Favourite 6x9?

3 Columns

A
3 Columns

  • 5
  • 6
  • 68
Couples

A
Couples

  • 4
  • 0
  • 81
Exhibition Card

A
Exhibition Card

  • 6
  • 4
  • 120
Flying Lady

A
Flying Lady

  • 6
  • 2
  • 131

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,046
Messages
2,785,325
Members
99,790
Latest member
EBlz568
Recent bookmarks
0

alentine

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 4, 2006
Messages
200
Format
Multi Format
Hello,
Fujifilm GSW690 is a genius idea.
When you need to go light, one lens kit that does not compromise IQ in any degree.
Find a bag that take the camera plus on flash shoe exposure meter plus plenty of films.
Tripod? Camera does not demand a heavy tripod. Use f/11 and smaller.
All this at a small fraction of 28mm lens Leica M kit.
 

btaylor

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
2,256
Location
Los Angeles
Format
Large Format
As a Graflex fan, both the 2x3 Crown (cheap!) and the Graflex xl come to mind, though neither one is going g to fit in your pocket.
 

papagene

Membership Council
Council
Joined
Jun 11, 2004
Messages
5,438
Location
Tucson, AZ
Format
Multi Format
The Fuji GSW690 III with its wide angle lens compliments my Fuji GW670 II quite well, as it does my Bronica S2a, Rolleicord V, and my Rolleiflex mx-evs. It usually is my go to camera when hiking up in Rocky Mountain Nat'l Park.
 

MAubrey

Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
50
Format
Multi Format
Another Mamiya Universal user here.

A beast, but super reliable and a lot of fun! I have a shoe mounted Voigtlander VC meter sitting on the top.
 

jim10219

Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2017
Messages
1,632
Location
Oklahoma
Format
4x5 Format
I have a Busch Pressman C with a 620 adaptaroll. It’s got its quirks, but the price was right.
 

tessar

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2008
Messages
355
Location
Calgary, AB,
Format
Multi Format
Another vote for a Crown 2x3. Mine has the stock Rapar 101mm in a Rapax shutter; I like that front rise too. Close behind is a Graflex 2x3 Ser. B with 127mm Ektar, a little bulkier!
 

guangong

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
3,589
Format
Medium Format
Kodak Medalist (first version but with coated Ektar lens and fine focusing knob). For a long time wanted a Super Ikonta C, but after using my Fuji 67 folder I feel that a 69 folder may lack the ergonomic handholding steadiness of my Medalist, which was designed to be used handheld to photograph coastal targets from a ship. On the other hand, a Super Ikonta B can be held rock steady.
 
Joined
Jun 7, 2005
Messages
800
Location
Torino, Italy
Format
Large Format
I adore, literally, 6x9 format. I've always been crazy for it since my early youth. It's like having large format always with you, but in a pocketable size and with the convenience of 120 rollfilm.

I also own a Zeiss Ikon Super Ikonta 531/2. That's my standard camera for alpinism, I always carry it with me. I actually owned three Super Ikontas over the years, progressing in lens quality and camera conditions. These cameras are highly collectable and they're getting very old; finding a unit free from defects and at a reasonable price is not an easy task today. Unfortunately there are many collectors that pay big bucks for nearly perfect units, and then keep them still in a shrine. What a waste of excellent cameras.

In the past, I owned a Linhof Super Technika 6x9. Quite obviously this camera is expensive and also very heavy, but aside from that I can't say but great great things about it. That camera is "the ultimate keeper", I believe nothing better than that was made in 6x9; however with heavy heart I resold it when I stepped up to 4x5'' - the reason is that I can use a 6x9 rollfilm adapter with the 4x5'' camera, so the Linhof 6x9 basically had no more use for me. I hate to keep cameras still in a shrine (see above), so I passed it to someone else who hopingly will make great use of it.

My biggest regret in recent years is that the Voigtlander Bessa III was made 6x6 and 6x7 only. The twin format was a *brilliant* idea, but what a pity it was "only" 6x7, what a wasted chance. Why, oh why they didn't made it 6x9...:errm:
 

Prest_400

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2009
Messages
1,446
Location
Sweden
Format
Med. Format RF
My one and only 6x9 is a Fuji GW690III. Excellent machine.
I adore, literally, 6x9 format. I've always been crazy for it since my early youth. It's like having large format always with you, but in a pocketable size and with the convenience of 120 rollfilm.
***
My biggest regret in recent years is that the Voigtlander Bessa III was made 6x6 and 6x7 only. The twin format was a *brilliant* idea, but what a pity it was "only" 6x7, what a wasted chance. Why, oh why they didn't made it 6x9...:errm:
It is fun that 6x9 sometimes gets a rap about its aspect ratio... the same as 35mm. I haven't tried 6x7 but would welcome its 2 extra frames for some situations like travel, and under my budget of bang for the buck. Sometimes I do feel a "neither here nor there" with 2:3 because it can be awkward for some subjects. The Texas Leicas have a reputation for large and bulky, but I guess it's by comparison to 35mm.
A 6x9 + 6x7 camera would be indeed interesting.

And as StormPetrel samples above, it's possible to crop down to an Xpan ratio with a larger negative.
 

mrosenlof

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2010
Messages
621
Location
Colorado
Format
Multi Format
another GW690 user here. I had a iii and broke it. Now have a ii

I would probably like a GW680. I'm OK with the 2:3 aspect, but would probably prefer the 3:4 if I tried it.

I'm not a fan of 6x7. It's the only medium format size that doesn't fit a whole roll of film into any normal printFile page. 6x9, two across, 4 strips. 6x8 three frames on 3 strips, 6x6 three on 4 or four frames on 3 strips. 6x4.5 you get either 15 or 16 depending on camera, 15/3 or 16/4 either works. 6x7 -- 3 frames on 3 strips, then another page for the leftover. Whose idea was that?? (rant mode off)
 

wsetser

Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2009
Messages
8
Location
Harriman, TN
Format
4x5 Format
For 6x9 I use what's probably the most unusual camera I've seen. A mid 1930's Welta Superfekta. It's a folding 6x9 twin lens reflex with a revolving back. The taking lens is a 10.5cm f/3.8 Tessar and the viewing lens is a 7.5cm f/3.8 Weltaskop.
 

Attachments

  • SANY0094.JPG
    SANY0094.JPG
    432.7 KB · Views: 185
  • SANY0095.JPG
    SANY0095.JPG
    432.2 KB · Views: 169

dynachrome

Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2006
Messages
1,761
Format
35mm
I finally bought a 6X9 camera after thinking about one for quite a while. The camera is a Mamiya Press Super 23 with the 100/3.5 and a 6X9 back. It should get here in a few days. I have many 6X7 cameras and a 6X9 back for my 4X5 camera. Somewhere I have a 6X7 back for the Super 23.
 

EdSawyer

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2008
Messages
1,793
Format
Multi Format
my current favorite is the Kodak Tourist II with the 101mm f/4.5 anastar lens. With an auxilliary rangefinder it's very usable, and ridiculously cheap (I think I paid < $50 for it). It competes well with my GSW690III which is also a great camera, but in a different way (and much larger).
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,711
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
my current favorite is the Kodak Tourist II with the 101mm f/4.5 anastar lens. With an auxilliary rangefinder it's very usable, and ridiculously cheap (I think I paid < $50 for it). It competes well with my GSW690III which is also a great camera, but in a different way (and much larger).

I have the same model, I shoot mostly Landscapes so I just set the lens to infinity. Lens is very good and the camera is well made, not sure but I recall that the body is cast aluminum. I got mine from the Goodwill auction site, came with like new leather case, no signs of age, I paid $27.oo plus shipping with was another $15. I respool Tmaxt 100 onto 620 spools.
 

Jeff Bradford

Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2015
Messages
421
Location
Rolling Prairie, IN
Format
Medium Format
Another vote for the Kodak Medalist I or II.
 

michr

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2012
Messages
440
Format
Multi Format
For 6x9 I use what's probably the most unusual camera I've seen. A mid 1930's Welta Superfekta. It's a folding 6x9 twin lens reflex with a revolving back. The taking lens is a 10.5cm f/3.8 Tessar and the viewing lens is a 7.5cm f/3.8 Weltaskop.

I've never heard of anyone actually using the Superfecta, but these are on my must have list. Do you have any example photos?
 

xtolsniffer

Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2008
Messages
677
Location
Yorkshire, U
Format
Multi Format
Super Ikonta's go for silly money, but if you only want to spend about £10, Ikon nettar's are pretty good value. Mind you, no meter and guess focusing, but a lot of fun. Ikon 1939 Beach.jpg Ikon 1939  (8).jpg
 

summicron1

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Messages
2,920
Location
Ogden, Utah
Format
Multi Format
Voigtländer Bessa II with the Heliar is my only 6*9 game and it works extremely well for me ^^
ditto -- i have a super ikonta c as well as one of these, and the Bessa II is a lot easier to use, the viewfinder works better, the lens is amazing and the camera is very well-built.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom