First Large Format (Ignorance and Expense)

Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
9,457
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format

I'm using the free version of speelcheck. Thnaks.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
9,457
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format

Thanks, I'll try it out see what it looks like using a couple of my lenses.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,939
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Thanks, I'll try it out see what it looks like using a couple of my lenses.

It will be exactly the same size subject frame, no matter the lens. The only thing that will change with the lens is the subject to camera distance, and therefore the perspective.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
9,457
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format
It will be exactly the same size subject frame, no matter the lens. The only thing that will change with the lens is the subject to camera distance, and therefore the perspective.

Yes I get that. But the wider angle lens should give me more magnification because I have more bellow's draw. Right?
 

wiltw

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 4, 2008
Messages
6,450
Location
SF Bay area
Format
Multi Format
Alan Edward Klein said:
But the wider angle lens should give me more magnification because I have more bellow's draw. Right?
Shooting with 4x5
  • 150mm lens at 10' will see 6.4' x 8' in the frame
  • 75mm lens at 5' will see 6.4' x 8' in the frame
  • 58mm lens at 3.85' will see 6.4 x 8' in the frame
Bellows draw limitations will have zero applicability at those shooting distances!...that only matters at 'macro' magnifications, and I fail to see how 'macro' comes into play for any definition of 'landscape close up'...6.4' tall area captured within a 4" tall frame is only about 1/20 of actual size!
 
Last edited:

FotoD

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2020
Messages
390
Location
EU
Format
Analog


It comes into play for *all* scenes at and around a magnification of 1:1.

Please tell us how you would fill the 4x5 negative with a 5" tall flower using Alans 300mm lens and 350mm bellows, since bellows draw is no limitation to you.
 

wiltw

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 4, 2008
Messages
6,450
Location
SF Bay area
Format
Multi Format
It comes into play for *all* scenes at and around a magnification of 1:1.

Please tell us how you would fill the 4x5 negative with a 5" tall flower using Alans 300mm lens and 350mm bellows, since bellows draw is no limitation to you.

A 1:1 is 'macro', and hardly a 'landscape' in most understanding, ergo the questions of what is meant by 'close landscape'!
If the suubject is 1:10 ( 1/10 of life size) the exposure compensation due to bellows draw is less than 1/4EV
 
OP
OP
Joined
Nov 10, 2022
Messages
90
Location
Hattiesburg, MS
Format
Multi Format
Do y'all know of a good system for storing undeveloped exposed film? (Is it even considered a negative if you haven't developed it yet?). So far I have one double film holder and I plan on taking more than two images. Unfortunately I won't be able to get the images developed until probably sometime in January. Any recommendations on how I should store them until I can get them developed?
 

AnselMortensen

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 9, 2020
Messages
2,468
Location
SFBayArea
Format
Traditional
Usually unprocessed film is stored in an old empty 3-part film box.
If you don't have an extra one, post a WTB ad in the classifieds here.
After you burn through a few boxes of film, you'll have extras.
An old, empty 8x10 photo paper box can sometimes do, in a pinch, if you put the film in the black plastic bag first.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,939
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Whatever you do, mark the storage container really, really clearly!
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
9,457
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format
If you can't get empty film boxes until you use some, try these lightproof plastic film bags.
 

wiltw

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 4, 2008
Messages
6,450
Location
SF Bay area
Format
Multi Format
If you lack an empty 4x5 film box, you can...
  1. double a sheet of aluminum foil, into a double-thickness base
  2. fold the double-thickness base to form an 'envelope' into which you place exposed film
  3. fold up the the 3 open sides of the 'envelope', then again fold the three edge folds, forming a light baffle that prevents entry of light
  4. put the 'envelope' inside something that is somewhat light tight, giving it protection from the foil tearing.
While I was shooting professionally, I might find myself short of a 4x5 box to take film to a pro lab for processing...I would do the above, to give the lab the film, and not have to worry about getting the box back when picking up the processed film.
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,079
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format

It can be dangerous...my film comes between two pieces of cardboard inside the black plastic bag...and in a pinch I have reloaded holders by putting the exposed film (not negatives yet!) between one of the pieces of cardboard and the bag, knowing the unexposed is in between the two pieces of cardboard. I have also used a couple plastic bags from photo paper and a photopaper box as temporary storage.

My preference is going straight from the holders into my developing drums...the less handling the better...but not always possible. On very long trips I would have several old film boxes to unload into, separating the exposed film by type and/or development needs.
 

DREW WILEY

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
13,934
Format
8x10 Format
First of all, buy more film holders. After that, you might think of a little film changing tent or changing bag. The exposed film is put inside a regular 3-part film box, properly labeled so that you don't confuse it with fresh film.
 
OP
OP
Joined
Nov 10, 2022
Messages
90
Location
Hattiesburg, MS
Format
Multi Format
First of all, buy more film holders. After that, you might think of a little film changing tent or changing bag. The exposed film is put inside a regular 3-part film box, properly labeled so that you don't confuse it with fresh film.

I meant to order more, thought I was ordering two but the package only came with one. Will plan on getting more ASAP. Want at least 10 lying around for longer trips.
 

otto.f

Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2017
Messages
350
Location
Netherlands
Format
Multi Format
I'd get a small tape measure for bellows calculations, a notebook (and a small calculator if you don't use your phone).

That’s a good one. I wonder why LF camera makers don’t do that standard
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,649
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format

As mentioned above, strong, reading glasses, a reasonable replacement for a loupe.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
9,457
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format

DREW WILEY

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
13,934
Format
8x10 Format
Various easy to use bellows extension aids have been marketed in the past. Calumet had an excellent one which was small and didn't require any math or any tape rule, and would work with ANY lens. I don't know if they ever turn up used or not. A previous post by tih links an analogous product.
 
OP
OP
Joined
Nov 10, 2022
Messages
90
Location
Hattiesburg, MS
Format
Multi Format
So, what prevents one from taking your light meter and sticking it behind the ground glass? Seems like that'd give you an accurate reading, right? You'd have to make sure that your meter is pointing exactly where you want it, be a little more precise with where you aim but I don't see many reasons why that wouldn't work.
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,294
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
You'd also have to test against direct reading at various positions on the ground glass to work out a table of compensation factors. The ground glass isn't the same brightness as the scene, varies with the aperture of the lens, and if the lens is even as wide as a "normal" focal length, there will be significant brightness difference from the center to the corners.

Not to say it can't be done; TTL and off-the-film metering in sophisticated 35 mm and medium format cameras -- like the metered chimney viewfinder for my RB67 -- does essentially this (as modified in the latter case with a reflection factor for the film emulsion) -- but it's generally easier to meter the scene, either incident (to get an average that will automatically make highlights light and shadows dark) or spot metering to place important shadow values correctly (2-3 stops below metered value to get them on Zones III or II).
 
OP
OP
Joined
Nov 10, 2022
Messages
90
Location
Hattiesburg, MS
Format
Multi Format
And, correct me if I'm wrong here, I don't have to worry about bellows extension factor unless I'm doing macro photography, right? I may do a full body portrait on occasion but as far as I know, that's still far enough away I don't have to worry about light dropoff.
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,294
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
The rule of thumb that came up in another thread last week is that as long as you're 10x the lens focal length from your subject, bellows extension won't affect exposure enough to notice even on slide film. For portraits with normal or wider lenses, you may need 1/3 stop -- which is negligible for almost any B&W or color negative film.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…