• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Frugal Photographer Bluefire HR Developer Experimentation

Babel

H
Babel

  • 1
  • 0
  • 19

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
201,875
Messages
2,831,594
Members
100,996
Latest member
sonora
Recent bookmarks
0

August

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 17, 2013
Messages
13
Location
Eau Claire,
Format
Multi Format
Those in the Flickr Film Photography Project group have seen these but I figured I'd share the result at the moment that I've experienced using this type of developer.

I picked up a 1 liter kit from Frugal Photographer website www.frugalphotographer.com/catBluefire.htm (scroll down to the powder mixture if interested in purchasing) and decided to try it out on some of my stash of high contrast film.

This developer is designed to work with high contrast films such as microfilms and their house brand Bluefire Police HR film. I tried a search on Flickr before buying and couldn't find that many examples of people using the developer (however I've found a fair amount from those using the Bluefire Police film with great success).

It's a two part powder that is mixed into a single bottle to make a stock solution (I mixed mine with distilled water, but can be mixed with standard tap water too). When you get ready to develop your film you mix 15mL of stock solution per 250mL of water, thus making a 1:16 one-use working solution.

They give two different times for developing, which I thought was a bit confusing. They first list 12 minutes @ 68 F ( 20 C) of continuous agitation (maybe for a JOBO?) with no description on how it will affect contrast.

The second time was 14 to 16 minutes @ 68 F ( 20 C) with light agitation for the first minute, five seconds of light agitation for the following minutes. Explaining this is to achieve tonal contrast.

The first film I tried it on was Fuji Super HR 35mm microfilm. This is non-perforated film I ran through a Canon EOS 10s because of it's lack of sprockets and the 10s ability to still use this kind of film. The I metered these at 25 ISO/ASA and shot them in late afternoon during a cloudy fall day (no sun reference).

I processed at the minimum time of 14 minutes opting for the light agitation instructions. Water stop-bath and Clayton Odorless Fixer used for all rolls unless otherwise noted. All the rolls were developed @ 68 degrees Fahrenheit:

15247723378_036b2427f7_b.jpg 15433973552_2f43db6541_b.jpg 15247725008_5c8fb8c295_b.jpg

After getting these results, I tried two other high contrast films on a cloudless, sunny day. I wanted to see how well this developer dealt with high contrast lighting situations. The two films I settled on were Eastman Kodak SO-331 Title/Credit film and Kodak Kodalith Type III both in 35mm. Due to the lighting, I bumped development to 15 minutes to see if I could achieve shadow detail with such high contrast film. Camera used was a Pentax K1000 using a Sears 50mm f/2.

Eastman SO-331 shot @ 25 ISO:
15360005799_a6c1379b77_b.jpg 15547466002_3dd295d12c_b.jpg 15543947141_87fca52ab5_b.jpg

What was not a surprise was how the Kodalith acted when shooting sunlit subjects. Super contrasty, next to no shadow detail.
Kodak Kodalith Type III shot @ 6 ISO:
14925955934_2391b9b0eb_b.jpg 14926524403_f85b75e860_b.jpg 14925955554_f6952db2d5_b.jpg

However, when you stick this film in the shadows using this developer, it can be quite lovely:
15544021471_e8350ede0e_b.jpg 14926521663_fc28be839b_b.jpg

Next, I went back to microfilm front and shot some 35mm Fuji HRII sprocketless microfilm in my Canon EOS 10s. Lens used was a Helios 44-2 on an M42 adapter. Went back to the 14 minute development time with this film.

Fuji HRII shot @ 25 ISO:
15721670026_3b5cd05cab_b.jpg 15743465441_f26030220f_b.jpg 15125982513_ddd879e41a_b.jpg

Though I have noticed I will probably have to do a pre-soak as I've noticed a few frames have some uneven development:

15560551020_ae58852ac5_b.jpg

I have a few more high contrast film stocks on hand, and while I realize there are plenty of other developers and dilutions out there that could give me the same results, I really wanted to give this a go and see what I would get. I'll update this post with more results when I can.
 

gone

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jun 14, 2009
Messages
5,504
Location
gone
Format
Medium Format
Excellent work! I like nearly all of these, especially #10 and 11, although that mailbox in #3 is great too. Thank you very much. I am bookmarking this and hope to hear more.
 

Ektagraphic

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Feb 3, 2009
Messages
2,928
Location
Massachusetts
Format
Medium Format
Very interesting! Thank you for sharing! I have been meaning to try the Bluefire Police film and developer, but haven't gotten around to it. You results look quite promising to me, great work!
 

Alan Johnson

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 16, 2004
Messages
3,381
I think this developer may be a version of H&W Control, possibly with the phenidone replaced by dimezone-S.
I have used Tom Hoskinson's variation of this:
(there was a url link here which no longer exists)
It even works with the very high contrast Adox CMS 20 microfilm.
 

jbrubaker

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 5, 2008
Messages
139
Format
35mm
I have used this developer with Agfa Copex microfilm for Minox (8x11mm). I was pleased with the results, but the Frugal site was out of stock on the developer for a long time, so I never tried again. I can't standardize on a product that isn't readily available. ---john.
 
OP
OP
August

August

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 17, 2013
Messages
13
Location
Eau Claire,
Format
Multi Format
Had a chance to throw in some Eastman 5369 HCP Title/Credit film. This was metered and shot at 20 ISO, however being it's winter time, the light changed faster than I realized.

Photos were shot with a Nikkormat FTn with the 50mm f/1.8 E-Series lens. The film was given a 5 minute filtered water pre-soak. Processed in Bluefire HR (1:16) for 15 minutes (to improve shadow detail) at 68 F (20 C).

Scanned with an Epson V500, no adjustments made in post.

attachment.php
attachment.php


May not be the best examples but this developer does really smooth out high contrast films. That being said, I gave this same developer a try with some Ilford Pan F+ and those negatives came out quite flat and lifeless. So it would seem it's only good for Copy/Title film and Ortho/litho films.

Soon I'll be testing Kodak 2462 and Svema Blue Sensitive bw, which are both slow films which have an ISO range from 1.5 down to .75 respectively.

I've also noticed when using this developer with high contrast films, it tends to work well in the shadows or on thick, overcast days where there is no sun reference, which I would assume would translate to even, soft lighting in a studio setting.
 

Attachments

  • 16338121889_c797c1cc83_b.jpg
    16338121889_c797c1cc83_b.jpg
    197.4 KB · Views: 198
  • 16336935000_4f216be84a_b.jpg
    16336935000_4f216be84a_b.jpg
    424.6 KB · Views: 218
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom