Fuji 135 f/4.5 vs EL-Nikkor 135 f/5.6

Tyndall Bruce

A
Tyndall Bruce

  • 0
  • 0
  • 25
TEXTURES

A
TEXTURES

  • 4
  • 0
  • 51
Small Craft Club

A
Small Craft Club

  • 2
  • 0
  • 49
RED FILTER

A
RED FILTER

  • 1
  • 0
  • 41
The Small Craft Club

A
The Small Craft Club

  • 3
  • 0
  • 47

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,903
Messages
2,782,781
Members
99,742
Latest member
stephenswood
Recent bookmarks
0

RoBBo

Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2007
Messages
255
Location
Chicago, IL
Format
Multi Format
I don't really care about the extra speed from the Fuji since they're both enlarger lenses and will be used in printing, and I can't imagine why I'd have it wide open ever.
More so the quality differences between the two.
Since I can get ahold of the Nikkor with a Beseler board for $95 or the Fuji for $10 (And have to get the board separately, another $20)
Is there a major quality difference?
I've used the Nikkor so I know its on the level of what I want, just really curious as if there's something wrong about the Fuji.
 

firecracker

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2005
Messages
1,950
Location
Japan
Format
35mm
I don't really care about the extra speed from the Fuji since they're both enlarger lenses and will be used in printing, and I can't imagine why I'd have it wide open ever.
More so the quality differences between the two.
Since I can get ahold of the Nikkor with a Beseler board for $95 or the Fuji for $10 (And have to get the board separately, another $20)
Is there a major quality difference?
I've used the Nikkor so I know its on the level of what I want, just really curious as if there's something wrong about the Fuji.

What label does the Fuji lens have? If it's a Fujinon "EX" lens, it's the latest version of their lens, multi-coated, and damn good. I have a 90mm and a 50mm from this series for my enlarger, so I know the quality only to some extent.

If it's Fujinon EP or ES, it means older with probably mono-coating, but still pretty good. If it's a Fujinar lens, just avoid it.

Meanwhile, El Nikkor is what it is. If you like it, go for it. Or you might want to get both since the prices are pretty low.

In general, based on my own experience, to me Fuji lenses tends to produce less contrasty and less grainy than Nikkor lenses. The way I desscribe is that the images produced with the Fuji lenses are rather quiet-toned, on the other hand, the ones with the Nikkor lenses, a bit wilder-toned. But you can't really see the difference if you are enlarging small, like 8x10" and maybe some lenses don't have these characterisitcs at all.

But then you're getting a used enlarger lens, it also depends on the previous use of the lens.
 

computar

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2006
Messages
3
Format
Medium Format
For medium format enlarger lenses, all the Fujinon with 4,5 aperture was ES series (4 elements). Top series was EX (latest and better) and EP (older than EX) with 6 elements construction and 5,6 aperture.
Avoid ES series, in this case prefer the EL nikkor 5,6/135.
With a Peak or Micromega focuser, the grain rendition with the Nikkor is top sharp.
 
Joined
Oct 25, 2004
Messages
1,057
Location
Westport, MA
Format
Large Format
If the fuji is ex, grab that in a heartbeat. It's the sharpest enlarging lens i've ever used, at least mine is. Really nice lens.
Otherwise go with the nikkor. I have an older 6 element nikkor, 90mm. It's okay but nothing to write home about. Atleast mine is..
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom