Greetings. I did take possession of the E-5 enlarger today. After looking into available parts and estimating the plausibility of fabricating some unavailable parts, I thought that this might be a manageable project. And it turns out that there may be some additional parts buried in a very confused mangle of estate goods, but they probably won't be revealed on any relevant timescale.
Happily, the 101mm Wollensack Raptar f4.5 in the enlarger is matched to one of the two focusing rails: the labels on the lens plate and on one of the rails match (rail label pictured below). Of course the lens could have been replaced on the lens plate, but I'll ignore that possibility for now. The second rail has a different label, but does specify "lens F 964", which is not present.
The instruction manual (recovered today) specifies either Wollensack Raptar or Kodak Ektanon lenses of specific focal lengths, to be matched with specific lens cones. I have read elsewhere that each rail is matched to a specific lens (not just to a certain focal length, make and model). The labeling on the Wollensack 101mm and matching rail here seem to confirm that. So I wonder if I could ever use the second rail in the enlarger, lacking the lens that it was matched to ...? My impression now is that the lens - cone - rail are a matched set, required to make autofocus work properly.
The lamphouse is in good shape (photos below), except for peeling paint. According to manual, the lamphouse is intended to function as an integrating sphere, which places some (not insuperable) constraints on candidate replacement paint if I decide to try to duplicate the OEM lamphouse. I'll have to come up with a replacement ballast as well. Given that Circline-style bulbs are still manufactured, I would think getting a suitable ballast would not be too difficult. I'm still up in the air about fitting the lamphouse with LEDS rather than duplicating the original parts.
I attached a photo of the focus cam, which ic-racer asked about earlier. Looks like the 'standard' cam, rather than the 'A-2' cam... I deduce this by referring to the Technical Service Manual that Kino referred me to. Presumably the A-2 cam goes on the A-2 enlarger?
So, at this moment the biggest holes are negative carriers and lens cones. I see some cones are available, but the carriers are a question. I have emails out to Glennview and KHB, no replies yet. Optimistically, those holes could fill in any day now. Otherwise, I'll have a shot at fabricating the parts.
I'm not done asking for help yet, but I thank all you who have helped me to get this project going.
cheers
Tom
