Ferrania P30 - contrast too high

<--

D
<--

  • 2
  • 0
  • 64
The Bank

A
The Bank

  • 0
  • 1
  • 119
Kildare

A
Kildare

  • 0
  • 0
  • 369
Sonatas XII-27 (Homes)

A
Sonatas XII-27 (Homes)

  • 0
  • 1
  • 448

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,318
Messages
2,789,561
Members
99,870
Latest member
AlternativeProcesses
Recent bookmarks
0

darkosaric

Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
4,568
Location
Hamburg, DE
Format
Multi Format
I tried Ferrania P30, and the grain is small, but contrast is really high. It reminds me on Efke 25, where I had problem with contrast control. I tried Rodinal 1+25, also 1+50, but it was always too high for my taste.
I just got couple of rolls to try it out, as I always do on new films, but I think it does not suit my needs.

One more thing: one roll of film had an issue with winding the film, it was going out from the canister with very high firce, my Leica Minilux was strugling, and when I rewinded the film back - I neede to press rewind couple of times, it rewinds 5-6 frames, then stops, then I shutdown the camera, power on, and again 5-6 frames... strange thing, only on one from 4 rolls, never seen that before.

Here is one example - where I user very low filter on paper, to save at least something:


IMG_2385.JPG
 

loccdor

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 12, 2024
Messages
1,580
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
Regarding the winding, I can corroborate your observation: my Canon EOS Elan 7E also winds this film a little differently than those from other manufacturers, the sound is more strained and it usually leaves some of the leader out.

I've tried stand development with 510-pyro 1+300, 1 hour, and liked the results, but it is a contrasty film in general, and it works better in softer light.
 

Alan9940

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2006
Messages
2,430
Location
Arizona
Format
Multi Format
If you expose at box speed and develop per most recommendations out there, you will indeed get higher contrast negatives. Like Andrew, I expose P-30 at EI 32 and develop in D-96 1:1. The resulting negatives result in normal contrast from this film.
 

Agulliver

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2015
Messages
3,587
Location
Luton, United Kingdom
Format
Multi Format
Shrugs....it's known to be a high contrast film. I use it when I want high contrast photos, for artistic reasons. I wouldn't use P30 if I was looking for low-to-normal contrast.
 

Hubigpielover

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2016
Messages
405
Location
Thibodaux, La
Format
Multi Format
I tried Ferrania P30, and the grain is small, but contrast is really high. It reminds me on Efke 25, where I had problem with contrast control. I tried Rodinal 1+25, also 1+50, but it was always too high for my taste.
I just got couple of rolls to try it out, as I always do on new films, but I think it does not suit my needs.

One more thing: one roll of film had an issue with winding the film, it was going out from the canister with very high firce, my Leica Minilux was strugling, and when I rewinded the film back - I neede to press rewind couple of times, it rewinds 5-6 frames, then stops, then I shutdown the camera, power on, and again 5-6 frames... strange thing, only on one from 4 rolls, never seen that before.

Here is one example - where I user very low filter on paper, to save at least something:


View attachment 373297

FINALLY! I have been waiting for a replacement for my beloved Efke 25. I have some in the fridge that I wanted to test out. If I stick with it, what developer do you recommend.
 

warden

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 21, 2009
Messages
3,078
Location
Philadelphia
Format
Medium Format
I tried Ferrania P30, and the grain is small, but contrast is really high. It reminds me on Efke 25, where I had problem with contrast control. I tried Rodinal 1+25, also 1+50, but it was always too high for my taste.
I just got couple of rolls to try it out, as I always do on new films, but I think it does not suit my needs.

One more thing: one roll of film had an issue with winding the film, it was going out from the canister with very high firce, my Leica Minilux was strugling, and when I rewinded the film back - I neede to press rewind couple of times, it rewinds 5-6 frames, then stops, then I shutdown the camera, power on, and again 5-6 frames... strange thing, only on one from 4 rolls, never seen that before.

Here is one example - where I user very low filter on paper, to save at least something:


View attachment 373297

Even with the lack of shadow detail I like the first image quite a bit because (to me) the shadows don’t matter much here anyway. But the second two I agree are struggling due to contrast. It’s a hard film to get right unless you don’t mind very slow speeds.
 

Milpool

Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2023
Messages
776
Location
n/a
Format
4x5 Format
It seems to be a somewhat oddly sensitized, slow speed (or high contrast)/fine grain film. Might as well use it where/when those characteristics are what you’re looking for.
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2023
Messages
457
Location
Cleveland
Format
35mm
I have never found much use for very slow films.They demand very delicate development. I recommend using FX39-II 1+19 for 8-10 minutes to start, for this film and for Pan-F+.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
darkosaric

darkosaric

Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
4,568
Location
Hamburg, DE
Format
Multi Format
For the photos that I do (people and street) - normal iso 100 and iso 400 films are perfect (Foma, Ilford, Adox, Kodak). But I like to experiment with different cameras, films and papers, so here and there I get something new, especially when new film comes to a market - I want to support them. But it is true - those films like P30 are not easy.
 

JPD

Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2007
Messages
2,157
Location
Sweden
Format
Medium Format
If you expose at box speed and develop per most recommendations out there, you will indeed get higher contrast negatives. Like Andrew, I expose P-30 at EI 32 and develop in D-96 1:1. The resulting negatives result in normal contrast from this film.

Why 32 and not 25?
 

JPD

Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2007
Messages
2,157
Location
Sweden
Format
Medium Format
Because EI 32 is what I determined it to be after my normal testing procedure.

Ok. It has never been an exact science for me since I use so many different cameras, with 60-100 year old leaf shutters. 🙂
 

bluechromis

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 11, 2015
Messages
682
Format
35mm
Well, Rodinal 1+25 and 1+50 are not working very good, maybe semi stand in 1+100, but I did not tried that. I used 1+100 and semi stand for Efke 25. Some guys in this thread recommended other developers that are worth trying.
P30 at E.I. 25 in Rodinal 100 + 1 semi-stand, 1 hr. worked well for me. E.I. 40 with Adox Silvermax developer also worked. I think the idea of using the Adox HR-50 developer is worth trying. Some say the Silvermax and HR-50 developers correspond to Spur developers. The photo is Rodinal semi-stand. There was detail in all the shadows.
 

Attachments

  • powell_butte_ferranina_9_2020-17.jpg
    powell_butte_ferranina_9_2020-17.jpg
    480.4 KB · Views: 54
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom