... Who knew that 2.25 x 3.5 inches would look so big.
You said "insert"....hahahahahaha
I borrowed a Fuji GSW690 III with the 65mm lens to see if this is something I would like. Who knew that 2.25 x 3.5 inches would look so big.
I shot a roll of FP4+ without a filter on the lens and it is right on and contrasty. (looks great done in xtol).
So, I guess I will be looking for one of these now.
Certainly *one* of my favourite cameras, but it's bloody noisy and a pita for shots over 1 second. Can't fault the lens or the flatness of the film.I have a Fuji GSW690 III. It's my favorite camera.
Who knew that 2.25 x 3.5 inches would look so big.
GSW680III severeal listed at Keh.com maybe this will get you there directly, if not do it the hard way:
Dead Link Removed
EdIT: that the GX 680 so may not be the same.
I get it now.
I am now on a search for the rarely seen GSW680III.
...
Why? The actual negative size from a GSW690III is 56 x 82mm anyway, if I still remember correctly. The true 6x8 format. But then, maybe you're after the 58 x 7?mm actual size from the GSW680III?
I've been looking at the fuji rangefinders a lot recently. 4x5" format doesn't suit me but 6x9, in theory, has the same aspect ratio as 35mm (1.5). I'm terribly fond of 35mm, so it's big medium-format brother sounds quite appealing. Does anyone have any experience using hot-shoe light meters on these cameras? I have a hand held meter but found it a bit cumbersome to use on the fly.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?