Whoa! Did you salvage the Altoids tin? Can't let a perfectly good pinhole camera body go to waste...
Thank you for kind comments! I didn't do anything special, but it is interesting how Lomography undersells their products by showing super grainy/foggy etc images. I honestly think they intentionally set the bar low so that if people screw up they are not disappointed!
I think it's fair to say that we - the APUG/Photrio types of film shooters - are the minority among film users.I think that their marketing team is not used to selling products to APUG/Photrio types.
Thank you for kind comments! I didn't do anything special, but it is interesting how Lomography undersells their products by showing super grainy/foggy etc images. I honestly think they intentionally set the bar low so that if people screw up they are not disappointed!
I tried Orwo TF12D (sound recording film) which I believe is the same as Fantome. In Rollei Low Contrast developer the contrast is quite ok and it ticks many boxes (emulsion color, being ortho) as a key suspect. And very cheap when in bulk (I paid around 1.5 USD per roll).
Eastman 5234 would be similar to Orwo DN21 or Lomo Babylon. I am a big fan of Eastman 2234/5324. 2234 just has a different base same emulsion. And right now I have a bulk roll of Orwo DN 21. They are both beautiful films to my eye. Also Orwo lists DN 21/ Lomo Babylon as their equivalent to Eastman 2234/5234.
Is Fantome 8 ortho?
Is Fantome 8 ortho? I an not quite clear on this in that I think some posts hint strongly that it is but it would help if this was clear.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?