FILM in luggage is BAD, but is PAPER in luggage GOOD?

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,521
Messages
2,776,526
Members
99,638
Latest member
Jux9pr
Recent bookmarks
0

polyglot

Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2009
Messages
3,467
Location
South Australia
Format
Medium Format
X-rays will expose anything sensitive. Of course you need more to expose paper than film, but I would expect that there is more than enough power in airport scanners to put good stripes on your paper.

For reference, an ISO100 film can get nice dense stripes in it. Paper is maybe ISO6-12, which is 3-4 stops slower. So the markings will still show up on it if you go through the wrong scanner.

Of course you may get lucky; I put a test roll in some luggage for about 5 consecutive flights across China and Australia and it came out clean.
 

JLP

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
1,608
Location
Oregon
Format
Multi Format
I recently did a similar test as Polyglot but involuntarily. On a recent trip to Europe i bought 2 bricks of 100 Iso film and put it in my cary on luggage as i always do with film.
Well, in the early morning check in they told me that my carry on was to heavy and needed to be checked. I forgot i had the film in it and didn't get it out.
When i enetered the security it dawned on me that i just wasted two bricks of film.
Back home i developed an unexposed roll to see what it looked like. To my surprice it came out completely clear with no signs of x-ray.
To me that indicates that not all luggage are x-rayed.
You could be lucky with the paper but that is a big risk to take.
 

Mr Student

Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2010
Messages
17
Location
Melbourne, A
Format
Medium Format
I had to put a half finished pack of Instax film in an Instax camera in my checked bags from Australia to the US and didn't see any streaking or X-ray exposure damage on the checked film. So I did it a few more times on internal US flights (with the camera being so bulky) and again didn't see any problems with the resulting shots.
 
OP
OP

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,833
Format
Hybrid
well, i know about the film -deal. (BTDT )
but i am planning a trip where i hope to bring LARGE sheets of paper ( 16x20? ) and
it is too big for my carry on, and may be metal plates coated with emulsion ...
i don't want to deal with the carry on scanner for the metal plates the operators won't understand
when i say " they are metal plates with emulsion coated on them, you know, to make olde fashioned metal photos like "this" (showing them a tintype) "
so i figured packing all this stuff in my luggage would be better, but i don't know ...
the emulsion i hope to use is relatively slow ( maybe asa 1 if i am lucky ) and some normal-stuff - iso 6-24 )
it might get tricky i guess ...
 

polyglot

Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2009
Messages
3,467
Location
South Australia
Format
Medium Format
The signs in AU airports say that luggage may be scanned. So probably not all of it is, and my guess is that there are differing levels of technology (exposure levels applied) depending in where you are. There are occasional threads that pop up even now on APUG and LFPF where people go "what are all these stripes and wavy things on my film", so there are still scanners out there damaging some film. Just not much of it.
 

TheFlyingCamera

Membership Council
Advertiser
Joined
May 24, 2005
Messages
11,546
Location
Washington DC
Format
Multi Format
The other option of course is to ship the stuff to your destination via FedEx. The reason I say FedEx in particular is that they actually do listen to instructions on handling of packages, unlike UPS or the Post Office. You'll KNOW the stuff will arrive ok, and if it doesn't, you'll be compensated assuming you insure it. You'll not get that from the airline, ever.
 

ath

Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2006
Messages
844
Location
Germany
Format
35mm
I think if you put metal plates in your luggage the chance that it gets special treatment (i.e. powerful scan) is high.
 
OP
OP

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,833
Format
Hybrid
thanks scott, i'll think about that ..
thanks for the reality check andreas, yeah, you're probably right ...
 

spijker

Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2007
Messages
625
Location
Ottawa, Canada
Format
Medium Format
I've also been "lucky" with accidentally leaving 3 rolls of exposed film in my checked luggage from Berlin to Amsterdam. No problem. However, there's also this story: (there was a url link here which no longer exists)
 
OP
OP

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,833
Format
Hybrid
i spoke with the maker of emulsion and was told there are too many factors to know if liquid emulsion coated stuff will be ok
and spoke with people i know who work for airlines to told me ( BOTH PEOPLE ) that ALL INTERNATIONAL flights' baggage gets XRAYED ...

u guess it will be carry on if-when the time comes ...

thanks again for your help !
john
 
Joined
Jun 4, 2013
Messages
33
Format
Multi Format
The current state-of-the-art security scanners use dual or multi energy photons from 5keV to 250keV to simultaneously determine composition as well as visual structure. If you have metal in your luggage, it will automatically go to high power with a narrow sweep width (on the order of 1-2mm). Chest x-rays use beam energies around 120keV. If you manage to wake up one these scanners so they jump to 250keV, you might even screw up sensitized photo paper.
 

clayne

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2008
Messages
2,764
Location
San Francisc
Format
Multi Format
Not all checked in luggage is scanned. My MIL just brought over like 30 rolls of black and white I left at their place in NZ and where did she put them? Yep. Checked luggage. Haven't had a chance to even test some, but I'm not terribly worried.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom