Film Specific Colour Profiles and Flex Color

Discussion in 'Scanning and Scanners' started by Kuby, Jun 1, 2018.

  1. Kuby

    Kuby Member

    Messages:
    80
    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2017
    Location:
    Edmonton
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    Hello,

    I'm curious to know, of those of you out there who use or own imacon/flextight scanners, who uses colour specific film profiles vs. who uses generic profiles?

    For the last few years I have been using generic profiles and was getting what I thought were pretty good results. I've seldom been totally satisfied, but I thought the results I was getting were often pretty good. Today, for whatever reason, I thought I would play around with film specific profiles and see what the difference might be. To my surprise, I noticed that the results seemed vastly superior on almost every single frame I experimented with. The gamma values across the RGB channels seemed much more "true", resulting in more pleasing tones, contrast, and colour. I think from now on I will make use of the profiles much more regularly. The film stocks I am scanning were all Portra 160/400 in both 35mm and 120mm formats, and I was making use of the portra NC/VC profiles.

    What is the experience of other users out there?
     
  2. philipus

    philipus Member

    Messages:
    156
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2012
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    Well I use generic profiles because I prefer getting flat and boring scans since I do all post-processing in Adobe Camera Raw, Color Perfect and Photoshop. I tried the built-in film profiles but find that they just don't look like I want my film images to look. It may be that these profiles are how the various films are "supposed to look", but I don't know that. I only know that they don't look particularly good, to my eyes. Since I use Color Perfect for C41 I have a profile built based on some info I found on the CP site to get as "linear scan as possible", which those who know claim isn't as linear as it should be. But it works for me and for all my C41, including that darn difficult Ektar. And then I have one for E6 which is similarly flat and boring and great for post-processing. Your post has made me curious though so I'll play around a bit with the built-in profiles just to see.

    br
    Philip

     
  3. Lachlan Young

    Lachlan Young Member

    Messages:
    1,348
    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2005
    Location:
    Glasgow
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I avoid all the internal inversions, scan as a positive including some neg rebate & with a slight correction curve on what will become the highlights after the inversion, then do the rest in Photoshop. The critical stages involve sampling & dividing out the mask (as chromogenic paper would see the negative) & manually clipping black & white points following the clipping warnings etc. The colour is astoundingly accurate to the tonalities of the film - ie Portra 400's slight warmth Vs Portra 160 etc. It's harder to describe than do & the results blow away the canned profiles of Flexcolor or Colorperfect. Ektar becomes very well behaved too.
     
,