Formulating cold tone paper developers

Paris

A
Paris

  • 1
  • 0
  • 101
Seeing right through you

Seeing right through you

  • 3
  • 1
  • 141
I'll drink to that

D
I'll drink to that

  • 0
  • 0
  • 112
Touch

D
Touch

  • 1
  • 2
  • 109
Pride 2025

A
Pride 2025

  • 1
  • 1
  • 137

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,381
Messages
2,773,911
Members
99,602
Latest member
RockvilleMMF
Recent bookmarks
0

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,253
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
In addition the use of Potassium Iodide as the restrainer will give much Bluer tones, however this might be at the expense of archival permanence, I'm just reading some research by Grant Haist.

But this does lead to the possibility of a bleach / redevelopment process for "Blue" tones using a KI based re-halogenating bleach & re-developer.

Ian
 

Peter Schrager

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 19, 2004
Messages
4,127
Location
fairfield co
Format
Large Format
cold tones

it just seems from my own personal research that the paper you use is far more suseptible to tones than the developer is usually capable of...try slavich with something like zone VI and add benzo...freezing cold!! most of the formulas worked well for the older papers but have little or no effect on modern ones...
Best, Peter
 
OP
OP

Tom Kershaw

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 5, 2004
Messages
4,974
Location
Norfolk, United Kingdom
Format
Multi Format
Earlier today I mixed up my proposed formula (Experimental Cold Tone Paper Developer V.2.0) which works well at 1+3 dilution, and produces strong blacks with Kentmere Bromide, good contrast and tonality etc. However, I would not classify the tones as blue-black. I then added 1g Benzotriazole to the working solution which seemed counter productive, and resulted in odd changes in tonality and contrast.

The ID-62 developer with reduced Potassium Bromide and the addition of Benzotriazole in 20, + 10, + 20, + 30, + 20ml increments produced similar results to my altered D-72. The tone was slightly warmer before the addition of Benzotriazole and resulted in similar problems to E.C.T.P.D v2 at higher concentrations of Benzotriazole.
 
OP
OP

Tom Kershaw

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 5, 2004
Messages
4,974
Location
Norfolk, United Kingdom
Format
Multi Format
In addition the use of Potassium Iodide as the restrainer will give much Bluer tones, however this might be at the expense of archival permanence, I'm just reading some research by Grant Haist.

But this does lead to the possibility of a bleach / redevelopment process for "Blue" tones using a KI based re-halogenating bleach & re-developer.

Ian

Ian,

In what sort of quantities would you suggest adding Potassium iodide in a single bath development scenario?

If using a bleach and redeveloping technique does the Potassium iodide still introduce potential stability concerns?

Tom.
 
OP
OP

Tom Kershaw

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 5, 2004
Messages
4,974
Location
Norfolk, United Kingdom
Format
Multi Format

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,253
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
Tom, Ilford and Agfa (and presumably Kodak in liquid Dektol) use Potassium Carbonate often with Sodium or Potassium Hydroxide in place of Sodium Carbonate in liquid developers. A typical Ilford example (Patent reference developer) uses 38.44g Potassium Carbonate plus 2.12g of Sodium Hydroxide per litre instead of 50g of Sodium Carbonate, while a similar Agfa formula uses 15 g Potassium Carbonate and 4g Potassium Hydroxide. It's all to do with the relative insolubility of Sodium Carbonate being the limiting factor of the potential concentration of a commercial developer, and also cost savings.

Adding Potassium salts instead of Sodium will give very slightly warmer tones.

If you add Potassium Iodide then Kodak's research was into 1-8gm's per litre of working solution, but the KI has an impact on fixer capacity as Silver Iodide is formed which is relatively insoluble. Kodak were using it in activators with developer incorporated papers to control image colour and induce blue B&W tones.

Ian
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,253
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
I'm looking into that at the moment, but I'll be in a better position next week when I can access my reference books.

A major problem is that Ilford & Agfa used proprietary organic agents to control the cold/blue tone, even if we knew what they are it might be difficult to get the small quantities required.

As soon as I find something I'll post it here.

Ian
 

Anscojohn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Messages
2,704
Format
Medium Format
Freestyle offers a liquid concentrate cold-tone paper developer, stating dimezone-s as one of the constituents.
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,253
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
Ilford now use Dimezone-S in some of their liquid PQ developers instead of Phenidone so it shouldn't make any significant difference to the image colour/tone.

Ian
 
OP
OP

Tom Kershaw

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 5, 2004
Messages
4,974
Location
Norfolk, United Kingdom
Format
Multi Format
Ian,

What do you think the effect would be of using say 8g Benzotriazole in the stock solution, translating into 2g per litre of working solution? I suspect the paper would need to be given extra exposure under the enlarger.

Tom.

EDIT: Actually, I've tested at 1.5g Benzotriazole per litre of working solution already...
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,253
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
There are too many variables Tom, different papers will behave in different ways, you'd need to try it. I have to admit that most of my research in the past regarding image colour has been predominantly into warm-tone developers and toners.

Ian
 

nworth

Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
2,228
Location
Los Alamos,
Format
Multi Format
First, let me state that I don't really know what I'm doing. But the principles laid out here seemed so clear: for cold tones keep the pH high (within reason), avoid phenolic developing agents, use plenty of restrainer, but substitute potassium iodide and benzotriazole for potassium bromide. It couldn't be that hard. After searching a good many published formulas, I came up with the following and mixed it up using incantations that have proved effective in previous such adventures:

Sodium sulfite (anh) 15 g
Trisodium phosphate 40 g
Phenidone 200 mg
Ascorbic acid 10 g
Potassium iodide (1% soln) 5 ml
Benzotriazole (1% soln) 10 ml

pH 10.8

(Sodium carbonatre and sodium hydroxide could probably be substituted for the TSP to get this pH. The TSP I used was a commercial cleaning material, and its hydration is uncertain.)

I tried it out with Ilford MGIV RC. That paper isn't known for its tonal response with different developers, but oh well. I compared the results with development in D-72. The results were somewhat cooler, although not a lot. This developer obviously needs tuning, since the midtones were decidedly worse than those with D-72. In any case, I was encouraged. I tried the following:

Metol 3 g
Sodium sulfite (anh) 15 g
Trisodium phosphate 40 g
Ascorbic acid 10 g
Potassium iodide (1% soln.) 10 ml
Benzotriazole (1% soln.) 20 ml

The results were much improved. The tone shifted very significantly toward the blue, contrast was good and reasonable, and the gradation was a lot more like D-72. The principles seem to work, at least from these limited tests. My curiosity was satisfied, so I quit here. But the developers are not really finished. They need fine tuning. Unfortunately, that's hard work.
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,253
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
Now found references to 3 suggested adjuvants all of which should be better at producing Blue tones than Benztriazole, one is a halide :D, plus a variable Purple-black, Blue-black, Blue, Violet formula which I'll test in the next few days. Much work was done in this field in the 20's & 30's.

Ian
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,253
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
Additive-X

That sounds extremely interesting, please post your results!

I did a crude test last night with some Ilford Warmtone FB and the difference in colour was quite distinct.

additive-X.jpg


The left side was developed in the PQ version of ID-20 (Forte FD-203 which is ID-62 with no benzotriazole), the right with the same developer with Additive-X.

However Additive-X which is Thiourea (Thiocarbamide) is problematic, the idea is attributed to S.H. Wratten (1910). The Thiourea causes fogging so the developer needs to be well restrained.

So 10ml of 1% Thiourea in 400ml working solution of developer resulted in almost instant fogging. Cutting the amount of Thiourea drastically adding 10ml of a 0.005% solution and 100ml of 1% Benzotriazole as the anti-foggant gave the results above. The colour shift was caused by the Thiourea, I tried first with no Bezotriazole) which I added to cut the slight base fog.

This initial crude test shows there's definitely some potential in adding Thiourea, but more work needs to be done.

Another chemical suggested by I.G. Farbenindustrie (Agfa) to produce cold blue tones is Sodium Fluoride, at 0.4% in the developer formula, but as fluoride is classed as a Poison it's probably got to be ruled out.

More usually organic compounds have been used, mostly proprietary, starting with quinine hydrochloride, quinoline is said to be amongst the best but has a strong unpleasant smell. Agfa and Ilford Patents show their searches for alternatives.

Ian
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Kirk Keyes

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2004
Messages
3,234
Location
Portland, OR
Format
4x5 Format
Peoples -

Do not allow thiourea to come in contact with your skin. See:
http://www.jtbaker.com/msds/englishhtml/t3107.htm

Health Rating: 2 - Moderate (Poison)
Flammability Rating: 1 - Slight
Reactivity Rating: 1 - Slight
Contact Rating: 3 - Severe (Life)
Lab Protective Equip: GOGGLES & SHIELD; LAB COAT & APRON; VENT HOOD; PROPER GLOVES

"Investigated as a tumorigen, mutagen, reproductive effector."

It also says it is an anticipated carcinogen.

You can get cold tones similar to Ian's example using Ansco 130 with benzotriazole substituted for the bromide.
Also, benzotriazole is not known or suspected as a carcinogen, it has a Health Rating of 1, and a Contact Rating of 2. Much safer than thiourea...
 

thmm

Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2008
Messages
32
Format
35mm
However Additive-X which is Thiourea (Thiocarbamide) is problematic, the idea is attributed to S.H. Wratten (1910). The Thiourea causes fogging so the developer needs to be well restrained.

So 10ml of 1% Thiourea in 400ml working solution of developer resulted in almost instant fogging. Cutting the amount of Thiourea drastically adding 10ml of a 0.005% solution and 100ml of 1% Benzotriazole as the anti-foggant gave the results above. The colour shift was caused by the Thiourea, I tried first with no Bezotriazole) which I added to cut the slight base fog.
Hmm, that's very interesting! My uneducated guess would have been that thiourea would be very hard to restrain.
I suppose such a formulation would be a one-shot developer and sulfide toner (certainly convenient!), or is something entirely different going on here?

Another chemical suggested by I.G. Farbenindustrie (Agfa) to produce cold blue tones is Sodium Fluoride, at 0.4% in the developer formula, but as fluoride is classed as a Poison it's probably got to be ruled out.
Well, my toothpaste contains a third of that amount, just for comparison. But of course, getting the fluoride would be hard for mere hobbyists like me...

More usually organic compounds have been used, mostly proprietary, starting with quinine hydrochloride, quinoline is said to be amongst the best but has a strong unpleasant smell. Agfa and Ilford Patents show their searches for alternatives.
Hmm, quinine HCl would even be available from chemist's shops over here...

Very interesting, thanks for posting your research!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,253
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
Peoples -

Do not allow thiourea to come in contact with your skin. See:
http://www.jtbaker.com/msds/englishhtml/t3107.htm

Health Rating: 2 - Moderate (Poison)
Flammability Rating: 1 - Slight
Reactivity Rating: 1 - Slight
Contact Rating: 3 - Severe (Life)
Lab Protective Equip: GOGGLES & SHIELD; LAB COAT & APRON; VENT HOOD; PROPER GLOVES

"Investigated as a tumorigen, mutagen, reproductive effector."

It also says it is an anticipated carcinogen.

You can get cold tones similar to Ian's example using Ansco 130 with benzotriazole substituted for the bromide.
Also, benzotriazole is not known or suspected as a carcinogen, it has a Health Rating of 1, and a Contact Rating of 2. Much safer than thiourea...

Kirk, most chemicals used in Photography are hazardous if used incorrectly, many far more so than Thiourea. The level of Thiourea used is extremely low and so not a potential problem, a great many photographers will be using Thiourea at far higher concentration in Sepia toners.

Agfa Ansco 130 isn't really a substitute to get Blue/Black tones, and anyway Glycin isn't available in the UK and EU and hasn't been for a number of years, so it needs another approach.

Hmm, that's very interesting! My uneducated guess would have been that thiourea would be very hard to restrain.
I suppose such a formulation would be a one-shot developer and sulfide toner (certainly convenient!), or is something entirely different going on here?

Something different is definitely going on, you'd expect Thiourea to give warmer tones but it's doing just the opposite.

Ian
 

thmm

Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2008
Messages
32
Format
35mm
Agfa Ansco 130 isn't really a substitute to get Blue/Black tones, and anyway Glycin isn't available in the UK and EU and hasn't been for a number of years, so it need[s another approach.
It is available from a company called Fototechnik Suvatlar via Wolfgang Moersch (see http://www.moersch-photochemie.de/content/rohchemie, sorry, only in german). Just in case someone is looking for it...

Something different is definitely going on, you'd expect Thiourea to give warmer tones but it's doing just the opposite.
Hmm, I have seen warm tone papers get colder (violet-brownish) in sulfide, and assumed that was what had happened there. Very interesting!
 

Kirk Keyes

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2004
Messages
3,234
Location
Portland, OR
Format
4x5 Format
Kirk, most chemicals used in Photography are hazardous if used incorrectly, many far more so than Thiourea.

Something is "hazardous" regardless of how it's used. It's an intrinsic property of the substance. The amout of risk or exposure varies based on the practice of the individual using it.

I just want to point out that thiourea is a suspected carcinogen (unlike the vast majority of photochemicals typically used in the home darkroom) and people should be aware of it.

That said, I've used thiourea toner myself, so I'm not saying it's something to never use, I'm just saying it's something that people need to have some understanding of the potential hazards when using thiourea.
 

Kirk Keyes

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2004
Messages
3,234
Location
Portland, OR
Format
4x5 Format
Agfa Ansco 130 isn't really a substitute to get Blue/Black tones,

The benzotriazole variation of Ansco 130 that I mentioned above certainly does change the tone of Ilford Warmtone FB paper, and much as you show in your scans above. No thiourea needed to make a nearly neutral paper considering how warm it is to start with.

Could you take some color densitometer readings of some paper in your formula at Dmax and compare them to the same paper in regular developer so we can get an idea of the color shift?
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom