Fuji Acros II or Adox HR-50

A seascape

A
A seascape

  • 2
  • 2
  • 88
Wall of Tissue

A
Wall of Tissue

  • 6
  • 0
  • 149

Forum statistics

Threads
200,731
Messages
2,813,064
Members
100,356
Latest member
Silas
Recent bookmarks
0

pkr1979

Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2019
Messages
528
Location
Oslo
Format
Multi Format
Hi all,

For black and white I use mainly Ortho Plus and T-max 400. And FilmFerrania Orto 50 when I do reversal.

However, for landscapes I'd like something different - and for landscapes and cityscapes with distant objects I assume HR-50 is suitable (I've shot it as Scala 50). But as it doesn't exist in 120 I need something else. I'll probably try it either way, but I am wondering about peoples experiences with Acros ii. I am not sure if I have misunderstood this or not - but this is a film that despite being less sensitive to red it is also less sensitive to blue/uv-light - making it ideal for 'horizon'-photography as it should cut through haze? It might not be as efficient in this as HR-50 but still pretty good at it?

If this is the case - how would you compare this film and its look to other films? And any particular developer(s) that it should be developed in?

Cheers
Peter
 

blee1996

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
1,375
Location
SF Bay Area, California
Format
Multi Format
When using same developers (Adox FX-39 II), I feel the HR-50 has higher contrast than Acros II. Thus Acros II might be better fit for high dynamic range scenes (e.g. sunrise, sunset).

In addition, Acros II has really good reciprocity characteristics for long exposures that are sometimes required for landscape.

I do like HR-50, but Acros II is a bit more flexible for my landscape use.
 
OP
OP

pkr1979

Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2019
Messages
528
Location
Oslo
Format
Multi Format
When using same developers (Adox FX-39 II), I feel the HR-50 has higher contrast than Acros II. Thus Acros II might be better fit for high dynamic range scenes (e.g. sunrise, sunset).

In addition, Acros II has really good reciprocity characteristics for long exposures that are sometimes required for landscape.

I do like HR-50, but Acros II is a bit more flexible for my landscape use.

@blee1996 - did you ever notice if the spectral sensitivity of Acros II cuts through haze like, or similar to, HR-50?
 
Joined
Nov 3, 2024
Messages
304
Location
Vic/QLD Australia rota
Format
Multi Format
My freezer has just 4 (precious) rolls of long-ago expired ACROS II. I use it for 6x6 pinhole photography for simple landscape subjects that suit it. The defining feature of ACROS II is an almost creamy, dream-like appearance of the tonal range — far removed from the blunt edge of e.g. Delta 100 and others. No filters used with the pinhole camera.
 

Attachments

  • Gellibrand River at Lion Headland_GONP.jpg
    Gellibrand River at Lion Headland_GONP.jpg
    240 KB · Views: 0
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom