Fogging redeveloper or separate fogging agent and redeveloper?

Carved bench

A
Carved bench

  • 0
  • 3
  • 33
Anthrotype-5th:6:25.jpg

A
Anthrotype-5th:6:25.jpg

  • 6
  • 3
  • 99
Spain

A
Spain

  • 2
  • 0
  • 86
Nothing

A
Nothing

  • 2
  • 3
  • 165

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,053
Messages
2,768,953
Members
99,547
Latest member
edithofpolperro
Recent bookmarks
0

Hans Borjes

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2006
Messages
119
Location
Berlin
Format
Medium Format
I am currently trying to adjust the intensity of a fogging agent in b/w reversal processing. For single use I have recalculated the amounts from a popular recipe and 520mg stannous chloride in 260ml water plus 2,9ml potassium hydroxide (45%) is still creating a precipitate.

Additionally it turns out that this is still too much fogging.

I wonder whether it would be possible to do the same that Kodak did in the Tmax reversal kit and add the fogging component directly into the second developer?

In my case this would mean to add a few (hundred) milligrams of stannous chloride into the Rodinal 1:25 working strength solution of 260ml.

Has someone an idea whether that would work, or would this destroy the fogging or developing capability?
 

htmlguru4242

Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2005
Messages
1,012
Location
Eastern NC, USA
Format
Multi Format
Not sure, but the question here also may be "why use a fogging agent". Doing this with light is SOO much better, as it requires no additional chemistry and is believed by many to create superior, more archival results.
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,210
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
As I understand it, you want the fogging agent to fully fog the film -- any adjustments are made in the first developer; develop more there, and you'll lighten the final image because the silver developed in the first dev is removed before the reversal and second dev. Essentially, all the processes in B&W reversal after the first dev are carried to completion.

So, if your transparencies are too dark (which I infer from your statement that the fogging agent is too strong) you either need to first develop more, expose more, or put more halide solvent in your first developer (to clear highlights).
 
OP
OP
Hans Borjes

Hans Borjes

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2006
Messages
119
Location
Berlin
Format
Medium Format
htmlguru4242 said:
Not sure, but the question here also may be "why use a fogging agent".
I regret that this in not my question.
htmlguru4242 said:
Doing this with light ... is believed by many to create ... more archival results.
Another user with professional background in motion pictures has once posted in this forum that there is no evidence for that.

I am not sure what I am supposed to 'believe'.
 
OP
OP
Hans Borjes

Hans Borjes

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2006
Messages
119
Location
Berlin
Format
Medium Format
Donald Qualls said:
As I understand it, you want the fogging agent to fully fog the film ...
Yes and no. I am not using halide solvent additives in the first developer which is fairly strong already (Rodinal 1:13, i.e. 20ml concentrate, 10 minutes at 24°C and 75 rpm).

From earlier experiments I know that I need just the right amount of light for a perfect slide, currently trying to create that chemically.

Back to my original question: can stannous chloride be added to the second developer?
 
OP
OP
Hans Borjes

Hans Borjes

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2006
Messages
119
Location
Berlin
Format
Medium Format
Hans Borjes said:
I wonder whether it would be possible to do the same that Kodak did in the Tmax reversal kit and add the fogging component directly into the second developer?

In my case this would mean to add a few (hundred) milligrams of stannous chloride into the Rodinal 1:25 working strength solution of 260ml.
Cool, it works. Although 210mg stannous chloride have created some precipitate that I have eliminated by filtration. So it seems to be just a matter of parameter optimisation, i.e. amount of stannous chloride needed and adjustment of the second development time.
 

Gerald Koch

Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2004
Messages
1,662
Format
Multi Format
Donald is right, in reversal processing the second development should go to completion. Any adjustment in the density of the slide should be done by changes in the exposure index of the film and by the amount of development in the first developer.
 
  • Deleted member 2924
  • Deleted
OP
OP
Hans Borjes

Hans Borjes

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2006
Messages
119
Location
Berlin
Format
Medium Format
Hans Borjes said:
Cool, it works. Although 210mg stannous chloride have created some precipitate that I have eliminated by filtration. So it seems to be just a matter of parameter optimisation, i.e. amount of stannous chloride needed and adjustment of the second development time.
It works even better when 210mg stannous chloride is solved in 240ml water first and 20ml Rodinal is poured slowly into the solution. No precipitate, no filtration necessary, a simple workable reversal developer, just a tiny digiscale needed.
 
OP
OP
Hans Borjes

Hans Borjes

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2006
Messages
119
Location
Berlin
Format
Medium Format
Update: I have tried to reduce the amount of stannous chloride in my second developer. 20mg is far too less and has only a marginal fogging effect. 50mg is almost strong enough. Best uniformity of second development seems to be at 70mg and 4minutes.

So I will stick to the approach of a reversing second developer because it offers the best workflow with the Jobo machine.

However, the slides are still slightly yellowish. I will follow your suggestion and try adding a halide solvent to the first developer and see what it does in this respect.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom