I think that the Agfa Vista film sold in the U.K Poundland shops for £1 is Fuji 200 but may be Fuji C200 and not Superia so is safe. Can anyone confirm my suspicions? Otherwise if it is Superia 200 then Agfa Vista as we know it will eventually disappear.
Not wishing to divert the thread but what is/are the essential difference(s) between C200 and Superia? Is it the famous 4th layer that you used to see advertised on Superia film?
Thanks
pentaxuser
I wonder if a material problem had something to do with Reala. That was a big loss and in the current portfolio it would nicely get along 400H. BTW 160NS had quite a funny regional distribution: None in the US, and Japan had 120, 220 (that's what surprised me) and sheets.Acros and 400H are the only Fuji films that I shoot anymore. I've moved away from their E6 films and they dropped Reala which was my go to C41 film.
Such a disappointment.
Agfa Vista is indeed Fuji C200 or vice - versa. If you look at the cassette felt lined slot where the film protrudes from there is a small typefaced number. This designates the type of film it contains. This number on Vista is the same as Fuji C200
The "so-called" fourth layer does produce a different colour palette. And it's not "so-called". It's real.
Thanks BMbikerider. Is there a difference in quality and is this the so-called 4th layer?
pentaxuser
What the Fuji?
Also, Fujicolor 100 is all but gone... but there's a "Fujicolor Industrial 100" in Japan.
Again, what the Fuji?
they aren't anymore...Surprised 800 and 1600 are around
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?