Film Can Pinhole - 2 day exposure

Zakynthos Town

H
Zakynthos Town

  • 0
  • 0
  • 229
Driftwood

A
Driftwood

  • 7
  • 1
  • 302
Trees

D
Trees

  • 2
  • 3
  • 580
Waiting For The Rain

A
Waiting For The Rain

  • 3
  • 0
  • 884
Sonatas XII-53 (Life)

A
Sonatas XII-53 (Life)

  • 4
  • 3
  • 1K

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,779
Messages
2,796,584
Members
100,033
Latest member
apoman
Recent bookmarks
0

limnidytis

Member
Joined
May 8, 2011
Messages
59
Location
Iowa
Format
35mm
Lately I've been too busy with work work to do much with photography. Really depressing. But late at night a couple of days ago, I was sitting in the basement (AKA the darkroom) thinking what could I do. Inspired by other similar undertakings, I decided to make a film can camera. I have a lot of empty film cans, so I drilled a 3/8 hole in the middle of a black can with a wood bit. I used heavy duty aluminum foil and made a hole with a 30 gauge needle - the smallest I could find in my workbench. The film can has a 31mm focal length. Using one of the online calculators, the "camera" should have a 0.221 mm pinhole. A 30 gauge needle is 0.3112 mm in diameter - much too big - but why obsess about small details. The 30 gauge hole equals a F99. The 30 gauge hypodermic needle I used has a very long, sharp bevel on the tip so it mostly cut a slit in the foil rather than punching a hole, but again why worry? The shutter was a high tech piece of black tape. I have some Arista Ortho Litho film, which I cut into a 1.75x2in piece that covered about 1/2 of the inner diameter of the can. So I loaded the "camera", opened the shutter, and turned the lights on. And then I waited. For 2 days. The calculated exposure time for F99 and ISO 3 was about 6 hours. The overhead lights were probably on 6-8 hours and otherwise the safe lights or no lights were on. I developed the film in Selectol Soft 1+9 and got actually a pretty good negative. I was shocked to see that the image has good contrast. In my experience, pinhole photos tend to be low contrast - from flare in the camera, I assume. Maybe the higher contrast litho film actually made the contrast better. To stress the system more, I contact printed the negative onto very old fogged Kodak Polycontrast RC paper. It actually worked out shockingly well. It's interesting that in the middle top of the image there is a very bright Thomas safelight that was on some of the time but the light didn't show up in the image at all. I guess it really is safe.
150599_533448846686788_1625855706_n.jpg
The "Camera"
385176_533448883353451_311387244_n.jpg
The "Lens"
483819_533448866686786_1851023471_n.jpg
Developing in weighing boats
550267_533448923353447_1949037017_n.jpg
The "Negative". My iPhone sees bands on my lightbox- maybe it's a shutter/flicker artifact.
602031_533448966686776_1977857852_n.jpg
The "Image"
602066_533448806686792_51384829_n.jpg
Scanned Image. Not bad for extreme low tech.
 

summicron1

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Messages
2,920
Location
Ogden, Utah
Format
Multi Format
veryfun, and a nice illustration of one of the really great things about pinhole -- you can get away with murder.
 

Michael W

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
1,594
Location
Sydney
Format
Multi Format
Well done. I get the same banding with my iPhone when photographing lightboxes - I think it's fluro flicker.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom