Front Mounting - an alternative approach

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,354
Messages
2,790,183
Members
99,879
Latest member
jcastrillo
Recent bookmarks
0

Dr Croubie

Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
1,986
Location
rAdelaide
Format
Multi Format
Hi all,
I made this a while ago, but I finally had the light-box set up the other day so I thought I'd take some photos to share, of how I went about front-mounting my Apo-Ronar to a shutter and lensboard. I thought some around here might find it interesting to try for themselves.

Firstly, SKGrimes of course do front-mounting, but from what I understand all they do is machine an adapter that screws into your shutter, and your lens screws into that.
Not a bad approach for smaller lenses, but a) it's expensive, b) especially so considering the postage from Aus to USA for me, c) most importantly, I would be really nervous about hanging 1kg worth of lens onto a screw-mount-adapter into a shutter, that's a whole lot of torque around the various interfaces and I'd be afraid it would just snap off one day.

So this is my method which I used on my 465mm f/9 Apo Ronar. Cheap (<$10 besides cost of lens/shutter/lensboard), and easy, but it requires a few things. Most importantly is the original flange-ring (or get one made), a lensboard (Toyo #1 for me), and a shutter (a Polaroid MP4 for me) you want to use. Next are some little standoffs that I normally use for PCBs, these were M4x25mm.
Mark out the lensboard with the position of the 6x screw holes on the flange. Drill out and screw the standoffs on:
attachment.php

(the photo shows the shutter already mounted, but I'd leave this until after you've finished drilling etc. I've put a screwdriver through a shutter before and it ain't pretty).
These screws are brass because I didn't have any black ones floating around, but black is probably better inside for less potential reflections.

Then screw the flange onto the other end of the standoffs:
attachment.php
attachment.php


Then, to keep everything light-tight between the lens and shutter, I put in some regular $2-from-ebay-China step-up rings, 40-52mm and 52-62mm. 62mm is wider than the rear-element so it won't touch the glass, only its retaining ring.They aren't held in by anything other than sandwiching from the lens screwing in, but I suppose you could glue them onto the shutter if you don't mind it being permanent:
attachment.php


Also very important, to further protect the lens and stop the step-rings scratching it, plus to make sure it's perfectly light-tight, I put a piece of round felt between the step-up rings and the lens before screwing it in. Coincidentally, such a piece exactly the right size came to me mounted on the Polaroid MP4 shutter-lensboard I used, or you can cut your own:
attachment.php


Then, just screw in the lens. Be careful not to let the felt get moved out of place, or just glue it to the step-rings (which I haven't). I found it's easier to do this with the lens on the bottom and lensboard above:
attachment.php


And done:
attachment.php


As a bonus, I have a 600mm f/9 Apo-Tessar which uses the same size mounting ring as the Apo-Ronar. So now I can easily change lenses by unscrewing, and leaving the lensboard on the camera:
attachment.php


As for coverage, I haven't really calculated it. It's got more than enough for 4x5, which is what my Toyo is. This will suffer the same less-coverage problem as all other front-mountings (as illustrated by Grimes in the link above). However, for this particular combination it's probably going to have more coverage than if I'd used a simple screw-screw adapter, as that would have to be really hefty/thick to take the weight, so I reckon this approach gets the lens closer to the shutter than otherwise possible (ergo, wider coverage). I could have possibly used 20mm or 22mm-long standoffs to get even closer for more coverage, but I didn't have any handy and it would make it harder to change shutter speeds on the lens.

Next up I plan to do the same thing on a Cambo board for my 8x10, I'm waiting for my #3-sized shutter now (I'm hoping that will fit in between the standoffs, or I'll have to do something else fancier).
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2217brs.JPG
    IMG_2217brs.JPG
    704.8 KB · Views: 514
  • IMG_2218brs.JPG
    IMG_2218brs.JPG
    695.4 KB · Views: 209
  • IMG_2219brs.JPG
    IMG_2219brs.JPG
    563.2 KB · Views: 198
  • IMG_2220brs.JPG
    IMG_2220brs.JPG
    653.1 KB · Views: 196
  • IMG_2221brs.JPG
    IMG_2221brs.JPG
    660.7 KB · Views: 200
  • IMG_2222brs.JPG
    IMG_2222brs.JPG
    579.6 KB · Views: 195
  • IMG_2223brs.JPG
    IMG_2223brs.JPG
    607.6 KB · Views: 208
  • IMG_2224brs.JPG
    IMG_2224brs.JPG
    634.5 KB · Views: 195

Dan Fromm

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Messages
6,839
Format
Multi Format
Cute.

So you'll know, Adam Dau of SKGrimes told me that a Copal #1 will support a 610/9 Apo Nikkor (1,45 kg) in a cup-shaped adapter. And it does.

Your trick is very similar to one Adam did for me to hold a 900/10 Apo Saphir (heavy) in front of a #1. Worked, but a bad idea. The diaphragm had no effect until the lens was stopped down until around f/32. At that point the exit pupil was smaller than the shutter's maximum opening. The lens is now attached directly to the board and there's a Compound #5 in front of it.
 
OP
OP
Dr Croubie

Dr Croubie

Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
1,986
Location
rAdelaide
Format
Multi Format
Cute isn't the word I've normally heard with this thing mounted, usually it's, "OMG WTF IS THAT THING, A ROCKET LAUNCHER?!?!?!".
But then, I've heard people say similar things even with a 90mm and WA bellows, so I'll take 'cute' over that any day.
attachment.php

(normally I use two normal bellows but I couldn't find one so grabbed my bag bellows, and no, I couldn't be bothered unscrewing the shade when I added the third standard). Sorry for the crappy pic, that Samyang 35/1.4 is a bit soft at f/2 and it's a bit dark in here.

I just checked it out, focussed at infinity on 4x5, no tilts/shifts.
Looking through the clipped-corners of the GG, I can see all of the aperture-blades at just under f/32, ie no mechanical vignetting narrower than that.
With the GG off, looking straight at the lens directly centered, I can see all of the blades at f/16.
So it's effectively got a max aperture of f/16, and the same vignetting as the bare lens after f/32.
I don't think I've ever taken a 4x5 at wider than f/16, so that's good enough for me.

Once I do this on a #3 I'll see how well it goes, but it should be even better than this #1.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2225brs.JPG
    IMG_2225brs.JPG
    605.2 KB · Views: 161

Dan Fromm

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Messages
6,839
Format
Multi Format
Croubie, understand that I shoot medium format (2x3, moved up to 6x12 last year). Here's another approach to shooting a long lens (480/9 Apo Nikkor, cup-shaped adapter by SKGrimes) on my little 2x3 Graphics: http://1drv.ms/1vwOKxF http://1drv.ms/1vwP3IE

I haven't quite retired the Graphics, but have cobbled together a hybrid Cambo (4x5 rear standard, 2x3 front standard, Cambo tapered pleated bellows and home made tapered bag bellows) for 6x12. Recently got a 6x9 roll holder to fit the 4x5 standard, with an eye to transporting less gear. Pix sooner or later
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom