first leica

Leaf in Creek

A
Leaf in Creek

  • 2
  • 0
  • 263
Untitled

Untitled

  • 2
  • 0
  • 295
Untitled

A
Untitled

  • 2
  • 0
  • 305
"I can see for miles"

A
"I can see for miles"

  • 2
  • 0
  • 476

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,938
Messages
2,799,132
Members
100,084
Latest member
calkev
Recent bookmarks
0

flavio81

Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2014
Messages
5,097
Location
Lima, Peru
Format
Medium Format
The entrance and exit pupils of the symmetrical lenses for RF cameras are about the same size - hence no distortion @ any ƒ/stop and focus distance.
With asymmetrical wides for SLR (or RF), the pupils are of different size - hence the distortion with variable form, tied to focus distance etc. etc.

In case some magazines in the 1960's said otherwise because their advertisers asked - it's a free world that runs on money. :wink:

No... I own the above lens (the retrofocus, SLR one) and it is indeed free from distortion and sharp to the edges, for all practical purposes and practical shooting distances. Not theory but actual, usable results.

The world has moved to SLR long, long ago. I understand there rangefinders can have their advantages, but "distortion free wide angles" are not a rangefinder-exclusivity anymore.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,500
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
The entrance and exit pupils of the symmetrical lenses for RF cameras are about the same size - hence no distortion @ any ƒ/stop and focus distance.
With asymmetrical wides for SLR (or RF), the pupils are of different size - hence the distortion with variable form, tied to focus distance etc. etc.

In case some magazines in the 1960's said otherwise because their advertisers asked - it's a free world that runs on money. :wink:

No... I own the above lens (the retrofocus, SLR one) and it is indeed free from distortion and sharp to the edges, for all practical purposes and practical shooting distances. Not theory but actual, usable results.

The world has moved to SLR long, long ago. I understand there rangefinders can have their advantages, but "distortion free wide angles" are not a rangefinder-exclusivity anymore.

The Hasselblad 903 SWC is rectilinearly correct and it is not a range finder nor nor an SLR, but it is a MF camera.
 

georg16nik

Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Messages
1,101
Format
Multi Format
The Hasselblad 903 SWC is rectilinearly correct and it is not a range finder nor nor an SLR, but it is a MF camera.

Biogon. Inspired from...
In 1946 the first patent for a new kind of symmetrical wide-angle lens was applied for by the Russian lens designer Michail Roossinov. It looked as if two retrofocus lenses had been combined with the rear elements together and thus had a symmetrical arrangement of positive refractive powers close to the aperture, surrounded at the front and back by strongly negative menisci.
As of 1951, Ludwig Bertele carried this idea further and designed the legendary Biogon on behalf of Zeiss...

by H. H. Nasse
Carl Zeiss AG
Camera Lens Division
Dezember 2011
 

Theo Sulphate

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
6,489
Location
Gig Harbor
Format
Multi Format

ColColt

Member
Joined
May 26, 2015
Messages
1,824
Location
TN
Format
Multi Format
There was a camera(s) that looked much like that but had a bellow. Which one was that? I saw a picture of Margaret Bourke-White with one, a rarity as she preferred larger format.
 

Ko.Fe.

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
3,209
Location
MiltON.ONtario
Format
Digital
After getting Leica M film camera I would not take any other RF, not just for free, but even if I paid to use it. Waste of my photography time.
 

bo eder

Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2010
Messages
52
Format
35mm
After getting Leica M film camera I would not take any other RF, not just for free, but even if I paid to use it. Waste of my photography time.

This sounds like a very satisfied Leica customer right here! Don't waste his time! :wink:
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,500
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
My "best photographs" are the ones that are on the undeveloped film and the ones that I never took.
 

ColColt

Member
Joined
May 26, 2015
Messages
1,824
Location
TN
Format
Multi Format
The shots I've missed could have been Pulitzer Prize winners but, I'll never know.:smile:
 
OP
OP

seanE

Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
172
Format
35mm
Do you guys have any experience with screw mount lenses? i see you can get nice focal lengths and F numbers quite cheaply on the ebay, and how important is sharpness? i know that sound dumb, but how much detail can say tri-x 400 resolve, id be planing on using a fast noisy film elusively.
 

darkosaric

Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
4,568
Location
Hamburg, DE
Format
Multi Format
Do you guys have any experience with screw mount lenses? i see you can get nice focal lengths and F numbers quite cheaply on the ebay, and how important is sharpness? i know that sound dumb, but how much detail can say tri-x 400 resolve, id be planing on using a fast noisy film elusively.

LTM Leicas are awesome, cheap old elmar 5cm f3,5 is a great lens. Look here:

(there was a url link here which no longer exists)
 

Ko.Fe.

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
3,209
Location
MiltON.ONtario
Format
Digital
Do you guys have any experience with screw mount lenses? i see you can get nice focal lengths and F numbers quite cheaply on the ebay, and how important is sharpness? i know that sound dumb, but how much detail can say tri-x 400 resolve, id be planing on using a fast noisy film elusively.

Where are four large groups for LTM lenses:

Old Leica, mostly 50mm, plus Summars 35 3.5 and Elmar 90 f4. All are pleasing, low contrast, classic Leitz rendering. Main and common problem - quality of glass. Doesn't coop with time.

FSU - mostly for 50mm, plus 35mm Jupiter 12 and 28mm Orion 15 for common used. In opposite to old Leitz glass those have clean and more less durable optics. But mechanically they aren't even close to old Leitz.
All are aluminum with very tiny screws to hold parts together. If you are handy FSU 50mm primes once collimated (shimmed) will give results surpassing old Leitz 50mm LTMs. Those are also most cheapest one in cost.

Old made in Japan LTM. Big selection. Good results. Might have similar problems with glass as old Leitz, but seems to be less in average.

Cosina made LTM lenses. Those are new, modern and plenty. Focal length easily to get are 50, 35 and wider with matching VFs. Next to issues free in handling, but some lenses might need thread lock to be applied after extensive use. Most of Cosina LTM glass is very contrasty. But kind of flat in terms of rendering.

All of these lenses will give enough sharpness on 8x10, if not larger prints. I have most of my experience with bw, color bring different aspects. LTM Cosina made will give most predictable and well saturated, correctly balanced results, because they are modern lenses.
 

Ko.Fe.

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
3,209
Location
MiltON.ONtario
Format
Digital
A Retina in the pocket beats my M4 left at home.

In the pocket? No doubt. For in the pocket I used to have XA, BTW.

But I'm not into the cameras for pockets for now.
If I'm on the walk I wear the camera. And nothing beats film M with tabbed Leica lens on it for fast fiddling.
By the time you'll set Retina, I'll be done and gone with M and using of only one hand :smile:
 
OP
OP

seanE

Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
172
Format
35mm
thanks guys, how do the preform on m mount cameras, are there good and bad adopters,
 

Ko.Fe.

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
3,209
Location
MiltON.ONtario
Format
Digital
Most will fit alright on M adapter. Some will have focus tab between RF windows on close focus distance. Some will not work with M adapters at all (I have seen only one so far).
I never used Leica, Cosina made M adapters, but cheap from e-bay. It works fine, but maybe this is why some of the old LTM lenses didn't. :smile:
LTM version of same lens usually have 1m or so for minimal focus distance. M version will let you get closer.
 
OP
OP

seanE

Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
172
Format
35mm
I'm after getting distracted by some leica m4/4-2/4-p. If you were to pick one leica for life under the 6/700 mark, What would it be? I read that the m4s can't be adjusted, And what they go out of wack you need a new part, but I've also read that the steel parts are sturdier, which last the longest after a CLA?
also whats with ''simplifying the range finder'' can i still nail focus with a f1.1 50mm?
 

Ko.Fe.

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
3,209
Location
MiltON.ONtario
Format
Digital
I'm after getting distracted by some leica m4/4-2/4-p. If you were to pick one leica for life under the 6/700 mark, What would it be? I read that the m4s can't be adjusted, And what they go out of wack you need a new part, but I've also read that the steel parts are sturdier, which last the longest after a CLA?
also whats with ''simplifying the range finder'' can i still nail focus with a f1.1 50mm?

Do not take serious this BS about steel parts. German are build differently from Canadian, different manufacturing methods to make it more cost effective with some slight modifications of materials which in real photography are irrelevant.
But all three cameras you have mentioned are very different. M4 is classic, as classic as it could be but without limitations of M2/M3. M4-2 is something special, it doesn't feel old as German M4,3,2, but it feels like simple and perfect tool if you like it in black. M4-P is more fancy one, very different from M4 and M4-2.
I have M4-2 and it is the camera I trust after it was taken to -28 +40 Celsius for hours, days and months. They are less expensive because many buying Leica with huge snobbery factor and limited photography skills.

Of course, 1.1 is not the problem of RF focusing if camera is in working order. As you might know it is limit of the DOF and recomposing after focusing and focus shift which comes with fast lenses as well.
 

flavio81

Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2014
Messages
5,097
Location
Lima, Peru
Format
Medium Format
In the pocket? No doubt. For in the pocket I used to have XA, BTW.

Retina for the win. The Retina IIIc has an excellent f2.0 lens, 50mm instead of that wide thing, more precise rangefinder, full manual control, and more beauty and smoothness.
 

blockend

Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2010
Messages
5,049
Location
northern eng
Format
35mm
I'm after getting distracted by some leica m4/4-2/4-p. If you were to pick one leica for life under the 6/700 mark, What would it be? I read that the m4s can't be adjusted, And what they go out of wack you need a new part, but I've also read that the steel parts are sturdier, which last the longest after a CLA?
also whats with ''simplifying the range finder'' can i still nail focus with a f1.1 50mm?
Some people swear the only authentic Leica experience is a Barnack with a 50. Others say it's a double stroke M3 and yet more say it's the Leica lenses that make the brand what it is and everything else is a half-measure. Really, it's what you make it. Unless you're buying from a dealer with a returns policy, it makes sense to put a pot of money aside for a CLA. Rangefinders go out of line, curtains get holed, shutters cap, it's what happens to decades old cameras and if you're not technical the fixes cost £$£$.

Ask yourself why you want a Leica. If it's the optical quality it'll be expensive, more so if you want a variety of lenses. If it's the quality of the engineering and the rangefinder experience, you can pick up a user M from about £400, maybe less. Truth be told a Leica is a pretty specialised tool for anyone coming from an SLR, and most effective close to the 50mm norm. I wouldn't be without mine, but I wouldn't have one as my only film camera.
 

Jim Jones

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
3,740
Location
Chillicothe MO
Format
Multi Format
Retina for the win. The Retina IIIc has an excellent f2.0 lens, 50mm instead of that wide thing, more precise rangefinder, full manual control, and more beauty and smoothness.

The Retina IIIc does have a nice lens and is a great pocket camera, but it certainly does not have the build quality of a Leica. If it is handled carefully, it should produce good photos for many years. It does have some delicate parts. In comparison, my M4 has over 40 years of hard use with no problems at all.
 

ColColt

Member
Joined
May 26, 2015
Messages
1,824
Location
TN
Format
Multi Format
About eight months ago I bought an excellent M2 that had been CLA'd by DAG three years prior and was shown the receipt by the seller. It had his familiar "92" where normally you'd see the "L" when you take the chrome screw out. It was super fine except it was a tad out of alignment.

I talked with Youxin Ye about it and he told me to buy some better screwdrivers than the ones I spoke with him about and got some with a 2mm tip, the size needed to make the adjustment. After doing that it's been perfect and I can';t think of a better Leica, at least for me, in that it has lines for the 35, 50 and 90mm lens...all I'd ever use...wonderful camera.
 

macfred

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 6, 2014
Messages
3,839
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
OP
OP

seanE

Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
172
Format
35mm
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom