hello apug forum!
a tiny introduction from my side.
i am a 37 year old artist living in paris and have been interested in working with photography since quite some years.
almost ten years ago i have been doing a little expo in vienna, working for the first time with the liquid emulsion by maco (rollei black magic/fixed grade).
the results were.. comme ci comme ca
not too bad i guess..
as it was an off-space, the crowd appreciated the "imperfections" of still lifes directly printed on the shabby walls.
coming back to working with this technique now again, i am aiming for somewhat higher standard, and here comes my question(s), for which i am hoping to find some answers here.
using again black magic (variable grade this time) i have to say that i am not impressed with the tonal range of the emulsion.
i am using a durst m800 enlarger and 6x7 cm negatives developed in rodinal (with a wonderful rendition of tones) and dont want to give up hope yet to find a solution.
i am already using tetenal centrabrom, sacrificing some dmax, and a grade 1.5 filter (should going even softer help? i doubt it)
is there any advice from people having used other commercial emulsions or will making the emulsion myself give better results?
am i too spoiled from looking at photo paper and have to accept that a comparable tonality is impossible to reach with liquid emulsions?
does it have to do with the fact that these emulsions are not panchromatically sensitized?
have had contact with a technician at maco, it was his advice to try the less contrasty centrabrom, and i have to say that it seems to have helped a bit. but i am still not satisfied. ;(
he said that these emulsion are rather "hard".. hmm.
i would be very happy to get some ideas/tips on how to continue my quest to do better.
thanks and hello to all lovers of the silver grain out there
chris
a tiny introduction from my side.
i am a 37 year old artist living in paris and have been interested in working with photography since quite some years.
almost ten years ago i have been doing a little expo in vienna, working for the first time with the liquid emulsion by maco (rollei black magic/fixed grade).
the results were.. comme ci comme ca
not too bad i guess..as it was an off-space, the crowd appreciated the "imperfections" of still lifes directly printed on the shabby walls.
coming back to working with this technique now again, i am aiming for somewhat higher standard, and here comes my question(s), for which i am hoping to find some answers here.
using again black magic (variable grade this time) i have to say that i am not impressed with the tonal range of the emulsion.
i am using a durst m800 enlarger and 6x7 cm negatives developed in rodinal (with a wonderful rendition of tones) and dont want to give up hope yet to find a solution.
i am already using tetenal centrabrom, sacrificing some dmax, and a grade 1.5 filter (should going even softer help? i doubt it)
is there any advice from people having used other commercial emulsions or will making the emulsion myself give better results?
am i too spoiled from looking at photo paper and have to accept that a comparable tonality is impossible to reach with liquid emulsions?
does it have to do with the fact that these emulsions are not panchromatically sensitized?
have had contact with a technician at maco, it was his advice to try the less contrasty centrabrom, and i have to say that it seems to have helped a bit. but i am still not satisfied. ;(
he said that these emulsion are rather "hard".. hmm.
i would be very happy to get some ideas/tips on how to continue my quest to do better.
thanks and hello to all lovers of the silver grain out there
chris

