Doremus Scudder
Member
That's more or less how I would I have described the test. My problem with it is that it assumes the fixer being tested is capable of fully clearing the film. If it's exhausted, then that first drop you put on the film will not fully clear the film, and the test tells you how long the fixer is capable of doing the most it can do. Rereading what you have, I don't think we disagree. You do call it a "test for clearing time" which is accurate. I think some people mistakenly think of it as a test for fixer efficacy.
bvy,
You're inventing a problem that doesn't exist.
The clip-test assumes you have established a base line (clearing time) using fresh (i.e., known-to-be-good-and-work) fixer that is mixed in one of the recommended dilutions for your application. Otherwise, it's just a shot in the dark.
Fresh fixer is a) freshly-mixed from dry chemicals that are known to be fresh or b) freshly-mixed from liquid concentrate that is known to be fresh.
A drop of fixer is placed on the film and left to do its work for 30-60 seconds. Then the entire strip of film is immersed in the fixer and agitated; simultaneously, you start timing. All this under good lighting so you can see what's going on. When the film is clear enough that you can no longer see the area under the drop as separate from the rest of the film, you have "cleared" the film and you should note the time (this is your "clearing time"). Be aware that it is the time it takes to clear the film that is important here. Exhausted fixer or fixer that has gone bad from age will still clear the film; just in a longer time.
When (or if) your fixer is exhausted (even partially), it will not (no way, no how) clear the film in the same time.
Now, how you want to apply your clearing time can be different. I like to fix my film for at least 3x the clearing time, especially if it is tabular-grain film (T-Max) since there are iodides in the film that take longer to fix than "conventional" films. Ilford and others say 2x. You can do the research and decide for yourself. In any case, I do a clip test with my partially-exhausted fixer before each batch and arrive at my minimum fixing time for that particular batch based on the (longer) clearing time in the used fixer.
In any case, when the clearing time for used (or unused old) fixer reaches 2x that in fresh fixer (your benchmark, remember?), the fixer should be discarded. It has been used too much or stored too long. Mix new fix. That's all there is to it.
If you have fixer that you suspect of not being able to fully clear the film, then you need to compare it to your benchmark clearing time. (If you haven't established that, then you should...)
If you fix film using these guidelines and add a bit of time for a safety factor (fixing slightly longer does no damage to film), you can be sure that your film is as fixed as it is likely to get after you have finished. The base will not be completely transparent; there is base fog and emulsion there. There may also be dyes that have not washed out completely. Modern films have stubborn sensitizing dyes in them that leave pink or blue casts to the base. This latter, however, has nothing to do with fixing; a slight color cast to the film will not affect printability or longevity.
Note that the above is for film. For prints a clip-test is less applicable, especially if two-bath fixing is used. Testing your workflow for residual silver (e.g., using the Kodak ST-1 test) is the best way. Using manufacturers' guides for throughput is the second best.
Best,
Doremus
Last edited:



