Filtering lith prints or not?

Diner

A
Diner

  • 3
  • 0
  • 69
Gulf Nonox

A
Gulf Nonox

  • 9
  • 3
  • 92
Druidstone

A
Druidstone

  • 8
  • 3
  • 128
On The Mound.

A
On The Mound.

  • 1
  • 0
  • 75
Ancient Camphor

D
Ancient Camphor

  • 6
  • 1
  • 88

Forum statistics

Threads
197,806
Messages
2,764,788
Members
99,480
Latest member
815 Photo
Recent bookmarks
1
Joined
Oct 4, 2018
Messages
188
Location
Europe
Format
35mm
Hello , has anyone advice on this? A lith question.

Lith printing requires an overexposure of 2 - 3 stops based on a conventional black and white exposure. This is done with magenta , cyan and yellow filters.

Do i have to use the same C, M, Y filtering for exposure of my lith print again?

Or do i have to deactivate those filters?

And let it unfiltered expose the negative?
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,500
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
What kind of paper are you using. Most of the paper I used to use, didn't show any difference in the light used during exposure. I use white light to get a shorter exposure.
 

Dali

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2009
Messages
1,838
Location
Philadelphia
Format
Multi Format
Ask yourself what would be the purpose of these filters in the lith process...
 
OP
OP
silvercloud2323
Joined
Oct 4, 2018
Messages
188
Location
Europe
Format
35mm
Ask yourself what would be the purpose of these filters in the lith process...
Good question, i guess control contrast in high and lowlights.

But i thought in lith prints, the contrast was controlled by exposure and development ?
 
Last edited:

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
21,244
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
You generally don't use the cyan filter!

As to using filters for with prints: yes, you can use them for lith, but they are much less needed than for regular printing. With lith, you generally control contrast through exposure and development. Expose less and develop longer for higher contrast, and vice versa.

When doing lith, you overexpose the paper dramatically and the effect of this is that your highlights will never blow out. This extreme compensating effect virtually eradicates the need to use contrast filters in exposure. The depth of the shadows is then controlled as indicated above, through exposure and development.

Still, you definitely can use contrast filters, too - it's just that it's not really needed, and mostly results in already long exposure times getting even longer since the filters absorb some light.
 

jimjm

Subscriber
Joined
May 2, 2007
Messages
1,223
Location
San Diego CA
Format
Multi Format
The density and detail in the highlights and midtones is increased with more exposure. The shadows are determined by the amount of time you leave the print in the developer. Snatching the print at the right time is extremely important to keep the shadows from blocking up. Tim Rudman's lith printing books have been a huge help for me.
Short exposure = higher contrast but muted colors (generally)
Long exposure = lower contrast and richer colors (generally)
With a long exposure, the highlights and midtones have a chance to develop details before the shadows start to get too dark.
Using filters will have little to no effect with lithable papers. I use no filters and this helps to keep the exposure times as short as possible.

The image below was from a high-contrast scene and the grass in the foreground kept going all black before the clouds started showing any detail. This took a +3.5 stop exposure with a lot of burning in the sky and some dodging in the center of the image. I got one print I liked on old Forte Fortezo paper, but haven't been able to recreate it yet on new Foma 131 paper. Every paper is different and your choice of developer type and dilution will also make a difference.

Boulder Oaks_sm.jpg
 
OP
OP
silvercloud2323
Joined
Oct 4, 2018
Messages
188
Location
Europe
Format
35mm
You generally don't use the cyan filter!

As to using filters for with prints: yes, you can use them for lith, but they are much less needed than for regular printing. With lith, you generally control contrast through exposure and development. Expose less and develop longer for higher contrast, and vice versa.

When doing lith, you overexpose the paper dramatically and the effect of this is that your highlights will never blow out. This extreme compensating effect virtually eradicates the need to use contrast filters in exposure. The depth of the shadows is then controlled as indicated above, through exposure and development.

Still, you definitely can use contrast filters, too - it's just that it's not really needed, and mostly results in already long exposure times getting even longer since the filters absorb some light.

Thank you!
one more question:

To decide what basic exposure time i'm going to use , with an over-exposure of 2 - 3 steps for the lith print. I take a basic exposure on the enlarger of my film.
But that exposure is based on measurement (conventional photography), With the filters applied ...
When I want to do my lith exposure ,i take that basic exposure + 2-3 steps more, but then Without the filters.
Will there not be a problem? IT does not correspond anymore to my point of view.
The first is based on filters and the second no more.

Or have i forgotten something?
 
OP
OP
silvercloud2323
Joined
Oct 4, 2018
Messages
188
Location
Europe
Format
35mm
The density and detail in the highlights and midtones is increased with more exposure. The shadows are determined by the amount of time you leave the print in the developer. Snatching the print at the right time is extremely important to keep the shadows from blocking up. Tim Rudman's lith printing books have been a huge help for me.
Short exposure = higher contrast but muted colors (generally)
Long exposure = lower contrast and richer colors (generally)
With a long exposure, the highlights and midtones have a chance to develop details before the shadows start to get too dark.
Using filters will have little to no effect with lithable papers. I use no filters and this helps to keep the exposure times as short as possible.

The image below was from a high-contrast scene and the grass in the foreground kept going all black before the clouds started showing any detail. This took a +3.5 stop exposure with a lot of burning in the sky and some dodging in the center of the image. I got one print I liked on old Forte Fortezo paper, but haven't been able to recreate it yet on new Foma 131 paper. Every paper is different and your choice of developer type and dilution will also make a difference.

View attachment 373901
Thanks for the answer
Love the image!
The colours, the sky and sun...
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
21,244
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
For determining the base exposure, it's Ok to not use the filters at all. Just make a print/strip so that you get the midtones approximately right and don't worry about the rest. Add 3 stops or so to that exposure and lith process. Then adjust your exposure and development depending on how that first test comes out.
 

Dali

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2009
Messages
1,838
Location
Philadelphia
Format
Multi Format
The density and detail in the highlights and midtones is increased with more exposure. The shadows are determined by the amount of time you leave the print in the developer. Snatching the print at the right time is extremely important to keep the shadows from blocking up. Tim Rudman's lith printing books have been a huge help for me.
Short exposure = higher contrast but muted colors (generally)
Long exposure = lower contrast and richer colors (generally)
With a long exposure, the highlights and midtones have a chance to develop details before the shadows start to get too dark.
Using filters will have little to no effect with lithable papers. I use no filters and this helps to keep the exposure times as short as possible.

The image below was from a high-contrast scene and the grass in the foreground kept going all black before the clouds started showing any detail. This took a +3.5 stop exposure with a lot of burning in the sky and some dodging in the center of the image. I got one print I liked on old Forte Fortezo paper, but haven't been able to recreate it yet on new Foma 131 paper. Every paper is different and your choice of developer type and dilution will also make a difference.

View attachment 373901

Great print! But, I agree, it is difficult to get the same result with a different paper (and even with the same paper...).
 

jimjm

Subscriber
Joined
May 2, 2007
Messages
1,223
Location
San Diego CA
Format
Multi Format
Thanks for the answer
Love the image!
The colours, the sky and sun...

Thanks!
For the first base exposure, I use the same paper, but develop in standard developer. Get an exposure time that gives the desired detail in the midtones then add however many stops of exposure you want. Then develop the following prints in the Lith developer until the shadows get as dark as you want. This is the biggest challenge for me - determining the right moment to snatch the print from the developer before the shadows get too dense, or the image starts to show mottling. Keep notes about your dilutions, exposure times and snatch times for each print and you'll learn to predict the consequences for adjusting these variables for different images.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom