Finally a bit of success.

Discussion in 'Pinhole Photography' started by Grandpa Ron, Oct 10, 2018.

  1. Grandpa Ron

    Grandpa Ron Member
    Ads Enabled

    Messages:
    19
    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2018
    Location:
    Northwest Indiana
    Shooter:
    35mm
    I have been trying to get as sharp a pin hole photo for a while.

    I decided to try as small a pinhole as I could make, (.356 mm) as close to the film plain as I could mount it.(61.5 mm). this gave me an f 170 aperture.

    The subjects were simple a swing at about 25 meters, and a windmill base at about 75 meters.

    The photos are as shot, with fujicolor 200 and printed to a disc by the photo lab.

    Certainly not the best but a good starting point.

    I want to thank all the folks on the forum for their encouragement and suggestions.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. OptiKen

    OptiKen Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,001
    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2013
    Location:
    Orange County
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    Congratulations.
    I really love the romantic feelings in the swing shot especially.
     
  3. Jim Jones

    Jim Jones Subscriber
    Ads Enabled

    Messages:
    3,035
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Location:
    Chillicothe MO
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    That's very close to the pinhole diameter given by the Lord Rayleigh constant in calculating the diameter. Slightly smaller pinholes should make slightly sharper images, but not enough to bother with as long as you're getting such nice results.
     
  4. DWThomas

    DWThomas Subscriber
    Ads Enabled

    Messages:
    3,541
    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2006
    Location:
    SE Pennsylvania
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Definitely shows progress! I agree with Jim Jones, a little smaller yet might be sharper, but you're getting some "painterly" images which could be quite acceptable as they are.
     
  5. wyofilm

    wyofilm Subscriber
    Ads Enabled

    Messages:
    281
    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2017
    Location:
    Wyoming
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Looking great!
     
  6. MattKing

    MattKing Subscriber
    Ads Enabled

    Messages:
    23,349
    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2005
    Location:
    Delta, BC, Canada
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Looks like you are making progress.
    One thing that it helps to understand is that when you use film with a pinhole, how you go about creating a print from that film is quite important. A pinhole image is almost by definition deficient in edge sharpness, which is a major component of apparent sharpness.
    Here is a resized but otherwise not heavily manipulated "snip" from a relatively high resolution scan from a larger, 6x9 negative:

    upload_2018-10-10_21-16-59.png

    And this is the result after some aggressive post-processing work, particularly with the the Unsharp Mask tool:

    upload_2018-10-10_21-20-25.png

    Not bad, considering this was taken using an exposure of about 30 seconds - our friends are great sports!

    In case you were wondering, this is how our friends appear on 120 colour negative film exposed in an older but more "normal" folding, scale focus camera:

    upload_2018-10-10_21-25-48.png
     
  7. ciniframe

    ciniframe Member
    Ads Enabled

    Messages:
    455
    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2014
    Shooter:
    Sub 35mm
    This line puzzles me. In a earlier post you mentioned trying pinhole in an 'old SLR'. Most of the 35mm film SLRs I know of had a lens flange to film distance of around 44~46mm and a pinhole mounted to a body cap should be at about that distance, especially mounted inside the cap. On the front of the body cap a flap made from black construction paper and black masking tape can serve as a shutter if need be. All in all though, you are making some nice progress.
     
  8. OP
    OP
    Grandpa Ron

    Grandpa Ron Member
    Ads Enabled

    Messages:
    19
    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2018
    Location:
    Northwest Indiana
    Shooter:
    35mm
    Ciniframe

    Well let me explain, The camera I am using is an old Praktica. It was made in East Germany probably in the 1960's. It is the type of camera you buy used when you are first married and broke. :smile:

    Yes the distance from the film plain to the outside of the camera body is 45 mm but the cap for the lens hole has long since disappeared. My pinholes are mounted on a series of 3 concentric tubes, the innermost tube dropping into lens hole, supported by the outer two. At the time, the shortest tube I could cut without crushing was 61.5 mm.

    However, your suggestion has given me a idea; the inner tube to a flat disk should mount flush with the body. Sealing light leaks will be the biggest issue. Also the aperture will increase to f 130 or so.

    If I did not want to change the pinhole lens I could just use double backed foam tape. However, I find it very convenient to set up the shot with the standard lens then switch to the pinhole.

    Thanks for the suggestion.
     
  9. ciniframe

    ciniframe Member
    Ads Enabled

    Messages:
    455
    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2014
    Shooter:
    Sub 35mm
    Grandpa Ron;
    If it is a Praktica it should be a M42 thread body cap. They are available from several Chinese sellers on ebay for $1 or $2 each, just search "M42 body cap". From China be prepared to wait 10 to 25 days for them to arrive. I'd order 3~5 so you can have several to experiment with.
     
  10. Nick Dvoracek

    Nick Dvoracek Member
    Ads Enabled

    Messages:
    15
    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2018
    Location:
    Oshkosh WI
    Shooter:
    Pinhole
    You don’t really need a proper body cap. I did it once by taping a binocular lens cap on to my Canon F-1
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies. If you have a Photrio account, please log in (and select 'stay logged in') to prevent recurrence of this notice.