I threw in some cash but I have a hard time believing the cost of moving the equipment is under a few million. Maybe its enough to get the special components that aren't scale dependent leaving the rest for scrap. I imagine that rollers are useful, but the 9 story space between the top and bottom is just a light tight box of warm air. The roller supports would be the wrong size anyway for a scaled down unit.
The may be reading this thread here. They now want to save the CTA film base machinery, which Robert seabrook has previously described as a monster to keep running. Perhaps they are not happy with buying film base form outside like Ilford has been doing. They also want to to save the Full on Chemical synthesis factory, AND the industrial sized coater. Which several here have wondered if the research coater is capable of producing consistent colour film.
One thing that I wonder is the "numbered limited edition" of the rewards film prizes, are we supposed to just cherish these collectables or are they actually going to be useable film?
Sorry I ment goal and typed something else. I hope this clarified what I wroteThey're making coal? I thought they were making film.![]()
According to the interview in the latest Film Photography Podcast, the research coater works but its output volume is too small to serve the market, and the full-scale machinery is too large to be economical. They are planning to take apart the full-scale machines and build smaller machines from them, machines that will fit into the building Film-Ferrania have. The buildings the machines are in now are going down on schedule whether the machines are inside or not.
I'm assuming the reward films will be made on the research coater (I didn't watch the video).
... If that was the case, they probably would need the same capacity as kodak has to meet supply and demand, especially if kodak and fuji stop production.
Who even designs such machinery?
Kodak's formal accounts seem to say that value of sales of legacy products continues to fall... inkjet cartridges and film are lumped together,
maybe Im reading them wrong?
But on a more practical note in '86 my price list shows that there was an Ilford colour transparency film Ilfachrome for sale in Jessops eg 35mm x36 at 2.09 GBP.
Have they mentioned anything along the lines about making sheet film?
Re: 4x5 film - it's of course in the plans for the future, as are many other formats and emulsions, but still WAY too many things to do before we can make any promises...
I'm sure Simon once said Harman has engineers with colour emulsions knowledge. In other words, they have the expertise to do it.
I'm sure Simon once said Harman has engineers with colour emulsions knowledge. In other words, they have the expertise to do it.
Hi Ricardo
I have Ilford slides and Ilford prints, from Ilford film.
But they pulled out of colour and cine decade(s) ago.
They may not see sufficient market for an investment. to get back in.
Yes. Conclusively. Unambiguously. Unequivocally.Simon also said here on APUG that Ilford has no plans to make any sort of color film.
PE
Simon also said here on APUG that Ilford has no plans to make any sort of color film.
PE
Simon also said here on APUG that Ilford has no plans to make any sort of color film.
PE
How good is this film that they're trying to revive? ScotchChrome 100.
I've never shot it and the reviews I see online are not very positive. Especially for the 400 speed version people say it's super grainy.
Is this going to be anywhere close to the quality of slide film that Fujifilm is offering?
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |