Fill tank 6 oz water. Invert 10 times in 30 sec. Repeat 3 more times. Do not use fix with hardener.
You don`t need no fancy washer that uses a ton of water.
Hypo Clearing Agent - and all such sulfite based washing aids - helps with making it easier to remove hypo from film or fiber based paper regardless of what method is used to wash the material. The most common explanation of the mechanism I have heard is that it expands and opens up the emulsion so that hypo can diffuse out more quickly and easily.ok i meant if i don't use one of those washers that fills from the bottom and use the ilford washing method (fill, invert 5 times, dump, fill, invert 10 times etc.). would hypo clear still help with the process?
Here's a quick way to test your fixer. It's been repeated here more times than I care to count, but here goes anyway. Mind you, this is all predicated on the fact that different films have different clearing times so it is important that you do this test with the same type of film each time. Sacrifice a roll of the cheapest, nastiest B&W film you can find. It will last a long time because you need only about an inch or so to do the test. Next time you mix up a fresh batch of fixer, take about an inch of your "fixer test film", place 1 drop of fresh fixer on the emulsion side and let it sit for about 30 seconds. After 30 seconds or so, immerse the film into the fresh fixer and note how long it takes for the film to clear completely. The area where you placed the initial drop will clear first, and when it's no longer visible, the film is cleared. You should get at least 4 or 5 rolls of film through 1L of fixer before any obvious sign of exhaustion begins to manifest itself. After that, run the test again after each couple of rolls. If the clearing time is still more or less the same as the original clearing time, you're still good. When the clearing time approaches 2x the original time, the fixer is very close to exhaustion and should be discarded.
I make a big thing about this, but it's really important. Getting the names right makes a huge difference in darkroom work. Clarity with nomenclature isn't optional: hypo is one thing; hypo clearing agent quite different. Likewise, sulfite and sulfides are not to be swapped. Each seems trivial, but see what happens when you get the wrong one into a process .....thanks for the info fschifano, that will be very usefulbut i was actually asking about hypo clear.
great, thanks for all the information
new question, if i keep pouring used hypo back into the bottle to reuse, how will i know when the hypo is bad?
oh wow i thought hypo and hypo clearing agent are the same! I was talking about hypo clearing agent, how do you know when they're not usable anymore? >< sorry guys!
No apology needed.... how do you know when they're not usable anymore? >< sorry guys!
oh wow i thought hypo and hypo clearing agent are the same! I was talking about hypo clearing agent, how do you know when they're not usable anymore? >< sorry guys!
Since HCA usually doesn't last more than a session, save yourself some money and order Sodium Sulfite from PF (http://www.freestylephoto.biz/101340-Formulary-Sodium-Sulfite-Powder-1-lb). 5g/L should be fine for film/paper HCA, w/ 20g/L recommended for polysulphide stop-baths (not something you have to worry about right now).
I second this recommendation. However, the official Kodak formula for Hypo Clearing Agent (HCA) asks for 20g/l of sodium sulfite for film and paper, making it a 2% solution. The ingredients are easy to obtain and the solution is easy to prepare. It might get you into mixing all your own chemicals!
oh wow i thought hypo and hypo clearing agent are the same! I was talking about hypo clearing agent, how do you know when they're not usable anymore? >< sorry guys!
thank you for all the suggestions.
I don't do prints, i only develop the film. Ralph, so i don't need the sodium hexametaphosphate if i don't do prints, correct?
What sort of fix is given the film.
Two extremes: A fix given in a full strength nearly
exhausted fixer and a fix given using a more dilute
fresh one-shot fix.
It should be obvious that the washing procedures for
each of the two extremes should differ. The suppliers
of the chemistry are no help. They supply us with their
usual one-size-fits-all instructions. And who trusts or
follows those instructions? There are a lot of posts
this thread which describe way ward methods.
The suppliers never mention the use of fresh very
dilute one-shot fix. Yet on every point I believe it to
be a method superior to any other method. A few of
those points; fresh fix each film or films, no need to
rebottle, no records to keep, no need for tests of
strength. Also the fixer's silver load is Very low.
The fixer being very dilute and loaded very
little with silver makes for a water
efficient quick wash. Dan
Given the endless posts here (and I assume elsewhere) detailing confusion regarding, for example: the dilutions for HC-110, the syrup, the intermediate strength stock solution, and various working strength solutions, it's no wonder manufacturers will not offer usually more than one way to do things. Users sometimes seem unwilling to read through the directions and pick out what makes sense.... The suppliers of the chemistry are no help. They supply us with their usual one-size-fits-all instructions ...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?