Photo Engineer
Subscriber
You know, if Kodak made such a light weight paper, you all would b**ch about it! 
PE

PE
You know, if Kodak made such a light weight paper, you all would b**ch about it!
PE
You know, if Kodak made such a light weight paper, you all would b**ch about it!
PE
It was 75 F, Develop, Stop, wash, Harden/Fix, wash, Bleach, wash, Fix, wash Stabilize (something like that). It took about 1.5 hours! I have boxes of them here, done up until it was discontinued in the 60s.
PE
Oh dear, the development step for this one was something like 12 minutes or maybe more!
I could find an old data sheet here somewhere, but reading it makes me dizzy to see how many hours I spent in the DR back then.
PE
Hpulley- Yeah, I think it's "that bad." I blew $300 on Type II paper and I sacrificed two boxes of 16x20 simply for the dark bag and box. I have no idea what Fuji was thinking and I question if they did any analog testing. I special ordered a roll of matte Super Type C from B+H and it arrived in a timely manner. It just took three hours on a Saturday to cut 10% of it down. I posted in another thread that Type II is good for two things: bird cage lining and causing analog color shooters to go digital (which I refuse to do until it's totally gone).
Larry, Colorado
So does that mean that i can print with this Super C in rolls and it will be the same as the old type C cut sheet form that is now discontinued? I'm trying to finish out an edition of prints that was printed on that before there is no paper left !! So glad I found this site... i'm not alone![]()
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |