Fomaspeed Variant 311 RC Glossy vs Ilford MGRC Deluxe Glossy

gone

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2009
Messages
5,504
Location
gone
Format
Medium Format
I was in the darkroom for 7 hrs last night, and made two comparison prints between these RC papers. This isn't a detailed comparison, just my first impressions w/ the Foma paper. I've been using the Ilford paper for a while, and this is a tough contest as the MGRC is the best RC paper I've used.

First, Foma's ...."rich halftone scale from a shining white tone to a deep black one" is only half true. I got decent blacks, but the white is anything but shining white. It's a sorta light gray color actually. This paper also needed around twice as much exposure compared to the Ilford paper, at least on these prints. Initially I tried to make a straight comparison by using the same exposure w/ the Foma paper as the Ilford. That resulted in a highly underexposed Foma print. So on these two shots, I did the test strips like always, and kinda tried to make the 2 prints look the same. The Foma paper is also flimsier than the Ilford.

I like the Foma paper, but it probably needs to be used w/ the right negatives. These two may have not been right for it.



 
Last edited:

radiant

Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2019
Messages
2,135
Location
Europe
Format
Hybrid
Here is my tests with Stouffer wedge (311, MGRC and Harman direct positive):



I haven't seen any problems with whites on 311. Maybe your paper got fogged or the exposure wasn't correct? Looking at the picture it seems to be a bit overexposed / a bit lower contrast than MGRC.

On high contrast (blue) there isn't that much difference in terms of characteristic curve. But on low contrast (green) the Ilford seems to be much linear on shadows.

I've actually made really decent prints with 311 - altough my everyday paper is MGRC.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,127
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format

brbo

Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2011
Messages
2,126
Location
EU
Format
Multi Format
My 311 comes out white whites. No safelight, complete darkness from start to finish.
 
OP
OP

gone

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2009
Messages
5,504
Location
gone
Format
Medium Format
I read the stats on the Foma paper that came w/ it before printing. There's a real low wattage red filter safelight WITH a sheet of Ruby red lith over that. Never fogged a paper yet. The safelight is a long way from the print area, and everything is quite dim. If it were fogging, why isn't the Ilford fogged? No, it's not fogged, not by me anyway. Besides, I always have my back to the safelight when I take the paper out, and after it's in my "easel", the safelight is automatically turned off by the timer.

I forgot, the developer was Legacypro Liquid Paper Developer. This was my first time for me w/ that developer and it worked fine.

Note: when I said the Foma whites were more gray like, that's w/ a Foma print next to the Ilford print. I actually like the paper, just need to find suitable negs for it. This happened before when I looked at the whites of Adox MCC 110 prints compared to other papers I'd been using. The Adox was what it was, a paper I sorely miss.
 
Last edited:

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,127
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
momus said:
If it were fogging, why isn't the Ilford fogged?
Click to expand...
There are significant differences in the spectral sensitivity of some darkroom papers from some different manufacturers. You cannot rely on tests made with another company's papers.
Here is the excerpt from the Ilford data-sheet:


And here are the excerpts from the Foma data-sheet:




625 nm is a fair bit longer than where the Ilford sensitivity goes down to zero.
 
OP
OP

gone

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2009
Messages
5,504
Location
gone
Format
Medium Format
There is one other possibility that I just thought of. This paper sat outside my front door pretty much all day in Az heat. The FedEx people never knock, they just put stuff down and run back to the truck. I never even knew it was there until I went to lock up that evening.

I mentioned that I followed Foma's instructions for this paper regarding safelight usage before printing (indirect low wattage safelight w/ orange or red filter, keep the light far away from the print area, etc, etc). Nothing here gets printed in total darkness if that's required, and the fact sheet made no mention of any of this, just use the safelight that I did.
 
Last edited:

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,127
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Certainly a possibility.
After all, how fogged would you be if you were left outside your front door pretty much all day in Az heat.?
Try one print in as much complete darkness as you can manage. If it comes out better, you will know more.
 
OP
OP

gone

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2009
Messages
5,504
Location
gone
Format
Medium Format
I would be dead out there! But OK, just for grins, I'll print it again next time I do a print run, and I'll do it in total darkness. Hate to do that though. Reminds me too much of my attempts at color processing, which was not for me. That's why they have labs: to develop and print my 2 rolls of color film that are usually shot in a year.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,127
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
If it works in darkness, and you really like the result, you can consider replacing your safelight with a true orthographic safelight. It will be somewhat dim, but at least you will be able to use it with both the Foma and the Ilford paper.
 
OP
OP

gone

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2009
Messages
5,504
Location
gone
Format
Medium Format
As Alice once said, things get curiouser and curiouser. This is the back of the paper, where there is no emulsion. Big difference in the two papers. I wonder why? Fogging the emulsion wouldn't do this. The darkish brown one is the Foma.

 

lantau

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2016
Messages
826
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
If I may ask, how is the gloss of the Foma, compared to Ilford? I have a box of 8x10 Foma 311 for making contact sheets. The surface is very dull. Perhaps like what you get when two smooth surfaces against each other for some time.

I'm wondering if it is only the one box, or a feature of 311.
 

Frank53

Member
Joined
May 18, 2013
Messages
660
Location
Reuver, Netherlands
Format
Multi Format
Have you taken into consideration, that with another paper, not only exposure time changes, but also grade?
Regards,
Frank
 
OP
OP

gone

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2009
Messages
5,504
Location
gone
Format
Medium Format
OK, I decided to just make test strips because I can use the Fomaspeed paper just as it is. After the neg was focused, all lights were turned off and the Fomaspeed strips were cut and developed in total darkness. The safelight should be ok for the Fomaspeed because it wasn't on this time. The top strip is the Ilford paper from a previous printing session. These shots were totally desaturated to avoid any tint issues.

One test strip was cut from a paper in the middle of the pack, and the other from a paper that was on the bottom. All I can do now is buy a fresh pack of papers w/ my next Freestyle order and try this again in the dark, and then once again w/ my current safelight. Now that I've looked at these papers a while, I agree, they're probably fogged. Maybe it did get fried sitting out in 105 degree sun all day outside.

 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…