Hello everyone,
There is welcome news of new fuji (made in Japan) film in Japanese shelves, as shown in the following video :
However, this news is followed by many commentators saying that Fuji did not restart mass production of film, but instead are only selling film cut from old master rolls stored in huge freezers.
I reckon that this rumor is a long-standing one, but are there any truth to it ?
Personally, I wonder if the global demand of Instax and the lack of supply (apparently sufficient to force Fuji to increase its industrial capacity) would be an ideal culprit. If (and that's a big if) coating lines are shared between Instax and film, Fuji couldn't really handle both at the same time.
Furthermore, why would Fuji claim a lack of raw material to be the culprit if it was really freezer film ? Logistically speaking, a freezer roll would be available anytime, and there is no explanation as to why they stopped producing it for some time before supplying it again. The freezer film doesn't make sense in this context.
The only major arguments I see for this rumor is :
1. The discontinuation of Pro 400H (which was apparently popular), meaning that the freezer master rolls were depleted following this rumor ?
2. Apparent Japanese insiders that purport it is indeed freezer film (no real and definite proof)
3. Acros being made at Ilford and not Fuji (meaning that they don't have any remaining capacity for film
What do you think about this rumor ? Any definite proof ?
Thank you,
Gabriel
There is welcome news of new fuji (made in Japan) film in Japanese shelves, as shown in the following video :
However, this news is followed by many commentators saying that Fuji did not restart mass production of film, but instead are only selling film cut from old master rolls stored in huge freezers.
I reckon that this rumor is a long-standing one, but are there any truth to it ?
Personally, I wonder if the global demand of Instax and the lack of supply (apparently sufficient to force Fuji to increase its industrial capacity) would be an ideal culprit. If (and that's a big if) coating lines are shared between Instax and film, Fuji couldn't really handle both at the same time.
Furthermore, why would Fuji claim a lack of raw material to be the culprit if it was really freezer film ? Logistically speaking, a freezer roll would be available anytime, and there is no explanation as to why they stopped producing it for some time before supplying it again. The freezer film doesn't make sense in this context.
The only major arguments I see for this rumor is :
1. The discontinuation of Pro 400H (which was apparently popular), meaning that the freezer master rolls were depleted following this rumor ?
2. Apparent Japanese insiders that purport it is indeed freezer film (no real and definite proof)
3. Acros being made at Ilford and not Fuji (meaning that they don't have any remaining capacity for film
What do you think about this rumor ? Any definite proof ?
Thank you,
Gabriel