In addition the use of Potassium Iodide as the restrainer will give much Bluer tones, however this might be at the expense of archival permanence, I'm just reading some research by Grant Haist.
But this does lead to the possibility of a bleach / redevelopment process for "Blue" tones using a KI based re-halogenating bleach & re-developer.
Ian
That sounds extremely interesting, please post your results!plus a variable Purple-black, Blue-black, Blue, Violet formula which I'll test in the next few days.
That sounds extremely interesting, please post your results!
Hmm, that's very interesting! My uneducated guess would have been that thiourea would be very hard to restrain.However Additive-X which is Thiourea (Thiocarbamide) is problematic, the idea is attributed to S.H. Wratten (1910). The Thiourea causes fogging so the developer needs to be well restrained.
So 10ml of 1% Thiourea in 400ml working solution of developer resulted in almost instant fogging. Cutting the amount of Thiourea drastically adding 10ml of a 0.005% solution and 100ml of 1% Benzotriazole as the anti-foggant gave the results above. The colour shift was caused by the Thiourea, I tried first with no Bezotriazole) which I added to cut the slight base fog.
Well, my toothpaste contains a third of that amount, just for comparison. But of course, getting the fluoride would be hard for mere hobbyists like me...Another chemical suggested by I.G. Farbenindustrie (Agfa) to produce cold blue tones is Sodium Fluoride, at 0.4% in the developer formula, but as fluoride is classed as a Poison it's probably got to be ruled out.
Hmm, quinine HCl would even be available from chemist's shops over here...More usually organic compounds have been used, mostly proprietary, starting with quinine hydrochloride, quinoline is said to be amongst the best but has a strong unpleasant smell. Agfa and Ilford Patents show their searches for alternatives.
Peoples -
Do not allow thiourea to come in contact with your skin. See:
http://www.jtbaker.com/msds/englishhtml/t3107.htm
Health Rating: 2 - Moderate (Poison)
Flammability Rating: 1 - Slight
Reactivity Rating: 1 - Slight
Contact Rating: 3 - Severe (Life)
Lab Protective Equip: GOGGLES & SHIELD; LAB COAT & APRON; VENT HOOD; PROPER GLOVES
"Investigated as a tumorigen, mutagen, reproductive effector."
It also says it is an anticipated carcinogen.
You can get cold tones similar to Ian's example using Ansco 130 with benzotriazole substituted for the bromide.
Also, benzotriazole is not known or suspected as a carcinogen, it has a Health Rating of 1, and a Contact Rating of 2. Much safer than thiourea...
Hmm, that's very interesting! My uneducated guess would have been that thiourea would be very hard to restrain.
I suppose such a formulation would be a one-shot developer and sulfide toner (certainly convenient!), or is something entirely different going on here?
It is available from a company called Fototechnik Suvatlar via Wolfgang Moersch (see http://www.moersch-photochemie.de/content/rohchemie, sorry, only in german). Just in case someone is looking for it...Agfa Ansco 130 isn't really a substitute to get Blue/Black tones, and anyway Glycin isn't available in the UK and EU and hasn't been for a number of years, so it need[s another approach.
Hmm, I have seen warm tone papers get colder (violet-brownish) in sulfide, and assumed that was what had happened there. Very interesting!Something different is definitely going on, you'd expect Thiourea to give warmer tones but it's doing just the opposite.
Kirk, most chemicals used in Photography are hazardous if used incorrectly, many far more so than Thiourea.
Agfa Ansco 130 isn't really a substitute to get Blue/Black tones,
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?