Low volume specialty product. Hard for a young person to get excited about film at these prices. Fuji is gonna make money or do something else.




Low volume specialty product. Hard for a young person to get excited about film at these prices. Fuji is gonna make money or do something else.
Yes, Fujifilm is a very well managed company. It really goes back more than 50 years. Fujifilm stays competitive in every market where they are involved. Kodak gave up on professional cameras in the 50's. Kodak had a virtual monopoly of film and paper in the US until Fujifilm came in strong in the 70's. Fujifilm is doing the right thing even if it hurts some of us film fans.Sure! Absolutely! They could produce printers, like Kodak did! (Before they went belly up, with the film product line among the few remaining profitable ones) Or ... they could make printer cartridges? What could possibly go wrong, Tetenal did the same thing! (Before they went belly up, too, with photo chemistry product line among the few remaining profitable ones).
Kodak and Tetenal were not poorly managed until they tried to break out of their core market to start something more flashy, both companies wasting huge efforts and big money on these new product lines until they came crashing down. Both companies now emerge from the rubble, closing down all kinds of product lines, but not the analog photography product lines which they wanted to abandon initially.Yes, Fujifilm is a very well managed company.
Fujifilm is doing the right thing even if it hurts some of us film fans.
Also by not "dumping" products at very low margins it provides opportunities for Alaris, Ilford, Foma, Adox etc. There's not enough volume to support Fujichrome and Ektachrome. Need to see what happens.
I think we will have to agree to disagree on the Kodak management model.Kodak and Tetenal were not poorly managed until they tried to break out of their core market to start something more flashy, both companies wasting huge efforts and big money on these new product lines until they came crashing down. Both companies now emerge from the rubble, closing down all kinds of product lines, but not the analog photography product lines which they wanted to abandon initially.
After E100VS was cancelled by Kodak several years ago, and when my frozen stash started showing signs of deterioration, I started looking at Fuji Velvia 100 as replacement, and I actually started liking it. Now E100 is back, and it's already 15-20% cheaper than V100, i.e. before the 30% price hike just announced on top of this, and people say that 120 format E100 is around the corner .... I think I can fill your "need to see what happens" ...
PS: Ilford, Foma and Adox don't compete directly with Fuji's current product line, there is no overlap.
When my Father hit the job market in the early 1930s with a new BS in ChemEng from Detroit City College, now Wayne State U, he got a job with J L Hudson, a giant department store in Detroit. His job was compound/mixing cold cream. He said the only difference between the "plain Jane" version and the expensive stuff was the packaging and perfume. Hardly a surprise!Fuji DID say that the cosmetics technology came out of the research on preservation to keep colour film dyes stable! Hard to say if cosmetics are subsidising film, or visa versa. BUT cosmetics tend to have much higher margins than any other product.
My Dad was a Pharmacist, graduated from University of Iowa in 1941. He made cold cream and Xray developer for the state hospital, he was involved with the navy for a few years, came back and started as a analytical chemist.When my Father hit the job market in the early 1930s with a new BS in ChemEng from Detroit City College, now Wayne State U, he got a job with J L Hudson, a giant department store in Detroit. His job was compound/mixing cold cream. He said the only difference between the "plain Jane" version and the expensive stuff was the packaging and perfume. Hardly a surprise!

| Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |
