Fuji 6x9 Rangefinder

Joined
Mar 18, 2005
Messages
4,942
Location
Monroe, WA, USA
Format
Multi Format

PM (err... Conversation message) sent, Roger. I don't want to continue sidetracking Parker's original thread topic.



Ken
 

Soeren

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2004
Messages
2,675
Location
Naestved, DK
Format
Multi Format
Hey don't cut the rest of us out now That's some awesome software youve got there
 

amellice

Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
424
Location
Snohomish, WA
Format
Medium Format
nice, looks pretty
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2005
Messages
4,942
Location
Monroe, WA, USA
Format
Multi Format

RattyMouse

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
6,045
Location
Ann Arbor, Mi
Format
Multi Format

What negative comments? Cost aside (and it's a big difference), the GF670 and GF670W are worlds better than the old Fuji rangefinders. Very modern, almost luxurious cameras compared to the spartan ones being talked about in this thread. The new camera's rangefinder alone are shocking with its huge patch and very bright glass. Yes, they are electronic but so are most other cameras.
 

mgb74

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 24, 2005
Messages
4,774
Location
MN and MA US
Format
Multi Format

The negative comments I've read are all about reliability, not performance. It's all anecdotal, so feel free to contradict me. But (there was a url link here which no longer exists) is just one example. Of course, mechanical cameras have issue too, but electronics add a layer of complexity and vulnerability (as well as functionality) above that.

And it seems electronics tend to fail regardless of usage. So I can't say "well, I've gotten 1,000 rolls of usage out of this camera". Someone who puts a 1,000 rolls through in 2-3 years might have a different view.

So my concern about the newer versions is whether they repairable. Are replacement electronic parts available and, if so, for how long? I don't believe Fuji has an enviable record for long-term support of their cameras. BTW, in US, manufacturers for most goods must have spare parts available only during the life of the warranty. I don't know about other geographies.

It's a risk vs. reward decision; which varies by individual.
 

macfred

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 6, 2014
Messages
3,839
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
FUJI's GF670 series are very desirable cameras - I would like to have one …
But they are outrageously expensive …
So I will shoot my GW670iii - and if it's broken (and can't be fixed for a reasonable price), I'll go for another one …
 
OP
OP
Joined
Jan 16, 2010
Messages
1,685
Location
Atlanta, GA
Format
Medium Format
Oh my, just got my new GW690III from KEH. I am smitten. After carrying around an RZ and a Hassy 553 ELX, this thing feels like a feather. It's really not heavy at all.

Thanks for all the feedback. I can't wait to get productive with this thing.
 

CropDusterMan

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2014
Messages
711
Location
Southern Cal
Format
35mm RF
Oh my, just got my new GW690III from KEH. I am smitten. After carrying around an RZ and a Hassy 553 ELX, this thing feels like a feather. It's really not heavy at all.

Thanks for all the feedback. I can't wait to get productive with this thing.

Awesome man! Glad you are happy.
 

Theo Sulphate

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
6,489
Location
Gig Harbor
Format
Multi Format
These were designed for pros who photographed groups of tourists at sites in Japan. They have a rubber / plastic covering, but have a metal shell. They should last a long time without issues.

Fuji recommended servicing the shutter after 5000 actuations (counter reads 500 or rolls over to 0).

My GW690III is at 46.

The manual can be found online.
 

CropDusterMan

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2014
Messages
711
Location
Southern Cal
Format
35mm RF
There are a ton of these on Ebay out of Japan...I always loved the format for un-cropped double
page spreads.
 

craigclu

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 8, 2002
Messages
1,303
Location
Rice Lake, Wisconsin
Format
Multi Format
I've had various Fuji RF's over the years and settled on keeping one... The slightly odd GSW680III. They're easily found, even though they were originally intended for the Japanese market and not seen much in the US. Merits to me are that common print sizes for me (8X10 and 11X14) crops the edges of the negative anyway. I love that I have 9 frames per roll and they fit standard 3 strip negative pages nicely (sounds petty, I know!). There is an edgy contrast in the optics that can cause some printing issues for me if not compensated for a bit in contrasty situations.
 
OP
OP
Joined
Jan 16, 2010
Messages
1,685
Location
Atlanta, GA
Format
Medium Format
I love that I have 9 frames per roll and they fit standard 3 strip negative pages nicely (sounds petty, I know!).

That's actually one of the things that drives me nuts about the 6x7, that 10th frame that has to be housed in an entirely new page. I usually end up cutting into twos so one frame doesn't get lonely and wander off.
 

BetterSense

Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2008
Messages
3,151
Location
North Caroli
Format
35mm
I have been around and around this search for the ideal travel MF myself. I have a GW690 but I find that I waste the edges of the negative. Just can't get used to the aspect ratio. I think I would prefer a camera of similar morphology but 6x7 or even 6x6 more. Thus the GF670 is appealing, but I hate batteries and it doesn't give me a good feeling as to durability.

Although it is not super heavy the fixed lens makes the 6x9 it bulky. I think if I could be content with 1 lens, my RB67 wouldn't be any harder to tote and has interchangeable backs. Maybe this is what leads people to the P67 or Mamiya 6/7, don't want to pony up the money for either just to try out.

I also tried out a 6x9 view camera which was lighter and easier to pack than any MF I tried excepf folders, but I found the tripod requirement and setup time killed spontaneity. Might as well pack a tachihara and have a bigger gg.

You know I'm strongly considering going 35mm-only. With an OM1 kit I could pack every lens, and still save weight and size, and not strictly need a tripod. Cameras like to N70s are so light they weigh less than many 50mm lenses. I could pack Delta 100 and PanF and the image quality would be fine for most prints. Not to mention i could pack 4x more exposures and worry less about airport xrays and light leaks. I just hate printing 35mm negatives after seeing for much better MF is.
 
Last edited:

craigclu

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 8, 2002
Messages
1,303
Location
Rice Lake, Wisconsin
Format
Multi Format
I got into MF with Rolleiflex and Mamiya TLR's and got accustomed to waist level finders (I'm old and this was many years ago). I'm surprised how compact some SLR's are with the WL finder instead of the prism attached, but it's certainly not for everybody. I've played with this a bit lately and it makes a big difference. I'm still an RF guy at heart and that's what I reach for when I know I'll be trecking a bit. I've got a Mamiya 7 and it's proven quite rugged and reliable for many years. They feel a little "plasticky/body covering by Mattel" but are actually quite durable and the optics are about as good as it gets, leaving your own skill level to blame for failure (one danger of good glass).
 
OP
OP
Joined
Jan 16, 2010
Messages
1,685
Location
Atlanta, GA
Format
Medium Format
So, is there an eyepiece that's supposed to go on this thing? I've put a few rolls through and I seem to be having trouble getting the focus spots aligned, they never quite match up. Most of my frames look a bit soft through a loupe, even where I tried to hyperfocal.

Manual says "viewfinder eyepiece." Does that have glass in it or is it just a rubber cup? Mine doesn't have it, whatever it is.

 

Prest_400

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2009
Messages
1,434
Location
Sweden
Format
Med. Format RF
Yes, it is a Nikon F round diopter eyecup. However, optically it has no effect supposedly if it's the default without any diopter correction. I recall going around ebay while on my search for one of the Fujis and many missed the piece.
May it have misaligned RF? Mine does not seem to go until infinity but it is accurate otherwise! Intrestingly, there are very few reports & complaints around the web about misalignment of the RF.
 

Prest_400

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2009
Messages
1,434
Location
Sweden
Format
Med. Format RF
Dead Link Removed Maybe if I get a brighter view I can focus a bit more accurately.

I recall there was someone inquiring that he bought one (from China) and did not fit. There was a mention of two different thread sizes. For the GW's, I have found with a couple of searches:
19mm diameter x 0.75 - Nikon FM/FE/F2/F3 (non-HP)

I forgot about eyesight problems, where a diopter comes in handy. I am short sighted but use the RF with my glasses on anyways... However, the relief of the RF/VF on these cameras is not very good for glasswearers and in my case I barely see the corners.
 

gone

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2009
Messages
5,504
Location
gone
Format
Medium Format
I think the only negative would be the size. A 6x9 folder is one thing, the Fuji is all together something else. I was amazed when mine came out of the box. In the end, it was just too big. The film requires quite a bit of muscle to pull past the pressure plate onto the next frame too, but I don't know if that is a negative. Just a feature.
 

CropDusterMan

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2014
Messages
711
Location
Southern Cal
Format
35mm RF


Are you actually serious? Effort in advancing to the next frame? C'mon man!
 

Theo Sulphate

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
6,489
Location
Gig Harbor
Format
Multi Format
Leica M6 has best winding feel of any camera I own; better than M3 even. Seems to wind to next frame by mental power alone.
 

Huss

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
9,058
Location
Hermosa Beach, CA
Format
Multi Format
The film requires quite a bit of muscle to pull past the pressure plate onto the next frame too, but I don't know if that is a negative. Just a feature.

Strange. Mine doesn't, unless you just mean it is a little heavier than winding a 35mm camera.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…