Fuji to bring back B&W film ?

Signs & fragments

A
Signs & fragments

  • 1
  • 0
  • 10
Summer corn, summer storm

D
Summer corn, summer storm

  • 1
  • 1
  • 23
Horizon, summer rain

D
Horizon, summer rain

  • 0
  • 0
  • 29
$12.66

A
$12.66

  • 6
  • 5
  • 167
A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 1
  • 0
  • 163

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,814
Messages
2,781,224
Members
99,710
Latest member
LibbyPScott
Recent bookmarks
0

RattyMouse

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
6,045
Location
Ann Arbor, Mi
Format
Multi Format
I like the haptics of my XE2 and XT2. They handle like my film cameras so it's easy for me to move back and forth. Is there another camera that still has an aperture ring on the lens?

To me, having a fake aperture ring (it's not connected to the aperture) is a vastly overrated aspect of the camera. I can shoot just fine from a dial. It makes no difference to me.
 
OP
OP

Ste_S

Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2017
Messages
396
Location
Birmingham, UK
Format
Multi Format
I like the haptics of my XE2 and XT2. They handle like my film cameras so it's easy for me to move back and forth. Is there another camera that still has an aperture ring on the lens?

Shoot Nikon and use manual focus, or the original auto-focus glass with the aperture ring ?

To me, having a fake aperture ring (it's not connected to the aperture) is a vastly overrated aspect of the camera. I can shoot just fine from a dial. It makes no difference to me.

I don't mind dials... as long as i'm not having to use them in combo with a button press. I've got a Canon EOS 300x which I'm probably going to end up getting rid of - one dial only (and a tiny viewfinder)
 

cmacd123

Subscriber
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
4,312
Location
Stittsville, Ontario
Format
35mm
. I've got a Canon EOS 300x which I'm probably going to end up getting rid of - one dial only (and a tiny viewfinder)

the "rebel T2" is a slightly later version. I find the Rebel Ti to be slightly nicer to use, while being the same basic unit
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
5,462
Location
.
Format
Digital
Kumar,
If people here on Photrio were serious about using ACROS 100, they would have cleaned out your entire stock offering of this particular film on your separate thread.
Apparently though that hasn't happened.
 

BMbikerider

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
2,948
Location
UK
Format
35mm

RattyMouse

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
6,045
Location
Ann Arbor, Mi
Format
Multi Format
Kumar,
If people here on Photrio were serious about using ACROS 100, they would have cleaned out your entire stock offering of this particular film on your separate thread.
Apparently though that hasn't happened.

Here's half of what I bought last week.

43641364311_2f67d8989b_b.jpg
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,918
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
If Kodachrome ever appeared again, most likely it would be due to some change in the current reality that would make it possible for lots of other films to continue or be brought back as well.
So hoping for it is fine. Pining for its return - not so much.
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,649
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,649
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
Well, Fuji does have a history of bringing back films that they have discontinued, so I don't think it's out of the realm of possibility. That said, as per the article mentioned above, if they cannot find a way to reduce production while keeping the costs manageable, I doubt it'll happen. But I now have several years supply of Acros sitting in my fridge (no room in the freezer) so if they do bring it back I'll really have to start shooting more of it (or get a bigger freezer). It would be nice if they brought back both the 400 and 1600 films as well, but that's probably wishful thinking.
We still have Ilford!
 

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
11,969
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format
I bought so much Acros film that I won't be buying Ilford for a loooooong time.

And no reciprocity correction needed for a looooooooong time.
 

Ron789

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 17, 2014
Messages
354
Location
Haarlem, The
Format
Multi Format
We'd better get used to analog photography products being discontinued. Let's face it: it's a niche market and there are still too many players around with too many different products, competing on a very small market. We would be better off with, say, 2 or 3 manufacturers really committed to analog photography. Much better than the current state: too many manufacturers, too many products, as a result noone is making good business. Let's say: Ilford, Kodak and Adox (or Foma) survive, all the rest is history. Let's face it: with the products these 3 companies produce, every photographer in the world should be able to make great photo's!
 

B.S.Kumar

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2007
Messages
3,744
Location
Nara, Japan
Format
4x5 Format
We'd better get used to analog photography products being discontinued. Let's face it: it's a niche market and there are still too many players around with too many different products, competing on a very small market. We would be better off with, say, 2 or 3 manufacturers really committed to analog photography. Much better than the current state: too many manufacturers, too many products, as a result noone is making good business. Let's say: Ilford, Kodak and Adox (or Foma) survive, all the rest is history. Let's face it: with the products these 3 companies produce, every photographer in the world should be able to make great photo's!

Except that no other manufacturer has been able to replicate the reciprocity characteristics of Acros, which is what makes it special.
 

Lachlan Young

Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2005
Messages
4,943
Location
Glasgow
Format
Multi Format
I've said this before & I'll say it again: from the way that the defenders of Acros trumpet across the landscape, you'd think that no one made successful night-time/ long exposure images before it was introduced in the late 1990's...
 

RattyMouse

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
6,045
Location
Ann Arbor, Mi
Format
Multi Format
We'd better get used to analog photography products being discontinued. Let's face it: it's a niche market and there are still too many players around with too many different products, competing on a very small market. We would be better off with, say, 2 or 3 manufacturers really committed to analog photography. Much better than the current state: too many manufacturers, too many products, as a result noone is making good business. Let's say: Ilford, Kodak and Adox (or Foma) survive, all the rest is history. Let's face it: with the products these 3 companies produce, every photographer in the world should be able to make great photo's!

You live in a fantasy ignoring the reality that Kodak is today in very very serious financial trouble. Just last week Kodak floated the idea that they would sell off the most profitable part of their business in a last ditch effort to pay outstanding debt. The company is STILL not financially viable years after emerging from bankruptcy. The stock price has been declining 2-5% per day for weeks now. The rats are starting to bail from the ship. Kodak warrants have lost 95% of their value. Investors are that certain that the loans will not be repaid back.

If we are honest, it should have been Fujifilm that should have been the last man standing between the two film producers. Fujifilm is an exceptionally stable company, far stable than Kodak could ever dream of. Fujifilm at one point was committed to film. They aren't now, but they used to be. Fujifilm had it all at one point, ISO100 and 400 monochrome film. ISO160, 200, 400, 800, and 1600 color film AND two flavors of E6 film.

THAT is the company people should have rallied behind, not a dying company preparing to dismember itself. Sure, losing Portra would have sucked, but people would have moved on. They always do.

Well, we had our chance, but it was not to be.
 

B.S.Kumar

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2007
Messages
3,744
Location
Nara, Japan
Format
4x5 Format
I've said this before & I'll say it again: from the way that the defenders of Acros trumpet across the landscape, you'd think that no one made successful night-time/ long exposure images before it was introduced in the late 1990's...

Certainly. But when exposures of 120~1000 seconds with Acros need only a half-stop correction, it makes life much easier.
 

NJH

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2013
Messages
702
Location
Dorset
Format
Multi Format
What you say RM is not just 100% true but by far the biggest threat to the continuation of colour analog photography. I am surprised more people are not worried by this, I could go B&W only but I really don't want to. I would probably end up hauling a digicam again and that then just creates my own existential threat to analog all over again.
 
OP
OP

Ste_S

Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2017
Messages
396
Location
Birmingham, UK
Format
Multi Format
You live in a fantasy ignoring the reality that Kodak is today in very very serious financial trouble. Just last week Kodak floated the idea that they would sell off the most profitable part of their business in a last ditch effort to pay outstanding debt. The company is STILL not financially viable years after emerging from bankruptcy. The stock price has been declining 2-5% per day for weeks now. The rats are starting to bail from the ship. Kodak warrants have lost 95% of their value. Investors are that certain that the loans will not be repaid back.

If we are honest, it should have been Fujifilm that should have been the last man standing between the two film producers. Fujifilm is an exceptionally stable company, far stable than Kodak could ever dream of. Fujifilm at one point was committed to film. They aren't now, but they used to be. Fujifilm had it all at one point, ISO100 and 400 monochrome film. ISO160, 200, 400, 800, and 1600 color film AND two flavors of E6 film.

THAT is the company people should have rallied behind, not a dying company preparing to dismember itself. Sure, losing Portra would have sucked, but people would have moved on. They always do.

Well, we had our chance, but it was not to be.

Absolutely. If Fujifilm do pull out and Kodak is left as the sole supplier of C41 it leaves colour film photography on very shaky grounds.
Fuji had a much better film portfolio until the culls started happening. After using Natura 1600 at my wedding I'm missing it now it's gone.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom