Hi all,
For black and white I use mainly Ortho Plus and T-max 400. And FilmFerrania Orto 50 when I do reversal.
However, for landscapes I'd like something different - and for landscapes and cityscapes with distant objects I assume HR-50 is suitable (I've shot it as Scala 50). But as it doesn't exist in 120 I need something else. I'll probably try it either way, but I am wondering about peoples experiences with Acros ii. I am not sure if I have misunderstood this or not - but this is a film that despite being less sensitive to red it is also less sensitive to blue/uv-light - making it ideal for 'horizon'-photography as it should cut through haze? It might not be as efficient in this as HR-50 but still pretty good at it?
If this is the case - how would you compare this film and its look to other films? And any particular developer(s) that it should be developed in?
Cheers
Peter
For black and white I use mainly Ortho Plus and T-max 400. And FilmFerrania Orto 50 when I do reversal.
However, for landscapes I'd like something different - and for landscapes and cityscapes with distant objects I assume HR-50 is suitable (I've shot it as Scala 50). But as it doesn't exist in 120 I need something else. I'll probably try it either way, but I am wondering about peoples experiences with Acros ii. I am not sure if I have misunderstood this or not - but this is a film that despite being less sensitive to red it is also less sensitive to blue/uv-light - making it ideal for 'horizon'-photography as it should cut through haze? It might not be as efficient in this as HR-50 but still pretty good at it?
If this is the case - how would you compare this film and its look to other films? And any particular developer(s) that it should be developed in?
Cheers
Peter
