I noticed they said "for printing on reversal papers" as well in the documentation. Do you think they are planning to come out with print paper for this?
Sent w/ iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent w/ iPhone using Tapatalk
I noticed they said "for printing on reversal papers" as well in the documentation. Do you think they are planning to come out with print paper for this?
Sent w/ iPhone using Tapatalk
Notice they posted "just for reference" the tech sheet.
The RMS of 13 called my attention; Higher than RSX200 (12) and Provia 400X (11). Not a criticism, just something curious and interpreting things by numbers can be a no-no, in the pub they base it as "diffuse granularity".
Positioning a new Pos-Pos printing paper/process seems tough; Also, not on their roadmap.
I noticed they said "for printing on reversal papers" as well in the documentation.
That data sheet was issued in 2000 - thirteen years ago. Back then there WERE reversal Colour papers. Printing commercially these days is generally by methods we don't think about on APUG, and Positive or Negative is just the flip of a button.

"Are forbidden to talk about" not "don't think about." At least I personally don't obey thought police.![]()
Agreed, stay out of my head!!
Also, the Positive IS the end product, the print isn't... so technically, once you've developed the transparency, any "hybrid" work is ok according to the APUG rules ...so scanning your transparency to print it is A-OK especially since NEW papers/chems aren't being made... hehe, I should have been a lawyer...

One word. Internegative.![]()
One word. Internegative.![]()
It's certainly POSSIBLE, and has advantages and some people are doing it. But the challenges and learning curve are certainly more than Ilfochrome or Type R were and more than scanning and printing, at least for anyone who already knows the basis of scanning, post manipulating and printing anything.
There's an interview in Japancamerahunter:
http://www.japancamerahunter.com/2013/08/film-news-ferrania-is-back-exclusive-interview/
agreed!I never did my own color printing, but my printer in the 70's and 80's preferred internegatives to having to contrast mask Cibachrome, and neither of us really liked the type R of that time. His 35mm internegatives of 35mm slides lost some detail, but medium format internegatives held up very well. One of the issues he had with Cibachrome was the loss of delicate color, for example faint pinks that would go white. I don't know if things got better since then, as I stopped getting prints from slides, preferring to just project.
I did love some Cibachromes I had made, but others were just more intense than what I wanted. That is, it sort of amped up softer images.
Anyway, without type R or Ilfochrome, internegatives are still a viable method to print slides if scanning is not desired.
This will be very interesting to follow. I wonder what the pricing will be. Did Ferrania ever make papers?
This will be very interesting to follow. I wonder what the pricing will be. Did Ferrania ever make papers?



This will be very interesting to follow. I wonder what the pricing will be. Did Ferrania ever make papers?
| Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |
