Foma Retropan 320 - First test

[DcAnalogue]

Hi to all!

recently I bought a couple rolls of Foma Retropan 320. I loaded the first on a Voigtlander Vito B, rated it @ 250 and developed with Adox FX39 (1+9). Yes, I know it isn't fine grain developer but didn't worked bad with Delta 400. Next time I'll test the second roll with Ars-Imago Fd or Ilford DD-X (as I haven't other developers for now).

Grain was very evident and not always pleasant, expecially on highlights zones. Tones were good.

See (and read) about the whole test on my Film Blog.

 

[Peter Schrager]

Thanks for the info..keep us updated....always interested in new materials
best,peter

 

[sagai]

Not bad indeed

 

[DcAnalogue]

Thanks for the info..keep us updated....always interested in new materials
best,peter

Thanks for your interest. I share all my film experiences her and on my Blog..... as I learned much from others sharing....

 

[DcAnalogue]

Not bad indeed
View attachment 155730
View attachment 155731
View attachment 155733

Yep... not bad...... How did you developed it...?

 

[Nokton48]

Makiflex Retro


[url=https://flic.kr/p/BsftVW] Makiflex Retro 320 - 3 by Nokton48, on Flickr320 - 2[/URL] by Nokton48, on Flickr

 

[sagai]

Yep... not bad...... How did you developed it...?

So ...
My register is saying:
The BMW thing is Foma Retro Special developer
The wood was Microphen stock solution.
The C330f was Foma Retro Special too.

 

[DcAnalogue]

So ...
My register is saying:
The BMW thing is Foma Retro Special developer
The wood was Microphen stock solution.
The C330f was Foma Retro Special too.

Thanks for the info!

 

[Peter Schrager]

Now you got me going here sagai...those pix look nothing like any of the others...rich nice and creamy. . Are you really liking it??

 

[sagai]

Peter, we are here retaining the pig blood, mix with rice and spices, then stuff it to the pig its own rectum, than we put it to the oven and eat all of it with a big smile on our face.
My liking could differ from others


I suspect that this film needs to be developed in a contrast working developer, otherwise for longer development times the contrast could develop excessively and unexpectedly (unless we thoroughly test is that I surely will not do).
This Retro Special developer get to the top of the contrast curve in 5-6 minutes contrary with all the rest of the developers, that I suspect is to be behind the difference in "creaminess".
I have received some hints from Foma for using Retro Special for other films these are the followings:
-Retropan 320 (EI 320) ……………. 4 – 5 min
-Fomapan 100 (EI 100) ……………. 5 min
-Fomapan 200 (EI 200) ……………. 4 min
-Fomapan 400 (EI 400) ……………. 6 – 7 min

 

[Nokton48]

I can now get the Foma Retro Developer from Freestyle here:

http://www.freestylephoto.biz/57430-Foma-Retro-Special-Powder-Film-Developer-to-make-1L

I've been told HC110 can give very similar results. We will see.
Below, my stock of 9x12cm Retropan. 300 sheets.

002 by Nokton48, on Flickr

 

[sagai]

I can now get the Foma Retro Developer from Freestyle here:

Below, my stock of 9x12cm Retropan. 300 sheets.

002 by Nokton48, on Flickr

I think it should be really nice on other than 135 format.
Interested in your experience!