DeletedAcct1
Member
"there are none so deaf as those who will not hear"Another developer will not give another result. This particular developer is, in general, one of the best matches for this film. I've been using it for years. It is of course part of the recommended matching developers by Foma itself, as shown in the Foma product catalogue here https://www.foma.cz/en/catalogue_bw_photo_materials_and_developing_information - page 5
![]()
Here's an example scan from an old batch of Foma 200 in 120, developed in the exactly the same product (Fomadon R09 1:50), stopped in Fomacitro as normal, fixed in Fomafix as normal. Tap water, no prewash, no special rinse, no sacrifices to the Gods.
![]()
100% magnification details
![]()
![]()
![]()
Really quite acceptable for me. Again: no prewash, no distilled water, same developer, same stop, same fixer products used for the faulty batch in post #221. The above is how a 'good' batch of Fomapan 200 looks like using the same workflow I use for all my film - no special concessions.
Out of interest - here's how Foma 200 in 35mm looks when developed not only in the same developer + dilution (Fomadon R09 1:50), but the same bottle of Fomadon R09 I used for the faulty Fomapan batch in post #221:
![]()
![]()
![]()
And with this, I've completely lost interest in this topic. All the best in your Foma 200 journey!
Money, time and will are all yours. Good luck.