Fuji superiaa 800

[flavio81]

I'm afraid that there is not any 1600 ISO colour film for 120

Which is really sad, because if I had 1600 colour/color film in 120, my RB67 could go to where no one has dared to go before... and beyond.

This thread got me thinking of Konica 3200 and Scotch Chrome 640T; remember those?

I posted, in the relevand Ferrania thread, for the revival of Scotch Chrome 640T. Some brave, noble souls supported me, but others thought there was no need for fast tungsten-balanced film nowadays. I digress.

Or Ektar 1000; what a grainy film it was.

I used its cousin, Royal Gold 1000. Yuck, blergh, argh, *puke*... S
Kodak Supra 800 was infinitely better.

 

[Athiril]

Which is really sad, because if I had 1600 colour/color film in 120, my RB67 could go to where no one has dared to go before... and beyond.



I posted, in the relevand Ferrania thread, for the revival of Scotch Chrome 640T. Some brave, noble souls supported me, but others thought there was no need for fast tungsten-balanced film nowadays. I digress.



I used its cousin, Royal Gold 1000. Yuck, blergh, argh, *puke*... S
Kodak Supra 800 was infinitely better.

I've actually got a number of rolls of Konica Centuria (neg) in 3200 in 120 around somewhere... haven't dared to use one.

 

[aphid]

For those of you who haven't yet noticed, B&H has this back in stock! $3.99 for a 24 exposure roll.

 

[bvy]

Good news! Thanks for following up. Since this thread was started, I picked up a 4 pack for fear of the worst, and I'm already halfway through it...

 

[cmacd123]

I recall shooting some High speed "Ektapress" film way back when. Made for some nice street shots, back when folks did not notice the camera as they figured that it was too dark to take pictures anyway. I think that was a 3200 film also, with slightly higher than normal contrast so the pictures would look good in a newspaper.