Me too. If I couldn't develop and print my own film I wouldn't bother with film at all. It's really the darkroom work that I enjoy so much.
It’s not realistic for the average person to print all of the work they want to have as viewable.
Scanning serves many functions.
- A good replacement for contact sheets and drugstore prints, to simply see what you got.
- A way to share your work with others quickly and in a multitude of ways.
- A way to print really big without having to master that and get giant trays.
- A way to do with all the data on the film, what would be hard or impossible to do in a darkroom.
What’s more colour/RA4 is not as accessible as B&W to the beginner. So it’s a good way to get colour prints,
if and only
if the scan is good.
Scanning is here to stay. You might as well embrace it. You have almost all the benefits of film combined with the benefits of digital manipulation.
What’s more, other processes in the past and today for capturing and reproducing film images also involved steps and media that didn’t have the characteristics of photo paper or was in some respects almost digital.
Various types of printing for books, magazines and posters come to mind.
Never heard sneering or particular bias towards those.
On the contrary photo books are very respected as reproductions of an artist oeuvre. Whether captured from prints or directly from the negative or chrome.