Film development woes: edge overdevelopment?

$12.66

A
$12.66

  • 3
  • 2
  • 40
A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 0
  • 0
  • 95
A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 1
  • 1
  • 84
img746.jpg

img746.jpg

  • 5
  • 0
  • 85
No Hall

No Hall

  • 1
  • 3
  • 82

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,794
Messages
2,780,964
Members
99,706
Latest member
Ron Harvey
Recent bookmarks
0
OP
OP
Scruff McGruff
Joined
Dec 4, 2008
Messages
56
Location
SF Bay Area
Format
35mm
Kirk,

No problem, I was just joking around a bit. :smile: Neat stuff, though!

Steve,

Thanks for that bit of info-- I asked in a previous post if there were differences between the 135 and 120 film base/emulsion, so I appreciate you chiming in!
 

stevew

Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2005
Messages
8
Location
California
Format
35mm
Base density

Just from memory, 120 base density around 0.10. 35mm triX around 0.25, so quite abit of difference. Some 35mm bases are very clear but have problems with light piping-such as the micro films.
 

Lamar

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2008
Messages
375
Location
Georgia, USA
Format
35mm
Same Problem

Scruff,
I just ran across this thread. I'm having the same problem. I've been through many, but not all of the checks you have done to eliminate causes. It's not my camera or scanner, I had ruled them out. It looks as if you have done exhaustive testing over a long period of time. In the same period of time I have only shot & developed maybe 5 rolls of B&W but have seen the problem on all. I will be trying some of the suggestions here and continuing to follow the thread. If I run across a solution I will post.
 

justpete

Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2006
Messages
67
Location
Dallas, TX
Format
Multi Format
Scruff,

How are you rinsing and drying the film?

Is it possible there's reticulation from a temperature shock due to running water into the tank as your rinse method? Some of the earlier images looked a bit like reticulation but it's not easy for me to be positive.

Just to be sure, are you using one of the vacuum column 'archival' film reel washers fed by tap water? Or are you using the Ilford three step wash method, preferably with DW?

When you dry the film do you hang it at an angle so the water can run down one edge or straight down so it can run down the entire film surface and both edges?

Either way are you applying a weight at the free end to keep the film straightened out during the process? It can "pool" either way and change the apparent density of the edges, btdt.

Are you using a squeegee, your fingers, or a sponge to get most of the water off the film after rinsing prior to hanging to dry? I'm assuming you're not using a DSA/Senrac or the like for forced air drying while the film's still on the reel, right?

Got a ceiling fan running or are you near an air conditioning vent that might be changing the temp of the film while it's still wet? Long shot I know but it's worth asking I think.

Some emulsions are more prone to reticulation than others and it's not absolutely positive that the Arista is absolutely identical to Kodak Tri-X, at least not to me anyway for what that's worth. Apparent base+fog can increase if the film gets reticulated, maybe you could provide a magnified scan of some of the worse bits of film to see if there's a reticulated pattern present.

HTH,
Pete
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom