flavio81
Allowing Ads
In 2015, ADOX took over the coating machine from Ilford Imaging Switzerland, which was used for research of many products, including inkjet materials and the legendary Cibachrome. The machine is located in Marly, Switzerland, and occupies three floors. The factory was built around the coating machine, with many labs and research spaces.
Now turned into ADOX Switzerland, the company is actively researching and developing products. The Snap-On filters and the Captura dust-free powder technology are one of the many Swiss projects.
Adox site
In 2015, ADOX took over the coating machine from Ilford Imaging Switzerland, which was used for research of many products, including inkjet materials and the legendary Cibachrome. The machine is located in Marly, Switzerland, and occupies three floors. The factory was built around the coating machine, with many labs and research spaces.
Now turned into ADOX Switzerland, the company is actively researching and developing products. The Snap-On filters and the Captura dust-free powder technology are one of the many Swiss projects.
Adox site
Yeah thats pretty much what my Solaris looks like, I have some other negatives i shot on a cheap disposable camera from the 90s too which will be interesting to check the markings.The Ferrania film edge markings (in 35mm) were like this. There were (IIRC) + and/or dots in purple, orange and green depending on the generation of the film.
View attachment 411998
View attachment 411999
Yes I remember hearing a bit about this, that means that likely Ferrania had some good patents for X-ray film if Kodak purchased their division, its not Like Kodak wasnt making the stuff themselves prior.Ferrania made xray film for Kodak and boxed it into yellow Kodak boxes. They sold that division to Kodak at the beginning of the '00. There are many interviews from ex Ferrania people on YouTube that talk about this.
I remember watching their video showing the scale of the big boy coater, it certainly was huge. Im not sure how it compares in volume to Kodak or Fujis coaters at the time, but it appeared to make a huge amount of waste per run too which is understandable, so to be economic, they had to sell enough volume.Why do you find it so hard to believe? Only because you never saw a box that said "Ferrania "? As explained, their main business was selling boxes with other branding.
I also read somewhere that they also made some of the Konica or Sakura or Ilford color film (yes, ilford sold color film in the past).
Exactly, think about how much film would wal-mart have sold. And consider that Kodak did NOT make white-label/off-brand film, it wasn't their business. I don't think Fuji was interested either. As far as I understand, for color film only Ferrania made off-brand film, and there was Tura which rebadged Agfa film.
There was a video on the old FILM Ferrania website, before being bought by their current owner, they illustrated the size of the film drying tunnel, and the area was something like the area of a football stadium.
Take into account that the Ferrania factory had its own hydroelectric power plant...
Yes, it was the highest speed slide film on the market, and 640T was the highest speed tungsten E6 film in the market by far, only Kodak Ektachrome 320T came close.
One needs to remember that 3M was a serious company, for example in magnetic tape production they were the absolute best in manufacturing quality. When they bought Ferrania they probably would have ensured to create a quality product, even if it was for a low cost tier.
I have the feeling their market was mainly house brands near the end, I have never seen Ferrania films available here in New Zealand that I can remember, but I have likely purchased re branded Ferrania film from the dollar store on occasion.I think myself and other people also demand more serious argumenting from your side.
Yes, when FILM Ferrania (the attempted resurrection) started, there were some figures about the scale of the former Ferrania operation, and it was a very big scale.
I think this is the key here, C41, and not just any C41 film, but every day consumer film, not the professional lines of film, but just film that the average consumer could pick up and shoot and have acceptable photographs for their 4x6 prints.Maybe you can improve your online interactions by giving further effort to understand what is being discussed:
You see, the "debate" started here:
So the argument was that
they were (past)
possibly (that means, not claiming certainly but there was the possiblity)
once (at SOME point in time, for at least one occasion)
the world's largest manufacturer of C41 film.
Moreover, this argument was presented to support the key point: "THE ABILITY AND KNOWLEDGE WAS THERE".
All through the interaction, you have made the error of simplifying the argument, which is similar to going for a strawman argument. Not good.
Other people immediately understood Agulliver's enunciate correctly:
So, brbo, from the point Agulliver stated his enunciate, you distorted the original argument.
Now, back on track, the Ferrania factory had the capacity to be able to pump out almost 360 million rolls of film per year. To have an idea of the current state of affairs in terms of film color sold worldwide, a report states that in the year 2023, 11 (eleven) million color films were sold globally.
You can bet that on the film drought years (circa 2007-2017), the amount of color films sold was even less.
In those years, Kodak had serious problems trying to downscale, since they had many factories that were designed to be cost-efficient when operated at scale. They had to close many film production faciliites around the world, leaving only basically Rochester.
So, there is a big chance than from the early 2000s until ferrania's closure in 2009,
a. global demand for color film was way lower than 360 million a year, thus Ferrania could produce all the world's color film if they had the chance to,
and
b. kodak sales diminished up to the point the off-brand film market (and disposable cameras film market), dominated by Ferrania, equals or even has bigger sales than the regular consumer film market (dominated by Kodak & friends)
Thus,
There is a possiblity that at some point in time Ferrania made more C41 film than Kodak or whoever was traditionally dominating that product type. Now, probably at that point in time, even with this edge, this was not profitable at all for Ferrania (for the same reasons Kodak had to close factories: too small scale for their operations) and thus they had to close operations.
Its good news to see that not only that this machinery has been saved, but is being put back into use, I remember reading some time back that ADOX was investing in building a new factory for producing more film, but this appears to be a separate venture they have done?In 2015, ADOX took over the coating machine from Ilford Imaging Switzerland, which was used for research of many products, including inkjet materials and the legendary Cibachrome. The machine is located in Marly, Switzerland, and occupies three floors. The factory was built around the coating machine, with many labs and research spaces.
Now turned into ADOX Switzerland, the company is actively researching and developing products. The Snap-On filters and the Captura dust-free powder technology are one of the many Swiss projects.
Adox site
Yes. If you look at my link, you can see everything about their factories.I remember reading some time back that ADOX was investing in building a new factory for producing more film, but this appears to be a separate venture they have done?
I remember seeing Konika film around, but I dont know if they coated much themselves, or if it was all Ferrania film?
Ferrania were also making their own acetate film base which is impressive, im not sure when they stopped making that, but I have the impression they were doing it for a long time.
They could have quite a lucrative business making that stuff since Kodak dont even make it anymore as far as im aware (only estar is made by Kodak) and I could imagine other film companies would be interested in purchasing it.
I remember seeing Konika film around, but I dont know if they coated much themselves, or if it was all Ferrania film? It appears they had rebranded Ferrania film at some point from what I can tell.
I shot some ADOX Colour implosion a while back, had quite a retro feel, but I think it was coated for them by someone else at the time.
I wonder where it will go from here? Will we ever see Cibachrome again?
I think it was InovisCoat. Maybe. I can be wrong. But now, what was InovisCoat is now part of the same group that owns "Original Wolfen" and Ferrania.
It was, I'm pretty sure. All the ADOX color films are InovisCoat/Filmotec, renting time from Polaroid's Monheim facility. I believe InovisCoat is the only company that does custom films for 3rd parties (eg. many of the Lomo films), as opposed to just relabeling.
Such fun to pick themView attachment 412077
This image was assembled by the FILM Ferrania team in an attempt to display the hundreds upon hundreds of brands of film produced during the 3M era.
https://thedarkroom.com/film-brand/...LnBaDpP-kO0zArRRESjvNTYUlLxHjdoeJSQ1S-KZGZaw7
Such fun to pick them
Sooters is #3 in the second row, I am Not sure if they were in the states
sears and k-mart at 2 and 7 in the 7th row
and Zellers (part of Hudson's bay at 7 in the last row
most of the ones i remember where identified with a paper sticker. the cassettes just said CP 100 or CP 400)I wonder who printed the decoration on the metal cassettes? That's pretty cool.
The letters “EXL” appearing on the roll are the name of the 3M Ferrania color negative film generation from the period 1991-1994.
Belmont was a large wholesale photofinisher/lab in Northern Ireland. It was bought out by Spectra Photo, the largest lab in the Republic of Ireland at the time. The Spectra brand was rebadged Agfa but AFAIK, they kept the Belmont brand as Ferrania.
As I write this post, new batches of P33 are being processed at LRF. Format 135 - 36 exp.
As I write this post, new batches of P33 are being processed at LRF. Format 135 - 36 exp.
Sorry, in English the acronym stands for Photographic Research Laboratories (Ferrania)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?