Favourite portrait lenses.

Oak

A
Oak

  • 0
  • 0
  • 6
High st

A
High st

  • 5
  • 0
  • 43
Flap

D
Flap

  • 0
  • 0
  • 20

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,215
Messages
2,787,971
Members
99,838
Latest member
HakuZLQ
Recent bookmarks
0

Ellenmarie

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2004
Messages
48
Location
SC
Format
35mm
Nikkor 85mm f1.8 .. love it.
 

Claire Senft

Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2004
Messages
3,239
Location
Milwaukee, W
Format
35mm
Nicole Do you own a camera that has a 75mm 2.8 available for it? How does it compare to your 80mm Hasselblad lens?
 

Nicole

Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
2,562
Location
Perth, Western Australia
Format
Multi Format
Claire I rent a MF Pentax 645 every once in a while with a 75mm 2.8 lens, it's gorgeous! I can't compare the blad 6x6 80mm and pentax 645 75mm lenses, they are both very different, IMO.
 

Tom Hoskinson

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
3,867
Location
Southern Cal
Format
Multi Format
Ara Ghajanian said:
I also vote in favor of the Nikkor 105mm f2.5 for portraits, but I must admit I have taken a lot of portraits with a Nikkor 50mm f1.4 with great results. I personally love the bokeh.

What would you experienced Nikkor fans recommend for an 85mm? There are so many to choose from.

Another question: I have never used a soft focus filter before. Sounds like something I'd like to experiment with. Can anyone recommend a good one for a reasonable price?
Ara

Depends on how you define "reasonable."

The new 85mm f1.4 Zeiss Planar in Nikon mount.
 

jimgalli

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
4,236
Location
Tonopah Neva
Format
ULarge Format
First, I have no business in this discussion as I don't do 35mm portraits. Couple of thoughts though. Don's shot with the Leica lens is simply gorgeous. Perfect. As is David's with the Kodak lens. What a grand idea that. The out of focus area in John's shots really trouble me. Bad .jpg or just really bad bokeh? Finally, any portrait is better than no portrait at all. You could spend a lifetime buying junker cameras on ebay and pointing them at people.
 

joeyk49

Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Messages
1,325
Location
New Jersey,
Format
Multi Format
RokkorX 135mm f2.8

OK...its the only "portrait length" lens I have. I recently put my auto 35 with a zoom on a shelf, in favor of an Minolta X370 with Rokkor prime glass (a 50 and a 135). The experience is almost like turning on a light switch...

Now the Rokkor may be a little sharp for portraiture, but I plan to have a lot of fun with it anyway...
 

df cardwell

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 16, 2005
Messages
3,357
Location
Dearborn,Mic
Format
Multi Format
I wish had a better way of sharing images than this.. :sad:

mrcallow's negs are so pretty you could weep,
gotta get the man a zillion dollar scanner
 

jd callow

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 31, 2003
Messages
8,466
Location
Milan
Format
Multi Format
df cardwell said:
I wish had a better way of sharing images than this.. :sad:

mrcallow's negs are so pretty you could weep,
gotta get the man a zillion dollar scanner

Thanks Don. I also wish there was a better way to share images. The jpg's are overly sharpened (sorry) neg scans, the out of focus areas are wonderful (to my eye) when viewed as intended.
 

Simon E

Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2005
Messages
89
Location
Shropshire
Format
35mm
Olympus OM 85mm f2 - used by Jane Bown of The Observer (UK newspaper) almost exclusively, to marvellous effect, for over 30 years.
 

Michel Hardy-Vallée

Membership Council
Subscriber
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
4,793
Location
Montréal, QC
Format
Multi Format
The SMC Takumar 50mm f1.4 gave me great portraits of my furry friends with its lovely bokeh and very shallow DOF. The J9 seems to be a new keeper, but I haven't tried it on portraits yet.
 

Roger Hicks

Member
Joined
May 17, 2006
Messages
4,895
Location
Northern Aqu
Format
35mm RF
The lens comes quite low on my list after the subject, the lighting and the materials (film, dev, paper dev), but I like the 90/4 Dreamagon, the 90/2.2 Thambar, the 90/2 Summicron, the 75/2 Summicron, the 135/1.8 Porst/Soligor, the 58/1,4 Nikkor, the 200/3 Vivitar Series 1... anything I've got from 58-200mm, really, depending on the effect I want. Or with a full-size camera (8x10 inch) , a 21 inch (533mm) f/7.7 Ross at full aperture.

Look at the 'About Us' section in www.rogerandfrances.com and you'll see a Dreamagon shot of my wife Frances Schultz in black and white. Or if you subscribe to Black & White magazine (the UK version) that's the picture they use as her contributor shot. As far as I recall, Marie Muscat-King's portrait of me in my weekly Amateur Photographer column (also in the 'About Us' section) was shot with a 70-210/2.8 Apo-Sigma.

Cheers,

Roger
 
Last edited by a moderator:

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,262
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Simon E said:
Olympus OM 85mm f2 - used by Jane Bown of The Observer (UK newspaper) almost exclusively, to marvellous effect, for over 30 years.
I love my Zuiko 85mm f/2.0, although I don't know how often I am able to use it to "marvellous effect" :surprised:

Matt
 

benjiboy

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
11,975
Location
U.K.
Format
35mm
Jane Bown shot an 80th birthday portrait of the Queen, I saw recently (they are the same age) that knocked me out, it's really worth seeing if you can, she is a master of available light portraiture, and I have admired her work for years in The Observer, her style is what I aspire to, but will never achieve.
 

catem

Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2006
Messages
1,358
Location
U.K.
Format
Multi Format
Bentley Boyd said:
Jane Bown shot an 80th birthday portrait of the Queen, I saw recently (they are the same age) that knocked me out, it's really worth seeing if you can, she is a master of available light portraiture, and I have admired her work for years in The Observer, her style is what I aspire to, but will never achieve.
I feel this way as well, Jane Bown has to be one of my most favourite portrait photographers. I admire her work and her art greatly, and most of all her attitude to her subjects to the practice of photography in general.
 
Joined
Jun 18, 2003
Messages
324
Location
North Caroli
Format
Multi Format

Magnus W

Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2005
Messages
206
Location
Uppsala, Swe
Format
Multi Format
The Pentax SMC-M 85/2.0
I actually prefer this over the (reportedly) better Pentax SMC 85/1.8, at least for portraits.

-- MW
 

m_liddell

Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2004
Messages
209
Format
Medium Format
Paul Sorensen said:
I also don't really shoot 35mm, but I insist on mentioning my 180mm for my Mamiya RB67.

I agree!

Back on topic, I really like the nikon 105mm f/2.5 AIS.
 

Gerald Koch

Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2004
Messages
1,662
Format
Multi Format
A 135 focal length causes noticeable flattening of the facial features and I would not consider it suitable. Something close to 100 mm is a much better choice although anything from 85 to 120 mm is acceptable.
 

Max Power

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2004
Messages
598
Location
Aylmer, QC
Format
Multi Format
My Jupiter 9 (85mm/f2) in LTM gives amazing results when mated to either the R3A or Zorki 4. I really love the softness and shallow DOF wide open. An amazing lens.

Kent
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom